On 29 January 2011 12:38, David Parker wrote:
> > dhclient has a quiet option but because ifup/ifdown calls it I haven't
> > been able overide this.
>
> ifup must get called from a script, so you could probably just edit the
> script and suppress the output from ifup.
&
> dhclient has a quiet option but because ifup/ifdown calls it I haven't
> been able overide this.
ifup must get called from a script, so you could probably just edit the script
and suppress the output from ifup.
- Dave
ut because ifup/ifdown calls it I haven't
been able overide this.
Obviously this is purely aesthetic and affects nothing important on
the system but if anyone has a suggestion I would appreciate it.
Regards,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
he
mapping stanza, but that didn't work...
So as of now I have no auto loading of any interfaces (except by lo),
and I'm manually starting the interface I want. Not big deal, but
I've been wondering if there's a way to accomplish what I want. I
like a tool that integra
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Russell Shaw wrote:
> What do these isp proxies do? (apart from blindly relaying stuff)
They usually cache the data on the proxy server so that it can save
bandwidth for the ISP.
--
Matt Perry | matt at primefactor dot com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Perry wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Russell Shaw wrote:
The problem is that when i put http://127.0.0.1/ or http://192.168.0.1/
into mozilla, it goes thru the dialup isp instead of going
direct to my own system.
It seems more like a mozilla problem.
In mozilla: Edit|Preferences...|Advanced|Prox
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Russell Shaw wrote:
> The problem is that when i put http://127.0.0.1/ or http://192.168.0.1/
> into mozilla, it goes thru the dialup isp instead of going
> direct to my own system.
>
> It seems more like a mozilla problem.
> In mozilla: Edit|Preferences...|Advanced|Proxies,
Michael D Schleif wrote:
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:11:14:37:42+1100] scribed:
netstat -rn gives:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0
e
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:11:14:37:42+1100] scribed:
> netstat -rn gives:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0
> eth0
>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:15:41PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
> I tried:
>
> auto lo eth0
> iface lo inet loopback
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.0.1
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.0.0
> gateway 127.0.0.1
>
> but ifup -av gives:
>
> Configur
Akira Kitada wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:37:42PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
Hi,
In /etc/network/interfaces (debian-unstable), i have:
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.0.0
How do i get:
1
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:37:42PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In /etc/network/interfaces (debian-unstable), i have:
>
> auto lo eth0
> iface lo inet loopback
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.0.1
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.0.0
>
>
> How
Hi,
In /etc/network/interfaces (debian-unstable), i have:
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.0.0
netstat -rn gives:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
El(On) 01/06/2003 (04:38:29), Paul Matuszewski escribió(wrote):
[...]
> # Second
> auto eth0:26
> iface eth0:26 inet static
> address 192.168.0.26
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.0.0
> broadcast 192.168.0.255
>
> when I do..
> formosus:/etc/network# ifup
I'm attempting to add additional ip's to my interfaces and am having
trouble..:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.110
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.0.0
broadcast 192.168.0.255
gateway 192.168.0.1
# Second
auto eth0:26
iface eth0:26
Christian Jaeger wrote:
> - when removing an ethernet card from a pc laptop, the interface goes
> away (but does not trigger ifdown). When reinserting it, the
> interface does not come back. (One has to manually issue "ifdown
> eth0; ifup eth0").
If you're using ifupdown to manage pcmcia inter
Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, two other things I'm wondering about ifup/down:
>
> - when an interface is really down (as seen with ifconfig), why does
> ifup refuse it's operation saying "device already configured"? It
> could determine that
Sometimes ifdown will bring
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:58:13AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> check this series of commands:
Are you sure there's not an old /etc/init.d/network or other startup
script that brings the interface up initially using ifconfig?
In my experience, when ifup brings up an interface, ifdown brings i
luck.
Jimmy
Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Troy Telford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 1:51
PMTo: debian-user@lists.debian.orgSubject: eth0 detected
by kernel, ifconfig, ifup/ifdown can't configure it. lo (localhost) also h
I apologize if this is in HTML; Outlook express is all I have @ the
moment.
I've been working on this for a few hours now... I need some help! I
can get neither eth0 nor my localhost (lo) interfaces to work! They were
working fine earlier.I made a simple change to my filesystem - I needed
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Patrick Dahiroc wrote:
> i'm curious to know how ifup/ifdown does it's magic. how do
> i get the source code for these using apt-get
put a line like this in your /etc/apt/sources.list
deb-src http://your_favourite_mirror/debian potato main contrib non-free
I heard that Patrick Dahiroc wrote this on 04/11/00:
> i'm curious to know how ifup/ifdown does it's magic. how do
> i get the source code for these using apt-get
>
Well, first you need a deb-src line in your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org
i'm curious to know how ifup/ifdown does it's magic. how do
i get the source code for these using apt-get
--
"As a general rule, if you have trouble
with the binary system, then probably it
is because you do not really understand
the decimal system ..."
R.W. Hamming
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:11:48PM -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> Looks like woody and potato got the new netbase, adding use to the
> /etc/network/interfaces file (and taking away the need for
> /etc/init.d/network). Looks to me like /etc/init.d/pump and
> /etc/init.d/dhcp-client should be going as we
Oh, in that case, I have no idea. Isn't the hardware address usually fixed
in the card?
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allan M. Wind)
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:02:34 -0500
> To: Adam Goode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: New netbase,
On 2000-02-22 21:02:34, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> On 2000-02-22 16:54:03, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> > As for your first question, I don't follow what you mean.
>
> I need to set the hardware address on a nic card before the
> interface is brought up. Perhaps something like this:
>
> iface eth1 inet dh
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> On 2000-02-22 16:54:03, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> > As for your first question, I don't follow what you mean.
>
> I need to set the hardware address on a nic card before the
> interface is brought up. Perhaps something like this:
>
> ifa
On 2000-02-22 16:54:03, Adam Goode wrote:
> As for your first question, I don't follow what you mean.
I need to set the hardware address on a nic card before the
interface is brought up. Perhaps something like this:
iface eth1 inet dhcp
pre-up ifconfig eth1 hw ether SOME_MAC_ADDRESS
/
If you examine /etc/init.d/networking and the package version of
/etc/network/interfaces, then you should be able to decipher the workings of
it. If you didn't let the package version overwrite your own
/etc/network/interfaces, then you probably don't have the nice comments and
examples in that fil
On 2000-02-22 12:11:48, Adam Goode wrote:
> Also, there is a problem with ifdown and dhclient. Looks like the script
> tries to kill dhclient, but doesn't kill dhclient-2.2.x like it should be.
> Then lots of dhclients are left lying around...
Bummer...
Does the up line run before/concurrently/a
I've installed the new netbase right now. One question: in /etc/rc.S
there's still one link pointing to /etc/init.d/network. Can I delete it?
Radim
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Adam Goode wrote:
> Looks like woody and potato got the new netbase, adding use to the
> /etc/network/interfaces file (and tak
Looks like woody and potato got the new netbase, adding use to the
/etc/network/interfaces file (and taking away the need for
/etc/init.d/network). Looks to me like /etc/init.d/pump and
/etc/init.d/dhcp-client should be going as well. Any comments on this? Are
updates to pump and dhclient going to
32 matches
Mail list logo
