On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:08:25AM +1000, john wrote:
> Fred Bloom wrote:
>
> > Cobalt is a linux ISP out of the box.
> >
> > J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> >
>
> Many people regard Cobalt as a piece of junk aimed at wannabe ISPs. My
> impression
> is that the original poster is
> working for an a
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 04:59:12PM -0800, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:40:37PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:12:17AM -0800, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Bruce Schneier identifi
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 06:51:16PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> ... I'd prefer a modularized, single-app approach to the monolithic
> design of OpenOffice.
Actually I understand OpenOffice is decomposing the monolithic
StarOffice 5x model into single apps.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PR
on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 04:59:12PM -0800, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:40:37PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:12:17AM -0800, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:04:32PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
<.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:40:37PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:12:17AM -0800, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:04:32PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > on Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte
> > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:12:17AM -0800, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:04:32PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > My own experience running GNU/Linux and OpenBSD (2.7) side-by
on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:45:48AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >Most of these boil down to the TCP/IP stack. The *BSD stack is damned
> >good, and the rest of the world drools after it. Linus himself admit
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
>Most of these boil down to the TCP/IP stack. The *BSD stack is damned
>good, and the rest of the world drools after it. Linus himself admits
>that Linux kernel networking code is a mess, and that he's not
>personally a network hacker.
Do y
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:04:32PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:28:36PM -0600, David Batey wrote:
> > > STABILITY: is Debian a good choice for heavy lifting?
> > There are some le
on Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:28:36PM -0600, David Batey wrote:
> > STABILITY: is Debian a good choice for heavy lifting?
>
> There are some legit concerns regarding the Linux kernel as opposed to
> the *BSD kernel
Colin Watson said:
>
> I've prodded [EMAIL PROTECTED] again to remind the relevant people that
> something needs to be done.
cool! thanks. at least i think there should be a warning
somewhere that tells of the problem if there isn't going to
be a fix anytime soon.
> This is basically just a quest
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:49:28PM -0800, nate wrote:
> i can think of one(IMO) glaring security problem in debian,
> that is the (now almost a year old) DOS attack against the
> openbsd ftpd port in debian potato. ive reported it to
> multiple places(including the security list) but never got
> a
David Batey said:
>
> I work at a midwest ISP, and we've got an opportunity to switch
> from an older openBSD to something more recent -- and apparently
> upgrading to the current openBSD might be as much of a chore as
> switching to something entirely different, such as Debian.
i switched a few s
Fred Bloom wrote:
> Cobalt is a linux ISP out of the box.
>
> J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
>
Many people regard Cobalt as a piece of junk aimed at wannabe ISPs. My
impression
is that the original poster is
working for an already established ISP.
They are not secure out of the box, and can be a pa
Cobalt is a linux ISP out of the box.
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
[Please do not waste bandwidth with HTML mail]
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 13:28:36 -0600, David Batey wrote:
I'm with an ISP having about 300 customers who use our servers for DNS,
HTTP, POP, SMTP, and on one server we have FrontP
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:28:36PM -0600, David Batey wrote:
> STABILITY: is Debian a good choice for heavy lifting?
There are some legit concerns regarding the Linux kernel as opposed to
the *BSD kernels as far as heavy lifting goes, but if you're considering
Debian, then you probably feel that
[Please do not waste bandwidth with HTML mail]
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 13:28:36 -0600, David Batey wrote:
> I'm with an ISP having about 300 customers who use our servers for DNS,
> HTTP, POP, SMTP, and on one server we have FrontPage extensions running.
> We're wondering about Debian's scalabilit
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:05:42PM -0500, jeff wrote:
> dear DD,
>
> before you go and delve into the world of new distros, you need only break
> down your whole questionaire into one simple complete thought...
>
> my man, debian is fine for all of your tasks...the real question is, are you
> r
dear DD,
before you go and delve into the world of new distros, you need only break
down your whole questionaire into one simple complete thought...
my man, debian is fine for all of your tasks...the real question is, are you
ready for debian?
DNS, webserver, email, and all the other fun stuff
I work at a midwest ISP, and we've got an opportunity to switchfrom
an older openBSD to something more recent -- and apparentlyupgrading to the
current openBSD might be as much of a chore asswitching to something
entirely different, such as Debian.I realize that is probably a FAQ;
even so th
20 matches
Mail list logo
