On 21/03/20 at 06:56, Daniel Harris wrote:
>The only thing i can think of is that the
>Can't open display
>message is usually because you are trying to access an X app as root.
>Maybe trying running the script when logged into to gnome as an
>unprivileged/normal user
>if tha
The only thing i can think of is that the
Can't open display
message is usually because you are trying to access an X app as root.
Maybe trying running the script when logged into to gnome as an
unprivileged/normal user
if that fails try using the alternative method of install by using the wget
m
Hi!
Thank you so much!
It already installed.
root@marcelo:~# apt search linux-headers-$(uname -r)
Sorting... Pronto
Full Text Search... Pronto
linux-headers-5.4.0-4-amd64/testing,unstable,now 5.4.19-1 amd64
[installed,automatic]
Header files for Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64
root@marcelo:~#
--
Mar
Marcelo Laia wrote:
> I try to install evdi-dkms and got error messages:
try installing the linux-headers package for the kernel version you are
using.
Dear Debian Guys!
I am try to install DisplayLink on my Debian notebook Dell Inspiron
I15-5547-A20.
However, I have issues.
This is the steps I does:
1. git clone https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/displaylink-debian.git
2. cd displaylink-debian/ && sudo ./displaylink-debian.sh
Here, I got the m
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 03:05:51
From: Umarzuki Mochlis
To: "Shawn Li (??)"
Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org"
Subject: Re: debian-6.0.4-i386-DVD-1.iso install issue
Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 08:06:09 + (UTC)
Rese
On Tuesday 08 November 2016 06:09:16 Shawn Li (李松) wrote:
> Hello，
>
> I have downloaded debian-6.0.4-i386-DVD-1.iso from debian.org,and I install
> it to my computer.when the install finish,I got a AMD64 version debian.but
> my computer’s CPU is 32bit and the DVD iso is i386,
>
> could yout please
> I have downloaded debian-6.0.4-i386-DVD-1.iso from debian.org,and I install
> it to my computer.when the install finish,I got a AMD64 version debian.but
> my computer’s CPU is 32bit and the DVD iso is i386,
>
>
which url are you using?
have you compared its hash?
please verify.
>
> could yout p
Hello，
I have downloaded debian-6.0.4-i386-DVD-1.iso from debian.org,and I install it
to my computer.when the install finish,I got a AMD64 version debian.but my
computer’s CPU is 32bit and the DVD iso is i386,
could yout please tell me why? I just want to install a 32bit debian6 os.thank
you.
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:13:18AM +0200, Wessel Nieboer wrote:
> Did you fix this issue you were having? My udev is not installing properly
> but the kernel is OK for me.
Hi Wessel,
Looking back to refresh my memory:
Yes, this issue was easily fixed by following the advice in the first reply
tha
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, Matthijs wrote:
>
> On 27-12-2014 19:12, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, Matthijs wrote:
> >
> >> [snip]
> >> Basically I followed the normal recipe:
> >> change /etc/apt/sources.list to read 'jessie' instead of 'wheezy',
> >> then apt-get update, then apt-get
Matthijs wrote:
> In the end I've also replaced the kernel by the Jessie-version, so that
> possible issue is solved - but:
> would it perhaps be better if the wheezy-jessie upgrade process creates
> "/etc/udev/kernel-upgrade" by default to prevent upgrade issues? Or is
> stopping the upgrade for t
On Saturday 27 December 2014 20:27:16 Matthijs wrote:
> Or is
> stopping the upgrade for these exotic cases better?
Some people would probably be quite upset if their nice custom kernel was
replaced without a by-your-leave. I would be if I had gone to the trouble of
rolling one!
Personally, I
On 27-12-2014 20:45, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 dec 14, 15:27:38, deb...@vanaalten.net wrote:
version 3.4.9. But: that was a version I've compiled & installed myself some
time ago. Although I didn't make any significant changes to the features
during compilation, so I would expect no warni
On Sb, 27 dec 14, 15:27:38, deb...@vanaalten.net wrote:
>
> >BTW, what kernel are you running? As far as I understood the Wheezy
> >kernel should be fine with Jessie udev (but I could be wrong). Kind
> >regards, Andrei
>
> version 3.4.9. But: that was a version I've compiled & installed myself so
On 27-12-2014 19:12, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, Matthijs wrote:
[snip]
Basically I followed the normal recipe: change /etc/apt/sources.list
to read 'jessie' instead of 'wheezy', then apt-get update, then
apt-get dist-upgrade. That's how I've done it since 2003 or so, never
any
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, Matthijs wrote:
> [snip]
> Basically I followed the normal recipe: change /etc/apt/sources.list
> to read 'jessie' instead of 'wheezy', then apt-get update, then
> apt-get dist-upgrade. That's how I've done it since 2003 or so, never
> any big issues.
>
> [snip]
Just curious
(Andrei, apologies for accidently replying directly - message was of
course meant for the mailing list)
On 27-12-2014 14:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 dec 14, 13:36:26, Matthijs wrote:
...
Please upgrade your kernel before or while upgrading udev.
This is your solution.
Thanks. I alr
On 27-12-2014 14:47, Sven Joachim wrote:
Sorry if it sounds blunt, but have you actually read the messages you
pasted above? They should give you information what is missing from
your running kernel, and they also give advice how to force the udev
upgrade anyway.
If your kernel does not have C
On 2014-12-27 13:36 +0100, Matthijs wrote:
> After some time during the upgrade process I get the following error
> and upgrade stops:
>
> Unpacking replacement systemd ...
> dpkg: considering deconfiguration of udev, which would be broken by
> installation of consolekit ...
