Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 10:50:26AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > It isn't Debian. It's that netblock. Try 191.97.36.54. I suspect that works because you are asking a LACNIC whois server for an IP in its own database, so it's not having to contact RIPE's whois, where the rejection seems to be

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

b98:991c:6b9d:c93f:73d:7514 > > % This is the RIPE Database query service. […] > > %ERROR:201: access denied for 190.112.52.14 > > % > > % Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of > > controlled objects. > > % Access

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

other example of this error message. What more have we learned? > %ERROR:201: access denied for 168.121.184.15 > I have nothing to do with 168.121.184.15. Like I said, these things will be reverse proxies inside the infrastructure of LACNIC or RIPE. inetnum: 168.121.184.0/22 owner:

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

It isn't Debian. It's that netblock. Try 191.97.36.54. Also try whois -r 191.96.36.54 -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

:db98:991c:6b9d:c93f:73d:7514 % This is the RIPE Database query service. […] %ERROR:201: access denied for 190.112.52.14 % % Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of controlled objects. % Access from your host has been temporarily denied. % For

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See https://docs.db.ripe.net/terms-conditions.html %ERROR:201: access denied for 190.112.52.14 % % Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of controlled objects. % Access from your host has been tem

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

vi...@wlcr.net writes: > here's a new one of the same problem: > $ whois 191.96.36.52 It's anything in 191.96. 190.112.52.14 seems to belong to LACNIC. Seems unlikely but it looks like RIPE is blocking them. I don't know why the query goes first to LACNIC and then to RIPE. I don't think it's

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

acks or .. whatever. You also get their abuse contact info so you know where to direct emails about abusive behavior from that ip address range. If whois will look up handles you can lookup the abuse handle. I can't figure out how to do that so https://search.arin.net/rdap/?q

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

ers registrations %  By submitting a whois query, you agree to use this data %  only for lawful purposes. %  2024-11-27 04:12:26 (-03 -03:00) inetnum: 190.112.52.0/22 status:  assigned aut-num: AS aut-num: AS264845 owner:   LACNIC - Latin American and Caribbean IP addres

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

t slightly different error message. > > tmb@hp-debian:~$ whois 191.96.36.56 > % IP Client: 2607:fb90:db98:991c:6b9d:c93f:73d:7514 > % This is the RIPE Database query service. > % The objects are in RPSL format. > % > % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. &g

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

ct to Terms and Conditions. % See https://docs.db.ripe.net/terms-conditions.html %ERROR:201: access denied for 190.112.52.14 % % Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of controlled objects. % Access from your host has been temporarily denied. % For more information, see % http

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

to get help. # NetRange: 191.0.0.0 - 191.255.255.255 CIDR: 191.0.0.0/8 NetName:NET191 NetHandle: NET-191-0-0-0-0 Parent: () NetType:Allocated to LACNIC OriginAS: Organization: Latin American and Caribbean IP address Regional Registry (LACNIC) Re

WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Can anyone explain why whois on a Debian server gets a rejection as if through a proxy server? Does the Debian command "whois" not connect directly to the various databases? $whois 191.96.36.56 % IP Client: 64.25x.xx.xx  % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL fo

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

Hello, On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:49:32PM +0200, Detlef Vollmann wrote: > The only thing that's always annoying is that too many programs > believe they have to overwrite /etc/resolv.conf... chattr +i # immutable still works :)

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 2024-07-06, George at Clug wrote: >> What I really need is a good book >> or document that explains the design >> and implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on >> modern Debian GNU/Linux systems.  Recommendations? > > Sadly I have not found any documentation (or books) f

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 21:51:09 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > What I really need is a good book or document that explains the design and > implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on modern > Debian GNU/Linux systems. Recommendations? The main thing to understand is that

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/6/24 06:51, David Christensen wrote: The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console network administration skills have been rendered obsolete by systemd and NetworkManager. I don't think that these skills are obsolete. I still use /etc/network/interfaces for everythi

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/6/24 06:37, jeremy ardley wrote: As I said in my earlier post, it's not necessary to disable dhcpd and in fact it is likely undesirable. Note that the warning in the wiki talks about dhcpcd, not about dhcpd. Though as a pointed out before, your machine very likely will have NetworkManag

