ok, thank you
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Johannes Wiedersich <
johan...@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de> wrote:
> Michael Casey wrote:
> > Firefox is at 3.0.10
> > Iceweasel is at 3.0.6 [stable]
> >
> > Sorry for asking, but doesn't it makes a security hole, having a non
> > up-to-date Iceweasel?
Michael Casey wrote:
> Firefox is at 3.0.10
> Iceweasel is at 3.0.6 [stable]
>
> Sorry for asking, but doesn't it makes a security hole, having a non
> up-to-date Iceweasel?
It seems my iceweasel is up-to-date (version was compiled with all
security fixes announced on 09 May 2009 [1]:
Iceweasel 3
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:05:05PM +0200, Michael Casey wrote:
>Firefox is at 3.0.10
>Iceweasel is at 3.0.6 [stable]
>
>Sorry for asking, but doesn't it makes a security hole, having a non
>up-to-date Iceweasel?
The security team and maintainers will usually be aware of any
securi
Firefox is at 3.0.10
Iceweasel is at 3.0.6 [stable]
Sorry for asking, but doesn't it makes a security hole, having a non
up-to-date Iceweasel?
Thank you
4 matches
Mail list logo