Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:13:26 +0800 Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > my mistake, the package is for amd64 and powerpc > http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=lenny-backports&searchon=names&keywords=iceweasel No, it's my mistake. I didn't properly check with the Debian packages page (hadn't sipped my m

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

2010/1/23 Graham > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:07:41 +0800 > Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote: > > > i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install > > iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 > > There isn't an iceweasel package in Backports, so you're stuck with > the one in Len

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:07:41 +0800 Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote: > i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install > iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 There isn't an iceweasel package in Backports, so you're stuck with the one in Lenny... unless you want to backport

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

2010/1/23 Wayne > [...] > > aptitude install iceweasel=(version you want) > > get the full version by doing > aptitude show iceweasel > > # aptitude show iceweasel Package: iceweasel State: not installed Version: 3.0.6-3 Priority: optional Section: web Maintainer: Eric Dorland Uncompressed Size

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

2010/1/23 Sven Joachim > On 2010-01-23 04:07 +0100, Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote: > > > i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install > > iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 > > Since the backport is brand new, it simply might not be available for > your architecture

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

On 2010-01-23 04:07 +0100, Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote: > i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install > iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 Since the backport is brand new, it simply might not be available for your architecture yet. What does "apt-cache policy ic

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote: i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 my /etc/apt/sources.list as below deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main deb

Re: cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote: i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 my /etc/apt/sources.list as below deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main deb

cannot install iceweasel 3.5 from lenny-backports

i had enabled lenny-backports but "aptitude -t lenny-backports install iceweasel" installs Iceweasel 3.0.6 my /etc/apt/sources.list as below deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-vol

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

also sprach Elimar Riesebieter [2009.09.09.2249 +0200]: > > I don't understand. mutt has no business with $@ or $[0-9], but > > I think you are probably hit by #545876. Does the patch fix it for > > you? > > No. I'll need more information then. Maybe you can isolate the entire argument line pass

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

* martin f krafft [090909 20:29 +0200] > also sprach Elimar Riesebieter [2009.09.09.1918 +0200]: > > This is somewhat overscripted from madduck ;-) The faxt is, that my > > mutt (hg version from Mutt 1.5.20+lxtecppc (2009-08-04) doesn't > > interpret neither $@ nor $[0-9]. I'll get over to mutt-de

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

also sprach Elimar Riesebieter [2009.09.09.1918 +0200]: > This is somewhat overscripted from madduck ;-) The faxt is, that my > mutt (hg version from Mutt 1.5.20+lxtecppc (2009-08-04) doesn't > interpret neither $@ nor $[0-9]. I'll get over to mutt-dev with > this. I don't understand. mutt has no

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

* green [090909 07:51 -0500] > Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-09 01:10 -0500: > > * green 09.09.2009 > > > Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500: > > > > * Michael Wagner 08.09.2009 > > > > > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009 > > > > > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscri

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

include that > > file. > > You are right, it's only included in unstable "mutt (1.5.20-2)", but the > OP wrote that he works with "iceweasel 3.5" which is in experimental. So > I thought a solution for unstable is ok. Indeed. I suppose ther

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

ou can also make it like this: > > > > settings -> apps -> mailto -> /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt > > But this won't work in Lenny... mutt 1.5.18-6 does not seem to include that > file. You are right, it's only included in unstable "mutt (1.5.20-2)"

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500: > * Michael Wagner 08.09.2009 > > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009 > > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > Apart from my other message you can also make it like this: > > settings -> apps -> mailto -> /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mut

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

* Michael Wagner 08.09.2009 > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009 > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript Apart from my other message you can also make it like this: settings -> apps -> mailto -> /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt Hth Michael -- "Every production of genius must be the pr

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

* Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009 > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > Shellscript: > > #!/bin/sh > exec xterm -e mutt "$@" > > The xterm only pops up for 1 second. > > Any hints? Hello Elimar, in the mutt package is the shellscript /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt, which is th

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

* s. keeling [090907 02:14 +] > Elimar Riesebieter : > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > > > Shellscript: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > exec xterm -e mutt "$@" > > > > The xterm only pops up for 1 second. > > > > Any hints? > > Ben at linuxgazette.net and I've been p