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

erface with DHCP and a development LAN with a static IP address. So disabling DHCP may cause additional problems and will solve none. Detlef

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

work-bridge_configuring-and-managing-networking#configuring-a-network-bridge-using-nmcli-commands_configuring-a-network-bridge https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/linux-on-systems?topic=choices-kvm-default-nat-based-networking https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Libvirtd_and_dnsmasq https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Network

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 6/7/24 12:51, David Christensen wrote: What I really need is a good book or document that explains the design and implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on modern Debian GNU/Linux systems.  Recommendations? If you want to persist with the NetworkManager approach,

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/5/24 19:06, Max Nikulin wrote: On 7/5/24 21:14, George at Clug wrote: Thank you for your replies. The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console network administration skills have been rendered obsolete by systemd and NetworkManager. I typically install Xfce whe

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 6/7/24 09:16, David Christensen wrote: I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding disabling DHCP when using a static IP: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/sect.network-config.en.html#sect.interface-ethernet As I said in my earlier post, it

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

David, How are your efforts toward setting a static IP address going? Have you succeeded. I set up a lot of test servers (for fun and no profit), and hence work with Hypervisors (KVM more than Virtual Box), and have some experience in this area. But at this point I am not sure if you need

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 06/07/2024 08:16, David Christensen wrote: I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding disabling DHCP when using a static IP: [...] https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration?action=info The following sentence: "Make sure to disable all DHCP services, e.g. dh

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/4/24 21:08, Felix Miata wrote: On 7/4/24 21:10, jeremy ardley wrote: On 7/5/24 11:44, Franco Martelli wrote: Thank you all for the replies. I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding disabling DHCP when using a static IP: https://www.debian.org/doc/ma

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

method to "disable all DHCP services"? You can also keep your virtual machine configured to request an IP address from your DHCP server and configure the server to send the IP address that you wish. All you need to know it's the NIC's MAC address of your virtual machine,

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 5/7/24 13:13, jeremy ardley wrote: On 5/7/24 10:30, Felix Miata wrote: I think there are more than one. One thing is to check what is enabled, then disable or uninstall whatever owns the unit(s): systemctl list-unit-files | egrep 'net|dhcp' Do the same with whatever "manages" /etc

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 5/7/24 10:30, Felix Miata wrote: I think there are more than one. One thing is to check what is enabled, then disable or uninstall whatever owns the unit(s): systemctl list-unit-files | egrep 'net|dhcp' Do the same with whatever "manages" /etc/resolv.conf, and create a regular fil

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 5/7/24 10:06, David Christensen wrote: The Debian wiki also says: "Make sure to disable all DHCP services, e.g. dhcpcd." What is the correct method to "disable all DHCP services"? The instruction is not necessary. It doesn't matter if there is a dhcp server anywhere if the client -

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

ur own design. >> I don't use VMs, but I did several hours ago instruct several hours ago using >> systemd-network to setup static IP service for a *buntu user who couldn't get >> netplan sorted: >> <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/netplan-ap

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

n't get netplan sorted: <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/netplan-apply-no-longer-setting-static-ip-address-4175738702/#post6512274> I've been using systemd-network static IPs on everything for several years, including Bullseye. 2024-07-04 20:15:43 root@laalaa ~

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

etup static IP service for a *buntu user who couldn't get netplan sorted: <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/netplan-apply-no-longer-setting-static-ip-address-4175738702/#post6512274> I've been using systemd-network static IPs on everything for several years, incl

Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

debian-user: I have built a VirtualBox virtual machine and installed Debian 11 with SSH server and standard system utilities only. I plan to use the VM to run the UniFi Network Controller to manage the UniFi equipment on my SOHO LAN: root@unifi:~# cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a 11.10 Li

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

loud.com/csm/en-dedicated-servers-network-bridging?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0043731#step-4-configure-the-virtual-machines > > |ADDITIONAL_IP can be any single IP you purshased, and you see the netmask > set to| > > |255.255.255.255 There is no mention to the

