Re: In a bind about named and network printing.

On 2002.12.03 18:06 Gary Hennigan wrote: "Paul Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: So far so good. How do your internal machines resolve external addresses? Does each of them have a resolve.conf that points to your ISP nameservers, as well as your internal nameserver, or do you have your interna

Re: In a bind about named and network printing.

"Paul Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been playing with my local networks 'named' and finally got it > working more or less the way I think it should. Evidence for this is > that I can ping and it returns the fully > qualified machine name plus the ping responces. This works on all > m

Re: In a bind about named and network printing.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 03 December 2002 1:58 pm, Paul Lewis wrote: > I have been playing with my local networks 'named' and finally got it > working more or less the way I think it should. Evidence for this is > that I can ping and it returns the fully qualified

Re: In a bind about named and network printing.

This one time, at band camp, Paul Lewis said: > I have been playing with my local networks 'named' and finally got it > working more or less the way I think it should. Evidence for this is > that I can ping and it returns the fully qualified > machine name plus the ping responces. This works on

In a bind about named and network printing.

I have been playing with my local networks 'named' and finally got it working more or less the way I think it should. Evidence for this is that I can ping and it returns the fully qualified machine name plus the ping responces. This works on all machines except the server 'named' is actually r