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

Elimar Riesebieter : > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > Shellscript: > > #!/bin/sh > exec xterm -e mutt "$@" > > The xterm only pops up for 1 second. > > Any hints? Ben at linuxgazette.net and I've been playing with this for years (I haven't used it in a while; ca

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:00:13PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > Shellscript: > > #!/bin/sh > exec xterm -e mutt "$@" > > The xterm only pops up for 1 second. I use following in lenny and works fine: -- #!/bin/sh gnome-terminal -e "m

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

* Clive Standbridge [090904 16:47 +0100] > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > > > Shellscript: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > exec xterm -e mutt "$@" > > > > The xterm only pops up for 1 second. > > That's very close to the script that is working for me (using > Iceweasel 3.0.6 o

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

> I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript > > Shellscript: > > #!/bin/sh > exec xterm -e mutt "$@" > > The xterm only pops up for 1 second. That's very close to the script that is working for me (using Iceweasel 3.0.6 on Lenny): #!/bin/sh prefixWords= if

Re: how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

Elimar Riesebieter wrote: I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript Shellscript: #!/bin/sh exec xterm -e mutt "$@" I'm guessing mutt can't parse the mailto: line given out by iceweasel. Here's a very quick and very dirty bit of perl I knocked up; I'm not suggesting it's right, b

how to set up iceweasel 3.5 to use mutt as mailer for "link sendto"

I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript Shellscript: #!/bin/sh exec xterm -e mutt "$@" The xterm only pops up for 1 second. Any hints? Thanks Elimar -- It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:48:28AM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:37:30 +1200, Chris Bannister in > gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:44:47PM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > > [snip] > > >> So how does one use the latest version of this web browser o

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#using > > Doesn't document volatile. Mentions security but doesn't really document it > fully, even through the links provided. (In particular, I couldn't find > what to ad

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:37:30 +1200, Chris Bannister in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:44:47PM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: [snip] >> So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? > > http://glandium.org/blog/?p=391 Thanks for your hard work.

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

In <20090816201911.gb4...@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote: >On Wed,12.Aug.09, 22:31:25, Tim Beauregard wrote: >> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> > Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not >> > updated >> >> [snip] >> >> the contents of this post would make a good F

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:35:56 -0400, Celejar in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:16:15 -0400 > "S. Fishpaste" wrote: > > ... > >> I agree Ron, that T-Bird and to some extent Slypheed-Claws, are good >> examples of GUI e-mail clients that are probably best of breed. I left > >

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:16:15 -0400 "S. Fishpaste" wrote: ... > I agree Ron, that T-Bird and to some extent Slypheed-Claws, are good > examples of GUI e-mail clients that are probably best of breed. I left And what, exactly, is wrong with plain Sylph? :/ Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - rem

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed,12.Aug.09, 22:31:25, Tim Beauregard wrote: > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not > > updated > > [snip] > > the contents of this post would make a good FAQ. http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#using Regards, Andre

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:44:47PM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually run > GNU/Linux headless via CLI. > > I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default > Iceweasel aka Firefox is an older version and I pref

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed,12.Aug.09, 19:35:21, S. Fishpaste wrote: > I used XFce back in the day, now it seems bloated and slow on this P3. I've > also heard it has a nasty memory leak; That has been fixed AFAICT. I also installed Xfce 4.4 on my mothers laptop (p...@1.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM) and it is quite ok. Regar

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

>Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other > e-mail client. The power and flexibility is intoxicating. 8-D I've always rather thought that might be the case. A sense of empowerment is always welcome. Thanks for the suggestion. Open an Xterm window and all will be revealed.

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On 2009-08-14 14:22, S. Fishpaste wrote: On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:18:09 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: On 2009-08-14 10:16, S. Fishpaste wrote: [snip] It's been awhile since I have used T-Bird, but it's a great client. I'm not saying mutt is any better, just that for _me_ s

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:18:09 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-14 10:16, S. Fishpaste wrote: > [snip] >> >> It's been awhile since I have used T-Bird, but it's a great client. I'm not >> saying mutt is any better, just that for _me_ since using mutt, I haven't >> c

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On 2009-08-14 10:16, S. Fishpaste wrote: [snip] It's been awhile since I have used T-Bird, but it's a great client. I'm not saying mutt is any better, just that for _me_ since using mutt, I haven't cared for any other e-mail client. I've tried, but keeping coming back. 8-D And, of course, Mut

