Re: Inline PGP with Evolution

2011-05-31 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Ma, 31 mai 11, 17:18:43, Camaleón wrote: > > P.S. IIRC Mutt allows to use both styles, and IMO that's what a good MUA > does, giving options to users. I agree, but I would still avoid if if at all possible, since I doubt it gets too much testing lately. Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussi

Re: Inline PGP with Evolution

2011-05-31 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:53:56 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Ma, 31 mai 11, 13:03:42, Camaleón wrote: >> >> It looks like only outline PGP signing is fully supported, but sounds a >> bit strange that nowadays this cannot be changed in the MUA. > > Probably because inline is deprecated for year

Re: Inline PGP with Evolution

2011-05-31 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Ma, 31 mai 11, 13:03:42, Camaleón wrote: > > It looks like only outline PGP signing is fully supported, but sounds a > bit strange that nowadays this cannot be changed in the MUA. Probably because inline is deprecated for years ;) Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users a

Re: Inline PGP with Evolution

2011-05-31 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:10:39 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Does anyone knows whether or not evolution (in squeeze) support > inline PGP signing ? I do need inline signing for a robot that only > support inline PGP. By reading this FAQ: http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ#I_receive_emails_b

Inline PGP with Evolution

2011-05-31 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi, Does anyone knows whether or not evolution (in squeeze) support inline PGP signing ? I do need inline signing for a robot that only support inline PGP. Thanks -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l