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

On 10/31/23 16:46, Dan Ritter wrote: Mihamina RKTMB wrote: On 10/31/23 01:18, Dan Ritter wrote: Mihamina RKTMB wrote: But isn't there a way to make the Debian installer accept that the gateway is not in the subnet of the set IP address? No. [OVH docs reference omitted] You as

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

Hi. On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Marco M. wrote: > > Maybe you need to help the installer along, and set the default route > > for the machine? Perhaps using an alternate virtual terminal, like > > FN+F5. I believe the command is `route add defa

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

Mihamina RKTMB wrote: > > On 10/31/23 01:18, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Mihamina RKTMB wrote: > > > But isn't there a way to make the Debian installer accept that the gateway > > > is not in the subnet of the set IP address? > > No. [OVH docs reference om

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

t to| |255.255.255.255 There is no mention to the host (VMWare) IP address in the VM | || ||

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

addr add $IP/32 dev eth0" - set the traffic to the gateway to go through the NIC: "ip route add $GW dev eth0" - set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via $GW" As I set the IP address to a /32, the gateway is not (never) in the subnet of

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

Am 31.10.2023 um 08:35:48 Uhr schrieb Henning Follmann: > Of course not! Some host _on_your_subnet_ must be responsible for > forwarding the packages. It is possible to define another specific direct connected route to your router and use that with source addresses that are not on the same subnet

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 06:17:18PM +0300, Mihamina RKTMB wrote: > Hi all, > > I rent a dedicated server where I installed an hypervisor and purchased > failover public IPv4 IPs routed to that server. > Of course not! Some host _on_your_subnet_ must be responsible for forwarding the packages. And

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

eason for that failure, as that case is uncommon in most networks. > Maybe you need to help the installer along, and set the default route > for the machine? Perhaps using an alternate virtual terminal, like > FN+F5. I believe the command is `route add default gw {IP-ADDRESS} > {INTER

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

t;ip addr add $IP/32 dev eth0" > > - set the traffic to the gateway to go through the NIC: "ip route add $GW > dev eth0" > > - set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via > $GW" > > As I set the IP address to a /32, th

Re: Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

to /32: "ip addr add $IP/32 dev eth0" > > - set the traffic to the gateway to go through the NIC: "ip route add > $GW dev eth0" > > - set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via > $GW" > > As I set the IP address to a /3

Debian installer refuses to setup IP address if gateway is no in the same subnet

eway to go through the NIC: "ip route add $GW dev eth0" - set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via $GW" As I set the IP address to a /32, the gateway is not (never) in the subnet of the VM. When using the Debian installer, at the networking

Re: Debian Wiki IP Address Unban Request

> Who should I contact next on a private channel to get my IP unbanned? Thank > you very much. >From <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact>: Access to wiki.debian.org is blocked with 403 Forbidden Please mail w...@debian.org with your IP address

Debian Wiki IP Address Unban Request

Dear Debian mailing list, I purchased a vps to use as my vpn server, and found out that it was black listed from the https://wiki.debian.org/ website. I am currently using Bookworm, and would love to be able to visit the wiki with my vpn. Who should I contact next on a private channel to get my I

Re: blocking 465 connections to mail server for specific IP address without using fail2ban

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The script needs more work it is not exim4-exploiters, it is for repeated failed logins. As it is now, it will treat any single failure as one to ban and that is only going to cause trouble. Although users should be logged in normally and will

Re: blocking 465 connections to mail server for specific IP address without using fail2ban

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Slightly improved shell script, uses iprange once and conflates both lists together. #!/bin/bash declare -a tcp25_set tcp465_set tcp_25_465_set banned_ports_list=25,465,993,995 logwatch_file=/var/log/exim4/logwatch-email-20190622a.eml # NB ipr

Re: blocking 465 connections to mail server for specific IP address without using fail2ban

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 22/6/19 6:24 pm, john doe wrote: >> I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks >> from delivering email to my server with entries in the >> /etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file. >> >> Is there any config file that I can

Re: blocking 465 connections to mail server for specific IP address without using fail2ban

