Le 27/01/2019 à 22:09, Claudio M a écrit :
Jan 27 20:40:15 my-server systemd[1]: Starting Raise network interfaces...
Jan 27 20:40:20 my-server ifup[489]: Waiting for DAD... Done
Jan 27 20:45:15 my-server systemd[1]: networking.service: Start operation
timed out. Terminating.
Is this what you
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 5:55 PM Pascal Hambourg
wrote:
> Le 27/01/2019 à 16:29, Claudio M a écrit :
> >>
> >> auto eth0
> >> iface eth0 inet static
> >>address a.b.c.d
> >>netmask 255.255.255.224
> >>gateway c.d.e.f
> >>up route add -net a.b.c.x netmask 255.255.255.224 gw c.d
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:07:37PM -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 1/27/19 10:29 AM, Claudio M wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm wondering if anyone came across this recently, because I can't
> >find any bug reports or posts referring to it online (so I'm
> >wondering if I messed something up inadvertenenp8s0t
On 1/27/19 10:29 AM, Claudio M wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone came across this recently, because I can't find
any bug reports or posts referring to it online (so I'm wondering if I
messed something up inadvertenenp8s0tly).
Is /dev/eth0 still viable? Mine is now /dev/enp8s0
ifconfig sho
Le 27/01/2019 à 16:29, Claudio M a écrit :
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address a.b.c.d
netmask 255.255.255.224
gateway c.d.e.f
up route add -net a.b.c.x netmask 255.255.255.224 gw c.d.e.x dev eth0
AFAIK, the gateway must be directly reachable on eth0. But c.d.e.x does
not see
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone came across this recently, because I can't find any
bug reports or posts referring to it online (so I'm wondering if I messed
something up inadvertently).
I have a root server running Stretch 9.7 (fully upgraded) and up until last
night when I rebooted it (previous upt
6 matches
Mail list logo
