On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:58:58PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 07/24/2007 03:30 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > and nobody calls me Mr... :)
>
> Yes sir! ;) I never know how to refer to people that I do not
> personally know, so I tend to default to formal titles.
Its such a pain to
On 07/24/2007 03:30 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:53:53PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
>> On 07/24/2007 01:50 PM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:25:21 -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
It says the packages *are* broken, which is not true.
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:53:53PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 07/24/2007 01:50 PM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:25:21 -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> >> On 07/24/2007 08:40 AM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>>
> >>> aptitude likes to make you panic...
> >>
> >> LOL! A
On 07/24/2007 01:50 PM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:25:21 -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
>> On 07/24/2007 08:40 AM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>>
>>> aptitude likes to make you panic...
>>
>> LOL! And it works too. I have seen output several times that has
>> made me think
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:25:21 -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 07/24/2007 08:40 AM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[...]
> > aptitude likes to make you panic...
>
> LOL! And it works too. I have seen output several times that has
> made me think hard before continuing. But it's silly the way i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:25:21PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 07/24/2007 08:40 AM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:51:28PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> >> Should I purge OOo first? This is my first attempt to install
> >> from backports, so I am not sure about th
On 07/24/2007 08:40 AM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:51:28PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Should I purge OOo first? This is my first attempt to install
>> from backports, so I am not sure about this. I have searched,
>> but did not find anything helpful.
>
> If you
On 07/24/2007 04:50 AM, Mark Grieveson wrote:
>On 07/24/2007 12:20 AM, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> > When I try to install with "aptitude -t etch-backports
> > install openoffice.org", aptitude proposes an interesting
> > solution. From what I see, I don't think I should accept it.
>
> It looks fine
Glen, I've not used backports (I run mostly sid) and so take this with
a grain of salt, but I read it like this:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:51:28PM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> I have OOo 2.0.4 installed from the stable repository. I want to
> install 2.2.1 from backports so I added backports to
> I have OOo 2.0.4 installed from the stable repository. I want to
> install 2.2.1 from backports so I added backports to my sources.
> When I try to install with "aptitude -t etch-backports install
> openoffice.org", aptitude proposes an interesting solution. From
> what I see, I don't think I
I have OOo 2.0.4 installed from the stable repository. I want to
install 2.2.1 from backports so I added backports to my sources.
When I try to install with "aptitude -t etch-backports install
openoffice.org", aptitude proposes an interesting solution. From
what I see, I don't think I should ac
11 matches
Mail list logo
