Re: Incorrect version of xserver-xorg in unstable

2006-08-23 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:41:41PM -0500, Kent West wrote: > Drew Parsons wrote: > > By now you shouldn't need to downgrade to testing's version since a new > > version of the old version has now been uploaded to unstable, > > 2:1.0.2-10. This repairs the mistaken upload, overturning my warning >

Re: Incorrect version of xserver-xorg in unstable

2006-08-23 Thread Kent West
Drew Parsons wrote: > By now you shouldn't need to downgrade to testing's version since a new > version of the old version has now been uploaded to unstable, > 2:1.0.2-10. This repairs the mistaken upload, overturning my warning > email. Systems will be restored with the next mirror pulse of unst

Re: Incorrect version of xserver-xorg in unstable

2006-08-23 Thread Drew Parsons
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:15 -0500, Kent West wrote: > Drew Parsons wrote: > > >An upload of xserver-xorg 1:1.1.1-3 was incorrectly made to unstable > >today. The intended target was experimental. The correct current > >version for unstable is 1:1.0.2-9. > > > Thanks for the notice, Drew. Unfortu

Re: Incorrect version of xserver-xorg in unstable

2006-08-23 Thread Kent West
Drew Parsons wrote: An upload of xserver-xorg 1:1.1.1-3 was incorrectly made to unstable today. The intended target was experimental. The correct current version for unstable is 1:1.0.2-9. The chief binary package affected is xserver-xorg-core. Other affected packages are xdmx, xdmx-tools, xn

Incorrect version of xserver-xorg in unstable

2006-08-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Summary: - Unstable users, please place xserver-xorg-core 1:1.0.2-9 on hold, or retrieve it from testing or fetch your latest video driver from experimental. - Users of testing and stable are not affe