>
On Sb, 27 dec 14, 13:36:26, Matthijs wrote:
> ...
> Since release 198, udev requires support for the following features in
> the running kernel:
>
> - inotify(2)(CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER)
> - signalfd(2) (CONFIG_SIGNALFD)
> - accept4(2)
> - open_by_handle_at(2) (CONFIG_FHANDLE)
>
Hi all,
Apologies in advance: I'm not a frequent mailing list user, but I seem
to have messed up my system upgrade and hope someone here can help out
with advice.
Basically I followed the normal recipe: change /etc/apt/sources.list to
read 'jessie' instead of 'wheezy', then apt-get update, t
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:27:56 -0400, Ryan Nematz wrote:
(please, no html posts, thanks...)
> I burn my own DVD Install discs
Was the ISO downloaded from the official repositories?
> and when Debian was in the middle of installing I got a
> message...please insert Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.5 _Squeez
I burn my own DVD Install discs and when Debian was in the middle of
installing I got a message...please insert Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.5 _Squeeze_
- Official i386 DVD Binary-1 20120512-13:45. Where do in find this .iso?
On 2/21/08, David Shuman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> I did a standard network install in a Oldworld Mac Performa 6400, install
> was clean - three times -- twice with a single root partition formatted Ext3
> and once with an single root formatted ext2 partition (hda6 -- MAC HFS
> Boot
Hi;
I did a standard network install in a Oldworld Mac Performa 6400, install was
clean - three times -- twice with a single root partition formatted Ext3 and
once with an single root formatted ext2 partition (hda6 -- MAC HFS Boot --
hda7 -- swap -- hda8 -- root - (linux partitionconfirmed in
I just found a fix.
dpkg --ignore-depends=libxft-dev -r libxft-dev
works a treat
Caveman
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:21 pm, Caveman wrote:
> Thanks for that.
> Any tips on fixing it?
> I am thinking of trying to force the package to remove, is that a good idea
> ?
>
> Caveman
>
> On Tue, 20 Apr
Thanks for that.
Any tips on fixing it?
I am thinking of trying to force the package to remove, is that a good idea ?
Caveman
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:42 pm, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:10:08PM +1000, Caveman said
>
> > HI all. I did up system update but its seems that there is a
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:10:08PM +1000, Caveman said
> HI all. I did up system update but its seems that there is a a problem with
> the package libxft-dev.
>
> I get this error when I run apt-get
> Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5
> (using .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
> divers
HI all. I did up system update but its seems that there is a a problem with
the package libxft-dev.
I get this error when I run apt-get
Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5
(using .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h
to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xf
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 09:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my
> unstable box. When doing so I get a message requiring that
> I accpt the Sun license, but there seems to be no way to do
> this and certainly cannot click on any options as sugested.
> Th
On Friday 25 Jul 2003 17:32, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Actually it is 'yes' ;) but it should by obvious what to type once Ed
> gets there...
OK, OK, its been a while.
> Sorry for nitpicking,
You're forgiven ;)
Tom
--
^__^ Tom Badran
(oo)\__Imperial College
(__)\
Hello Tom!
At Friday 25 July 2003 18:00 Tom Badran wrote:
> On Friday 25 Jul 2003 15:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
>> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my
>> unstable box. When doing so I get a message requiring that I accpt
>> the Sun license, but there seems to be no way to do th
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 10:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown
> for my unstable box. When doing so I get a message
> requiring that I accpt the Sun license, but there seems
> to be no way to do this and certainly cannot click on any
> options as sugested.
On Friday 25 Jul 2003 15:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my unstable box.
> When doing so I get a message requiring that I accpt the Sun license, but
> there seems to be no way to do this and certainly cannot click on any
> options as sugested. Thi
Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my unstable box. When doing
so I get a message requiring that I accpt the Sun license, but there seems to be no
way to do this and certainly cannot click on any options as sugested. This hangs the
install.
Anyone else encountered t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 17 January 2002 7:16 am, Rob Weir wrote:
> Howdy
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently i ran into quite a lot of trouble with my Debian Gnu/Linux
> > system. I can't exactly recall w
Howdy
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently i ran into quite a lot of trouble with my Debian Gnu/Linux system. I
> can't exactly recall what triggered the mayhem but i think it had something
> to do with setting up an unstable entry in sources.lis
Hi,
Recently i ran into quite a lot of trouble with my Debian Gnu/Linux system. I
can't exactly recall what triggered the mayhem but i think it had something to
do with setting up an unstable entry in sources.list
After correcting this i found a number of stable-packages to be in the obsolote
>I get the monocrome/color dialog and then the dialog box that says "The
>installation program is determining the current state of your system" and
>here it stops - no message, nothing, just stops. The system is not
>completely frozen, I can switch to the other consoles but installation
>doesn't c
hi,
I'm new to Linux and to the list
I try to install Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 but no socess so far.
I get the monocrome/color dialog and then the dialog box that says "The
installation program is determining the current state of your system" and
here it stops - no message, nothing, just stops. The
On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, Philippe Dal wrote:
> Hi, everybody..
>
> Here is a question for you. I'm rather new in LINUX (but not in UNIX),
> and I encountered a major issue trying to install it, in a multi-OS
> environment.
>
> My system is an AMD cpu with all needed to run well (!?)... I have a
> 8.6
Hi, everybody..
Here is a question for you. I'm rather new in LINUX (but not in UNIX),
and I encountered a major issue trying to install it, in a multi-OS
environment.
My system is an AMD cpu with all needed to run well (!?)... I have a
8.6GB disk, on which I installed (using W95 FDISK):
43 matches
Mail list logo