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:03:16 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-13 19:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: > [snip] >> >> Yeah I have the preview pane set up similarly. You're quite right about >> being able to delete threads or mark them read, as being sweet. > > Tbird/IW has

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:41:33 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-13 17:22:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: >> Wow talk about copious output, only 4002 lines. > > 4002 is not very much, in particular for a complex application such as > Firefox. This means that Firefox

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On 2009-08-13 19:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: [snip] Yeah I have the preview pane set up similarly. You're quite right about being able to delete threads or mark them read, as being sweet. Tbird/IW has "Mark Thread As Read". The threading is what's the "bees knees" for me. What do you mean? H

Re: Mutt [Was: Iceweasel 3.5]

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:38:31 -0500, Nate Bargmann in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > * S. Fishpaste [2009 Aug 13 11:13 > -0500]: > >> Then when I ran into further questions, mutt-us...@mutt.org was always >> helpful. Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other >> e-mail clie

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-13 17:22:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > Wow talk about copious output, only 4002 lines. 4002 is not very much, in particular for a complex application such as Firefox. This means that Firefox has done almost nothing and a problem occurred very early. > I have no idea what it all means

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:41:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-12 22:52:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:21:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in >> gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: >> > Also, check that you don't have a firefox already running (may

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-13 16:38, Nate Bargmann wrote: * S. Fishpaste [2009 Aug 13 11:13 -0500]: Then when I ran into further questions, mutt-us...@mutt.org was always helpful. Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other e-mail client. The power and flexibility is intoxicating. 8-D T

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

* S. Fishpaste [2009 Aug 13 11:13 -0500]: > Then when I ran into further questions, mutt-us...@mutt.org was always > helpful. Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other > e-mail client. The power and flexibility is intoxicating. 8-D That and the maddening idea in all of the

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

S. Fishpaste wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:45:03 -0700, Jimmy Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: S. Fishpaste wrote: Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ? Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using these repos if you

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

Brent Clark wrote: Jimmy Johnson wrote: Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using these repos if you want. "deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main" If you going to make a suggestion for a debian based distro, then you might as well just make it Ubuntu.

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:32:40 -0400, Charlie Kroeger in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: >> For e-mail; mutt is my preferred MUA. > > Now there's a thread. > > Know of any clearly written logical progressive steps for setting up mutt or > is it a life's work? Does it require an excessively high IQ fi

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:45:03 -0700, Jimmy Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > S. Fishpaste wrote: > >> Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ? > > > Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using > these repos if you want. > > "de

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Thursday 13 August 2009 04:28:56 pm Brent Clark wrote: > Jimmy Johnson wrote: > > Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using > > these repos if you want. > > > > "deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main" > > Hiya > > If you going to make a suggestion for a debia

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

Jimmy Johnson wrote: Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using these repos if you want. "deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main" Hiya If you going to make a suggestion for a debian based distro, then you might as well just make it Ubuntu. Nothing wrong wi

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

S. Fishpaste wrote: Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ? Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using these repos if you want. "deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main" -- Jimmy Johnson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-12 22:52:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:21:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in > gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > > Also, check that you don't have a firefox already running (maybe > > hidden), otherwise when you run a second instance, it will send a > > message to the

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

> For e-mail; mutt is my preferred MUA. Now there's a thread. Know of any clearly written logical progressive steps for setting up mutt or is it a life's work? Does it require an excessively high IQ fish? -- CK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:21:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-12 19:39:10 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100, Graham in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: [ ...] >> > You're not meant to run ./firefox-bin, you're meant to run ./firef

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:49:07 -0400, Charlie Kroeger in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: >> Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older laptop > > Hummm..well you could try Opera. They have a lighter faster up-to-scratch > browser. LOL Geez browser choice is almost religous

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

In , S. Fishpaste wrote: >On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:31:25 +0100, Tim Beauregard in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: >> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >>> Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not >>> updated >> the contents of this post would make a good FAQ. >Indeed it would.

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:39:10 -0400 "S. Fishpaste" wrote: > > You're not meant to run ./firefox-bin, you're meant to run ./firefox > > Try that and it should work. > > Really ?! > > I had tried that; didn't seem to do anything just exited without > echoing any error message in xterm. Too tired

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-12 19:39:10 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100, Graham in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400 > > "S. Fishpaste" wrote: > > > >> Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially; > >> > >>:~/firefox-3.5.

