Re: Installing second gcc

2003-03-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:19:22AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:18:45PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: > >>Is there a debian way to make the system use 3.2, or do i just > >>rename gcc-3.2 to gcc and apt-remove the old gcc? > > > >See /usr/share/doc/gcc

Re: Installing second gcc

2003-03-03 Thread Russell Shaw
Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:18:45PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: Is there a debian way to make the system use 3.2, or do i just rename gcc-3.2 to gcc and apt-remove the old gcc? See /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.2/README.Debian.gz. "update-alternatives --display gcc" says there's no alter

Re: Installing second gcc

2003-03-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:18:45PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: > Is there a debian way to make the system use 3.2, or do i just > rename gcc-3.2 to gcc and apt-remove the old gcc? See /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.2/README.Debian.gz. > "update-alternatives --display gcc" says there's no alternatives. Deli

Installing second gcc

2003-03-03 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, On woody, i got gcc-2.95.4 that came with the initial install. I just apt-got gcc-3.2, but gcc --version still says 2.95.4. Is there a debian way to make the system use 3.2, or do i just rename gcc-3.2 to gcc and apt-remove the old gcc? Is it safe to build kernels with 3.2? "update-alternatives