the proper way to further compress the large
>> images to save disk space.
>>
>> What image compression programs have people found to give good results?
>>
>> And to what extent is good image quality the result of the algorithms
>> that display the image, adju
On 05/21/2008 03:02 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I've noticed that some 40K byte jpeg files are very good, as good as ones
ten times the size, and that others are awful. The question naturally
arises about the proper way to further compress the large images to save
disk space.
What
es about the proper way to further compress the large
>> images to save disk space.
>>
>> What image compression programs have people found to give good results?
>>
>> And to what extent is good image quality the result of the algorithms
>> that display the image,
> disk space.
>
> What image compression programs have people found to give good results?
>
> And to what extent is good image quality the result of the algorithms
> that display the image, adjusting image size to screen size and
> resolution and the like?
isn't it
I've noticed that some 40K byte jpeg files are very good, as good as ones
ten times the size, and that others are awful. The question naturally
arises about the proper way to further compress the large images to save
disk space.
What image compression programs have people found to give
5 matches
Mail list logo