On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 05:44:59PM -0800, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>
> >
> That was my opinion and why I asked the original question. So, I should
> let aptitude know that I installed those packages myself? Even though
> they won't be in the same directories that aptitude thinks they should
> b
s. keeling wrote:
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:19:49PM -0700, Jeff Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
Manually installed packages have status "i " while automatically
installed ones have "i A".
They have a "c" next to them.
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:19:49PM -0700, Jeff Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> >> Manually installed packages have status "i " while automatically
> >> installed ones have "i A".
> >
> > They have a "c" next to them.
>
>So what you di
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:19:49PM -0700, Jeff Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
>> Manually installed packages have status "i " while automatically
>> installed ones have "i A".
>
> They have a "c" next to them.
So what you did is you removed the Debian package and then ran "make
I accidentally replied to the sender and not the list.
Jeff
Original Message
Subject:Re: Installing Packages From Source
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I accidentally replied to the sender and not the list.
Jeff
Original Message
Subject:Re: Installing Packages From Source
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:23:29AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> There are a few packages that I install directly from source onto my
> system. On Aptitude I noticed the markauto option. Should I let aptitude
> know that I have installed those packages manually?
>
> The packages that I have inst
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:23:29 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> There are a few packages that I install directly from source onto my
> system. On Aptitude I noticed the markauto option. Should I let aptitude
> know that I have installed those packages manually?
That should not be necessary; aptit
There are a few packages that I install directly from source onto my
system. On Aptitude I noticed the markauto option. Should I let aptitude
know that I have installed those packages manually?
The packages that I have installed by source are:
MIMEDefang
Dovecot
SpamAssassin
Thanks,
Jeff
--
RAPPAZ Francois wrote:
> Hi, I would like to install libgnomeprint-2.2-2.10.
> On my sarge I got 2.8 and with Abiword, fill justified text using true type
> font are ill printed.
>
> I've read that upgrading libgnomeprint would solve this.
>
> The next version of libgnomeprint-2.2 I've found
On Thursday 02 March 2006 01:00, RAPPAZ Francois wrote:
> Hi, I would like to install libgnomeprint-2.2-2.10.
> On my sarge I got 2.8 and with Abiword, fill justified text using true
> type font are ill printed.
>
> I've read that upgrading libgnomeprint would solve this.
>
> The next version of l
Hi, I would like to install libgnomeprint-2.2-2.10.
On my sarge I got 2.8 and with Abiword, fill justified text using true type
font are ill printed.
I've read that upgrading libgnomeprint would solve this.
The next version of libgnomeprint-2.2 I've found is 2.12 and trying to install
as a
On 2003-11-11 06:55:36 +0800, csj wrote:
> You might try creating your own apt archive. An apt archive is just a
> directory (or subdirectories) full of debs. To make them visible
> to apt you create an index file called Packages (or gzipped to
> Packages.gz) using a command like "dpkg-scanpackag
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:42:02 +0100,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> What is the best way to compile and install packages from source with
> apt?
>
> I don't want to use "dpkg -i" once the packages are built (as suggested
> in the how-to) since dpkg doesn't check dependencies and may break the
> system
On 2003-11-10 11:15:26 -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
> dpkg does *check* dependencies, it just doesn't go out of its way to
> *correct* them. That is, dpkg shouldn't let you install a package if
> its dependencies aren't already installed. If you never use a --force
> option and your packages work,
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the best way to compile and install packages from source with
> apt?
>
> I don't want to use "dpkg -i" once the packages are built (as suggested
> in the how-to) since dpkg doesn't check dependencies and may break the
> system (it did in the pa
What is the best way to compile and install packages from source with
apt?
I don't want to use "dpkg -i" once the packages are built (as suggested
in the how-to) since dpkg doesn't check dependencies and may break the
system (it did in the past...).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web:
17 matches
Mail list logo