> Hi, > > I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks from > delivering email to my server with entries in the > /etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file. > > Is there any config file that I can easily use to block 465 login > attempts from bad IP addresses and CIDR blocks? > > If t

blocking 465 connections to mail server for specific IP address without using fail2ban

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks from delivering email to my server with entries in the /etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file. Is there any config file that I can easily use to block 465 login attempts from bad IP

Re: Get the timezone from an IP address

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 08:34:36PM +0100, André Rodier wrote: On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 21:57 +0300, Mindaugas Celiesius wrote: Did you check this? https://packages.debian.org/stretch/geoip-bin > Hi, > > Is there any way - or Debian package - to know the timezone from an IP > address,

Re: Get the timezone from an IP address

On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 15:03 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:43:58PM +0100, André Rodier wrote: > > Is there any way - or Debian package - to know the timezone from an IP > > address, or at least from a country? I have successfully used the geoip > >

Re: Get the timezone from an IP address

On 08/05/2019 19:43, André Rodier wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way - or Debian package - to know the timezone from an IP > address, or at least from a country? I have successfully used the geoip > databases to get the country, so I could use the main city as an > approxim

Re: Get the timezone from an IP address

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:43:58PM +0100, André Rodier wrote: Is there any way - or Debian package - to know the timezone from an IP address, or at least from a country? I have successfully used the geoip databases to get the country, so I could use the main city as an approximation. I would

Re: Get the timezone from an IP address

Did you check this? https://packages.debian.org/stretch/geoip-bin > Hi, > > Is there any way - or Debian package - to know the timezone from an IP > address, or at least from a country? I have successfully used the geoip > databases to get the country, so I could use the

Re: [OT] IP address collisions

Dan Purgert writes: > Nicholas Geovanis wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Stone wrote: >> >>> >>> No, the ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918 space--you can use it >>> internally without central registration by choosing a subnet from >>> fd00::/8. The space is so much larger th

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 8:29 AM Michael Stone wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:12:04AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > >But isn't it irrelevant whether they pick the same prefix or not? Routers > that > >respect ULA and RFC1918 shouldn't route any traffic destined to them off > the > >logical

Re: [OT] IP address collisions

Le 18/04/2019 à 14:52, Michael Stone a écrit : On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:37:36PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: A properly generated IPv6 ULA (Unique Local Address) prefix is unlikely to have collisions. A randomly selected subnet from 10/8 is also *unlikely* to have collisions. The proba

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Stone wrote: > >> >> No, the ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918 space--you can use it >> internally without central registration by choosing a subnet from >> fd00::/8. The space i

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:12:04AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: But isn't it irrelevant whether they pick the same prefix or not? Routers that respect ULA and RFC1918 shouldn't route any traffic destined to them off the logical subnet. Right? If it didn't matter, people wouldn't keep looking

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Stone wrote: > > No, the ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918 space--you can use it > internally without central registration by choosing a subnet from > fd00::/8. The space is so much larger that it's much less likely that > two sites would pick the same

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:06:05PM -, Curt wrote: On 2019-04-17, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Le 17/04/2019 à 18:42, Michael Stone a écrit : On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:10:56 -0400 Michael Stone wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:43AM -04

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:37:36PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Le 17/04/2019 à 18:42, Michael Stone a écrit : On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:10:56 -0400 Michael Stone wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:43AM -0400, Celejar wrote: I was ra

Re: [OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

On 2019-04-17, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 17/04/2019 à 18:42, Michael Stone a écrit : >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote: >>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:10:56 -0400 Michael Stone >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:43AM -0400, Celejar wrote: >I was rather

[OT] IP address collisions (was: Accessing a host with variable IP addresses / connection types)

Le 17/04/2019 à 18:42, Michael Stone a écrit : On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:10:56 -0400 Michael Stone wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:43AM -0400, Celejar wrote: >I was rather shocked to see that there was no definitive solution to >avoi

Re: get my ip address

tony; I am aware that I can call ip a and parse the result. [...] Is there any other way to obtain this data, maybe from /sys? just call libc.getifaddrs() directly. * http://programmaticallyspeaking.com./getting-network-interfaces-in-python.html