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:57:19 -0300, Cassiano Leal in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:23 PM, S. > Fishpaste wrote: [ ...] >> I just got Google Chrome going -- OK can't use Flash yet, but at least it's >> pretty fast on this old laptop; faster than on my dual core x64 >>

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:30:47 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > --nextPart4349252.rWh3h2apeg > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition: inline > > In , S. Fishpaste wrote: >>In a normal lapt

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:31:25 +0100, Tim Beauregard in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not updated > > [snip] > > the contents of this post would make a good FAQ. Indeed it would. Is there a cite

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100, Graham in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400 > "S. Fishpaste" wrote: > >> Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially; >> >> :~/firefox-3.5.2$ ./firefox-bin >> ./firefox-bin: error while loading sh

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:53:56 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-12 12:27, S. Fishpaste wrote: [ ...] Yeah I know, nevertheless that's the error message. >>> What *exactly* is the error message? Run it from an xterm (AFTER >>> having removed Lenny's iceweasel

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

> Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older laptop Hummm..well you could try Opera. They have a lighter faster up-to-scratch browser. Put this in your sources.list: deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ sid non-free #apt-get update #apt-get install opera Can't hurt. If y

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not updated [snip] the contents of this post would make a good FAQ. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqDNKw

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

In , S. Fishpaste wrote: >In a normal laptop/workstation GUI environment few applications are as >important as a web browser (especially these days). A web worker for > example relies on a web browser pretty heavily. Not everyone using Debian > is using it on a server, you know. ;-) I have been qu

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

I'd prefer to use >> backports. Wonder why either backports or volatile don't carry the latest >> versions of Iceweasel|Firefox. I thought that was the purpose of those 2 >> sources. > > Somebody has to provide them first. As a general rule, backports are > only made for

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:23 PM, S. Fishpaste wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:26:47 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in > gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: >> On 2009-08-12 10:35:07 +0200, Johan Grönqvist wrote: >>> So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? >>> >>If I were you,

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:39:51 -0500, John Hasler in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > S. Fishpaste writes: >> Speaking of Volatile isn't this the purpose of it; For packages like >> web browsers which are updated frequently ? > > No. It is for packages such as antivirus programs that must be update

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:45:46 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > --nextPart1623703.JhhgrbnWO2 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition: inline > > In , S. Fishpaste wrote: >>Well I was prima

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-12 15:11, Graham wrote: On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400 "S. Fishpaste" wrote: Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially; :~/firefox-3.5.2$ ./firefox-bin ./firefox-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libxul.so: cannot open shared obje

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400 "S. Fishpaste" wrote: > Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially; > > :~/firefox-3.5.2$ ./firefox-bin > ./firefox-bin: error while loading shared libraries: > libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-12 12:27, S. Fishpaste wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:22:16 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: On 2009-08-11 22:04, S. Fishpaste wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: [ ..

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

S. Fishpaste writes: > Speaking of Volatile isn't this the purpose of it; For packages like > web browsers which are updated frequently ? No. It is for packages such as antivirus programs that must be updated frequently to be useful. Upstream hyperactivity does not justify putting a package in v

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

versions of Iceweasel|Firefox. I thought that was the purpose of those 2 > sources. Somebody has to provide them first. As a general rule, backports are only made for packages that are in testing, and Iceweasel 3.5 has not even hit unstable yet. Given that the maintainers of Mozilla packa

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

In , S. Fishpaste wrote: >Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older > laptop and other than wanting an uptodate browser *always* I'd prefer to > use backports. Wonder why either backports or volatile don't carry the > latest versions of Iceweasel|Firefox. I thought that w

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-12 13:23:08 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote: > That's the problem I'm running into Vincent; XUL libs with the > binary I downloaded from Mozilla.org Do you have a $LD_LIBRARY_PATH? -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:22:16 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-11 22:04, S. Fishpaste wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user >> wrote: >>> On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: >> >> [ ...] >> I have checked b

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:52:27 -0400, Charlie Kroeger in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: >> So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? > > > You could put these sources in your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an #apt-get > update > > deb http://ftp.tiscali.nl/debian/ sid main

