Re: Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

2012-08-24 Thread Alex Robbins
On 08/24/2012 10:46 AM, Camaleón wrote: El 2012-08-22 a las 15:16 -0500, Alex Robbins escribió: (resending to the list) On 08/22/2012 09:41 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:12:15 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote: A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove had s

Re: Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

2012-08-24 Thread Camaleón
El 2012-08-22 a las 15:16 -0500, Alex Robbins escribió: (resending to the list) > On 08/22/2012 09:41 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:12:15 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote: >> >>> A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove >>> had several security issues. These

Re: Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

2012-08-22 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:12:15 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote: > A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove > had several security issues. These issues were resolved in version > 10.0.6-1 (and a > different version for Squeeze). I notice, however, that while 10.0.6-2 > is ava

Re: Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

2012-08-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-08-21 22:12 +0200, Alex Robbins wrote: > A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove had > several security issues. These issues were resolved in version > 10.0.6-1 > (and a > different version for Squeeze). I notice, however, that while 10.0.6-2 is > available

Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

2012-08-21 Thread Alex Robbins
A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove had several security issues. These issues were resolved in version 10.0.6-1 (and a different version for Squeeze). I notice, however, that while 10.0.6-2 is available in Sid, Wheezy is still at 10.0.5-1. This page [2] (whic