Re: get my ip address

On 20/02/2019 13:24, Dan Ritter wrote: > tony wrote: >> This thread has now drifted from my asking whether there was any way of >> interrogating the hardware to obtain the current IP6 address of host - >> apparently not > > The hardware doesn't know IP addresses. The kernel knows those. > > $ i

Re: get my ip address

tony wrote: > This thread has now drifted from my asking whether there was any way of > interrogating the hardware to obtain the current IP6 address of host - > apparently not The hardware doesn't know IP addresses. The kernel knows those. $ ip -6 a show eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 state UP qlen 10

Re: get my ip address

On 19/02/2019 17:36, Dan Ritter wrote: > tony wrote: >> On 19/02/2019 16:10, Greg Wooledge wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:11:29AM +0100, tony wrote: Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> may offer som

Re: get my ip address

On Sat 16 Feb 2019 at 11:16:23 (+0100), tony wrote: > On 15/02/2019 16:52, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 12:02:20 (+0100), Markus Schönhaber wrote: > >> Tony, 15.2.2019, 11:11:29 +0100: > >> > >>> Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. > >>> > >>> I am aware

Re: get my ip address

On Sun 17 Feb 2019 at 12:51:34 (+0900), John Crawley wrote: > On 16/02/2019 14.28, David Wright wrote: > > On Sat 16 Feb 2019 at 11:10:32 (+0900), John Crawley wrote: > > > On 16/02/2019 08.54, David Wright wrote: > > > > On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 22:04:42 (+), Darac Marjal wrote: > > > > > If you'

Re: get my ip address

t-hooks.d directory and let it use the new_ip_address environment variable. The example is right there on the wiki page. Just replace /usr/local/sbin/dync with your python program (assuming it takes the IP address on the argument list). Oh... wait, you said IPv6 in the original message, right?

Re: get my ip address

On 19/02/2019 17:36, Dan Ritter wrote: > tony wrote: >> On 19/02/2019 16:10, Greg Wooledge wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:11:29AM +0100, tony wrote: Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> may offer som

Re: get my ip address

tony wrote: > On 19/02/2019 16:10, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:11:29AM +0100, tony wrote: > >> Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. > > > > Why? > > > > may offer some insight. > > > > Well, I'm sure you

Re: get my ip address

On 19/02/2019 16:10, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:11:29AM +0100, tony wrote: >> Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. > > Why? > > may offer some insight. > Well, I'm sure you don't really want to know, and I

Re: get my ip address

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:11:29AM +0100, tony wrote: > Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. Why? may offer some insight.

Re: get my ip address

On 16/02/2019 14.28, David Wright wrote: On Sat 16 Feb 2019 at 11:10:32 (+0900), John Crawley wrote: On 16/02/2019 08.54, David Wright wrote: On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 22:04:42 (+), Darac Marjal wrote: If you're going to recommend parsing `ip`, the -j option may be more amenable to scripting.

Re: get my ip address

then > post-process it with jq to filter it to different JSON, and then > parse it in a shell, rather than just parsing something as simple as > the oneline format using the tools that every system has installed > (like grep, sed). Because JSON gives a standard way to markup data. Grep and

Re: get my ip address

On 15/02/2019 16:52, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 12:02:20 (+0100), Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> Tony, 15.2.2019, 11:11:29 +0100: >> >>> Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. >>> >>> I am aware that I can call ip a and parse the result. The parsing, >>> whilst

Re: get my ip address

On Sat 16 Feb 2019 at 11:10:32 (+0900), John Crawley wrote: > On 16/02/2019 08.54, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 22:04:42 (+), Darac Marjal wrote: > > > If you're going to recommend parsing `ip`, the -j option may be more > > > amenable to scripting. (JSON output) > > > > > > O

Re: get my ip address

On 16/02/2019 08.54, David Wright wrote: On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 22:04:42 (+), Darac Marjal wrote: If you're going to recommend parsing `ip`, the -j option may be more amenable to scripting. (JSON output) On 15/02/2019 15:52, David Wright wrote: On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 12:02:20 (+0100), Markus

Re: get my ip address

On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 22:04:42 (+), Darac Marjal wrote: > If you're going to recommend parsing `ip`, the -j option may be more > amenable to scripting. (JSON output) > > On 15/02/2019 15:52, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 12:02:20 (+0100), Markus Schönhaber wrote: > >> Tony, 15.