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

and you have a good reason to want to run > stable, I would instead suggest keeping with stable for almost all apps, > and installing a chroot environment to run the few unstable/experimental > apps you want in a more sandboxed environment. > > As I understand it, I think th

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:26:47 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-12 10:35:07 +0200, Johan Grönqvist wrote: >> So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? >> >>If I were you, I would temporarily enable testing, unstable and >> >>exper

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-12 10:35:07 +0200, Johan Grönqvist wrote: > So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? > >>If I were you, I would temporarily enable testing, unstable and > >>experimental repos, grab iceweasel and dependencies from experimental > >>and then disabling the

rmadison (was: Iceweasel 3.5)

On 2009-08-11 23:19:37 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Use the rmadison command The rmadison command isn't reliable. For instance: $ rmadison subversion subversion | 1.4.2dfsg1-2 | etch-m68k | source, m68k subversion | 1.4.2dfsg1-2 | oldstable | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i38

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

/experimental apps you want in a more sandboxed environment. As I understand it, I think that should be enough for your need. Later, when a proper backport of iceweasel 3.5 arrives, you can use it under stable. I have successfully used this method when I wanted to install stuff form experimental or

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

Charlie Kroeger wrote: > > So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? > > > You could put these sources in your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an #apt-get > update > > deb http://ftp.tiscali.nl/debian/ sid main contrib non-free > > If you have a GUI type package ma

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-11 22:04, S. Fishpaste wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: [ ...] I have checked backports for stable and there doesn't appear to be a 3.5 version, so I got Mozilla's version. Only probl

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

S. Fishpaste wrote: >> If I were you, I would temporarily enable testing, unstable and >> experimental repos, grab iceweasel and dependencies from experimental >> and then disabling the repos. > > Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ? Use the rmadison command

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: [ ...] >> I have checked backports for stable and there doesn't appear to be a 3.5 >> version, so I got Mozilla's version. Only problem it depends on XUL* which >> wasn't

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:17:14 -0300, Cassiano Leal in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: >> That doesn't sound right.  The Mozilla binary should come with the proper >> XUL. > > I agree. AFAIK, the Mozilla binary is completely self-contained, thus

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

> So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ? You could put these sources in your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an #apt-get update deb http://ftp.tiscali.nl/debian/ sid main contrib non-free If you have a GUI type package manager like smartpm it will show a list of all

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: >> >> Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually >> run >> GNU/Linux headless via CLI. >> >> I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default >> Iceweasel

Re: Iceweasel 3.5

On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote: Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually run GNU/Linux headless via CLI. I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default Iceweasel aka Firefox is an older version and I prefer to run the latest. I have

Iceweasel 3.5

Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually run GNU/Linux headless via CLI. I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default Iceweasel aka Firefox is an older version and I prefer to run the latest. I have checked backports for stable and there doe

Re: iceweasel 3.5?

Chris Burkhardt wrote: > Soren Orel wrote: >> When will Iceweasel 3.5 come to Debian Lenny? :P > > A Lenny backport is a step closer, as it was just uploaded to experimental: > > http://glandium.org/blog/?p=391 And even better, Mike Hommey just posted step-by-step instr

Re: iceweasel 3.5?

Soren Orel wrote: > When will Iceweasel 3.5 come to Debian Lenny? :P A Lenny backport is a step closer, as it was just uploaded to experimental: http://glandium.org/blog/?p=391 - Chris B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: iceweasel 3.5?

Thanks a lot Johannes ! 2009/7/2 Johannes Wiedersich > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Duque Gorlois wrote: > > By the way, how could I update Iceweasel browser in order to always > > run a safer version in my machine ? > > > > Is it through "apt-get update" ? > > Yes. The st

Re: iceweasel 3.5?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duque Gorlois wrote: > By the way, how could I update Iceweasel browser in order to always > run a safer version in my machine ? > > Is it through "apt-get update" ? Yes. The stable version of iceweasel gets security updates from debian's security te

Re: iceweasel 3.5?

By the way, how could I update Iceweasel browser in order to always run a safer version in my machine ? Is it through "apt-get update" ? Thanks 2009/7/1 Soren Orel > When will Iceweasel 3.5 come to Debian Lenny? :P > > I hope this bug > > http://bugs.debian.org/

  1   2   >