Re: get my ip address

If you're going to recommend parsing `ip`, the -j option may be more amenable to scripting. (JSON output) On 15/02/2019 15:52, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 12:02:20 (+0100), Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> Tony, 15.2.2019, 11:11:29 +0100: >> >>> Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address

Re: get my ip address

On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 12:02:20 (+0100), Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Tony, 15.2.2019, 11:11:29 +0100: > > > Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. > > > > I am aware that I can call ip a and parse the result. The parsing, > > whilst quite achievable, is slightly tricky, but

Re: get my ip address

Tony, 15.2.2019, 11:11:29 +0100: > Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. > > I am aware that I can call ip a and parse the result. The parsing, > whilst quite achievable, is slightly tricky, but I can manage the RE, so > that's not my question. > > Is there any other wa

Re: get my ip address

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:11:29AM +0100, tony wrote: > Hi all, > > Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. You don't have "an IP address". Your host has, and it has zero or more (potentially many) IP addresses. With IPV6, you'll almost certai

get my ip address

Hi all, Debian 9. I need to read my IPv6 address into a python script. I am aware that I can call ip a and parse the result. The parsing, whilst quite achievable, is slightly tricky, but I can manage the RE, so that's not my question. Is there any other way to obtain this data, maybe from /sys?

Re: Outgoing email with exim, was Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

On 2018-07-04 04:40, Mike McClain wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:42:15PM -0500, David Wright wrote: On Tue 03 Jul 2018 at 08:52:22 (-0700), Mike McClain wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:17:27PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > Should anyone reading this know hjow to get exim4 to co

Re: Outgoing email with exim, was Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:42:15PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 03 Jul 2018 at 08:52:22 (-0700), Mike McClain wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:17:27PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > > Should anyone reading this know hjow to get exim4 to connect to > > outbound.att.net I'd lo

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

On Tue 03 Jul 2018 at 19:59:18 (+0200), Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 03/07/2018 à 02:42, David Wright a écrit : > >On Mon 02 Jul 2018 at 21:58:15 (+0200), john doe wrote: > > > >>It could be that the ISP router went into "bridge mode" (router > >>function was disabled). > > > >Which is rather worryi

Outgoing email with exim, was Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

et with allowed IP range as 192.168.1.64 through 192.168.1.253, > > which was set by the T&T installer when we switched to a fiber optic > > network. > > > > Further examination of the modem settings showed IP Passthrough > > status as on (Public IP Address), which w

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

Le 03/07/2018 à 02:42, David Wright a écrit : On Mon 02 Jul 2018 at 21:58:15 (+0200), john doe wrote: It could be that the ISP router went into "bridge mode" (router function was disabled). Which is rather worrying as you are exposed to the Internet without any security. Why "without any se

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

On 2018-07-03, Mike McClain wrote: > > Should anyone reading this know hjow to get exim4 to connect to > outbound.att.net I'd love to hear about it. > There's the (perhaps outdated) wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/ATTUverseExim4 Maybe you are already aware of the wiki.

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

t by the T&T installer when we switched to a fiber optic > network. > > Further examination of the modem settings showed IP Passthrough > status as on (Public IP Address), which was, in fact the IP. ATT tech support demonstrated to me that they can change the settings remotely.

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

On Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:53:27 +0100 Jeremy Nicoll wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, at 07:19, john doe wrote: > > > You are correct in the case of an ADSL "router". > > > > Sadly, in the case of my European ISP I'm stuck with what they give > > me! I must say that I've never investigated how I could

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, at 07:19, john doe wrote: > You are correct in the case of an ADSL "router". > > Sadly, in the case of my European ISP I'm stuck with what they give me! > I must say that I've never investigated how I could use my own cable > modem and understand the kind of restriction they'

Re: Strange LAN IP Address.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:19:44AM +0200, john doe wrote: [...] > You are correct in the case of an ADSL "router". > > Sadly, in the case of my European ISP I'm stuck with what they give me! There are people working on exactly that. One example:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >