splay only garbage when receiving such a
message), and a command to peek whether someone is offline or just hiding.
It also has better debugging capabilities than any other ICQ client.
However, if you're in need of MSN/Yahoo/AIM/other protocols, those aren't
supported... :-/
Yours,
>--[Meir Kriheli]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> I use sim-icq. It's really good, supports version 8 of ICQ protocol (ICQ 2001)
> with lots of other features as well. It is a qt/kde app, and they have a deb
> for download in the downloads se
on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:27:19PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:03:18PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > ;) no really though, thanks. give me text over gui any day!
> > (dude, whoever thought that phrase would pass my lips ...)
> >
>
> And should you need to move
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:03:18PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> ;) no really though, thanks. give me text over gui any day! (dude,
> whoever thought that phrase would pass my lips ...)
>
And should you need to move to X, I hear that 'screen' works well in
xterm/kterm/gnome-terminal/eterm...
on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:28:58PM -0600, Michael Heironimus insinuated:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:24:26PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > now, after all of that, i have centericq v4.8.4 up and running, and
> > it's still buggy. the AIM protocol hates me:
>
> > anyone have any suggestions?
>
> I
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:24:26PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> now, after all of that, i have centericq v4.8.4 up and running, and
> it's still buggy. the AIM protocol hates me:
> anyone have any suggestions?
I suggest trying the current version (4.8.7) instead of that old one.
There may or m
on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:44:23AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen insinuated:
> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:37:34PM +, Colin Watson insinuated:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > > okay, this is good to know. i guess then my /etc/apt/sources.list is
> > > borked? because i
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:44:23AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> wa-hoo! of course ... didn't even think to look there. changed to
> 644 (btw, can anyone enlighten me on specifying the first bit (*0*644)
> all the time? i never have, and haven't had any problems), and all
> works.
Cool.
As fo
on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:37:34PM +, Colin Watson insinuated:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > okay, this is good to know. i guess then my /etc/apt/sources.list is
> > borked? because i get this every time:
> >
> > orange:~> apt-get source centericq -t unsta
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 05:04:38PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated:
> > apt-get install won't let you do it as a user, but apt-get source will
> > download the source - this is because you're not actually installing
> > anything to the sy
on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 05:04:38PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated:
> This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said:
> > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated:
> > > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't
> > > need to be root, either.
> >
> > well
This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said:
> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated:
> > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't
> > need to be root, either.
>
> well, i have needed to be of late, and just haven't worried about it
> recently
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated:
> > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't
> > need to be root, either.
>
> well, i have needed to be of late, and just haven't worried about
on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated:
> Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't
> need to be root, either.
well, i have needed to be of late, and just haven't worried about it
recently ... whenever i try to run apt as myself, i get the following:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:32:01PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:14:38PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated:
> > Download the latest source package with "apt-get source centericq"
> > from unstable
>
> okay, got thus far ...
>
> > and roll it with "dpkg-buildpackage -us -
on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:42:25PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated:
> You have to be in the top level directory of the source, so for
> centericq from unstable, that would be centericq-4.8.7, I'm
> guessing.
pardon the ignorance, but where's the "top level directory" for
centericq-4.8.7?
> No need t
This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said:
> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:14:38PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > > however, as i pointed out in an earlier thread, i've never gotten it
> > > to work right with the AIM prot
on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:14:38PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > however, as i pointed out in an earlier thread, i've never gotten it
> > to work right with the AIM protocol. sean, if you get it working,
> > want to come look
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> however, as i pointed out in an earlier thread, i've never gotten it
> to work right with the AIM protocol. sean, if you get it working,
> want to come look at mine? :)
>
>
Download the latest source package with "apt-get source
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> what i'm most interested in is a text-only aim clone though. gaim is
> nice and all, but on my desktop it's aesthetically horrible with all
> those big fonts and buttons (which can be reduced somewhat, but not
> completely). also, bec
on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:57:54PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> > what i'm most interested in is a text-only aim clone though. gaim
> > is nice and all, but on my desktop it's aesthetically horrible
> > with all those big fonts an
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> what i'm most interested in is a text-only aim clone though. gaim is
> nice and all, but on my desktop it's aesthetically horrible with all
> those big fonts and buttons (which can be reduced somewhat, but not
> completely). also, bec
heli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've
> > > checked out gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:44:43 +
Meir Kriheli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've
> > checked out gaim, licq & kicq2.
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the
> original windows client?
>
> Thanks in ad
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:49:49PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports MSN
> and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either flakey
> (at best) ICQ support or no MSN support (yes, some of my friends are
> lame;).
The Debian p
> "Rob" == Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports
Rob> MSN and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either
Rob> flakey (at best) ICQ support or no MSN support (yes, some of my
Rob> friends are lame;).
Jabber
Thanks for your kindness.
(B
(BK.H.
(B
(BJeremy Nickurak wrote:
(B
(B>http://www.jabber.org/user/publicservers.php
(B>
(B>There's several in that list, if you weren't aware of it by now.
(B>
(B>That said, it's relatively easy to operate your own server, although
(B>you'll need a fully qu
http://www.jabber.org/user/publicservers.php
There's several in that list, if you weren't aware of it by now.
That said, it's relatively easy to operate your own server, although
you'll need a fully qualified domain name if you want your server to be
able to talk to other servers.
On Tue, 2002-
>
(B>
(B>Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports MSN
(B>and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either flakey
(B>(at best) ICQ support or no MSN support (yes, some of my friends are
(B>lame;).
(B>
(B>
(BNot yet. Please tell me what it is and a U
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:11:32PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
>
> > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones,
on Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:25:30PM +0100, Rüdiger Kuhlmann insinuated:
> For a terminal ICQ, try mICQ (the cvs version even has support for
> UTF8 messages, the first OSS ICQ client doing so). Or centericq if
> you depend on multiple protocols.
heh. i got centericq because i wanted ICQ a
Thanks everyone that responded!
I've looked at the ones I did'nt know about and despite all, my choice fell
on gaim since it's greater capabilities, ie multiple protocols and such.
Pontus
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 19.52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is
>--[Paul Johnson]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance
i've enjoyed using centericq - but i like curses-style interfaces.
On Tue, 12 Nov
2002, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
>
> > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the
> original windows client?
In my experience GnomeICU tend
At 2002-11-12T18:52:30Z, Pontus Edvardsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> gaim, licq & kicq2.
I like GAIM, mainly for its ability to support many different IM systems. I
have one ICQ, two AIM, a
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the
> original windows client?
My personal favorite is centeri
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
> gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the
> original windows client?
I think licq is the best
Hi all,
What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out
gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the
original windows client?
Thanks in advance,
Pontus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &qu
; again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
>
> I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
> to work, but that seems both iffy, and difficult, since I don't have a
&
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:42:51PM +0100, Petter Isaksson wrote:
> Randy Orrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem that I've had with every ICQ client I've tried is that they
> > keep my demand dialed ppp connection alive -- is there one that will
>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:33:46PM +0100, Alex the Koala wrote (0.54):
> add my two cents here: try using gaim *without* the ICQ plugin. ICQ2000b
> just runs the AOL protocol which gaim handles well. Set protocol to
> Oscar, auth host login.icq.com on port 5190.
I'll have to keep this in mind for
ns get delivered
> > again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> > messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
>
> I've had that problem for a while now, but I just grabbed licq 1.0.4
> from unstable and it seems to fix that problem nic
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Rob Weir wrote:
> The thing to remember tho, is that this is AOLs fault; they keep
> updating the protocol in (what seems to be) a non-backward compatible
> fashion.
Gotta love flag-day updates...
> Arggghhh, have you seen the recent version of Mirabilis ICQ? It's not
> the
; again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
I've had that problem for a while now, but I just grabbed licq 1.0.4
from unstable and it seems to fix that problem nicely. Apparently
1.0.4 will be the last versio
this is a problem when you have 20+ messages that come in
> > everytime you start your ICQ client).
>
> This is not a bug with licq, this is a problem with AOL. AOL
> is attempting to kill ICQ off by making it as unreliable as
> possible. Annoy AOL if this bothers you.
That&
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:13:09AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson insinuated:
> >
> > What exactly is ytalk?
>
> version of it. scrolls text instead of wrapping it; doesn't show
> random old english and runic characters for delete symbols on another
> termi
on Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:13:09AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson insinuated:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
>
> > oh, i am a talk *geek*, and use it all the time on my school's student
> > server. it's how i kept in touch with half my friends who were abroad
> > this past semester! (ytal
Randy Orrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem that I've had with every ICQ client I've tried is that they
> keep my demand dialed ppp connection alive -- is there one that will
The problem here is that the icq-client needs to send keep-alive
packets (every 9
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:19:12AM -0500, dman wrote:
> (FWIW UNIX had the first IM called 'talk', too bad I never see it used
> anymore (in fact, I can't get it to work at school))
What about write(1)? That came before talk didn't it? And is more similar
to an IM IMO. :)
Pete
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Erik Andreas Fjogstad Brandstadmoen wrote:
> Why not go for the original ICQ? For Java, that is. Works nicely.
> http://www.icq.com/download/ftp-java.html
Other than it's bloated, resource intensive, slow and buggy?
--
Baloo
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I've build a licq CVS Snapshot a few days ago and it works very well.
> It supports the new protocol, has a little bit modified QT plugin etc.
I've seen the new QT plugin, it seems to be in unstable, but licq is
still flaking on ICQ.
--
Baloo
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, dman wrote:
> Doesn't [y]talk allow communicating with remote machines as well?
Yes.
--
Baloo
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:05:54AM -0500, Brian Clark wrote:
> * Benjamin Sommerfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 18. 2002 02:59]:
> > They changed the protocol in their new Windows Client so none of the
> > old clients is usable and there's no open source implementation of the
> > new protocol out ye
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Brian Clark wrote:
> * Benjamin Sommerfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 18. 2002 02:59]:
>
> > The only possability to use ICQ these days in Linux is by using a ICQ
> > Java applet on the ICQ page. http://lite.icq.com
>
> > They changed the protocol in their new Windows Client s
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> oh, i am a talk *geek*, and use it all the time on my school's student
> server. it's how i kept in touch with half my friends who were abroad
> this past semester! (ytalk's even better.)
What exactly is ytalk?
--
Baloo
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Not suprised that it's not used much anymore, though... not too many
> multi-user Unix shell hosts left around. I'm lucky to have accounts on
> a couple with large enough user-bases for old school Unix communication
> tools to still be useful.
I really
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, dman wrote:
> Sometimes it is more convenient, and other times it isn't.
> (FWIW UNIX had the first IM called 'talk', too bad I never see it used
> anymore (in fact, I can't get it to work at school))
Talk and write. These aren't as effective since it helps to finger to
see
ges from previous sessions get delivered
> > again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> > messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
>
> Why not go for the original ICQ? For Java, that is. Works nicely.
> http://www.icq.com/download/ftp-j
* Benjamin Sommerfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 18. 2002 02:59]:
> The only possability to use ICQ these days in Linux is by using a ICQ
> Java applet on the ICQ page. http://lite.icq.com
> They changed the protocol in their new Windows Client so none of the
> old clients is usable and there's no
problem when you have 20+
> messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
Why not go for the original ICQ? For Java, that is. Works nicely.
http://www.icq.com/download/ftp-java.html
Erik.
| Erik Brandstadmoen |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMA
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Benjamin Sommerfeld wrote:
> The only possability to use ICQ these days in Linux is by using a ICQ Java
> applet on the ICQ page. http://lite.icq.com
I'm still using ICQ with the old client, just not reliably.
> They changed the protocol in their new Windows Client so none o
s anyone out there use ICQ under Debian? So far I've tried licq and
> > gaim with the ICQ plugin, and both of them have very annoying problems
> > (messages get lost, or messages from previous sessions get delivered
> > again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
problem.
The problem that I've had with every ICQ client I've tried is that they
keep my demand dialed ppp connection alive -- is there one that will
allow me to specify how often to connect (so I can make it longer than
my ppp idle disconnect time), and configure it not to connect if the
connection is down?
Randy
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:40:37PM -0600, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:19:12AM -0500, dman insinuated:
| > Sometimes it is more convenient, and other times it isn't. (FWIW
| > UNIX had the first IM called 'talk', too bad I never see it used
| > anymore (in fact, I can't get it to
on Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:19:12AM -0500, dman insinuated:
> Sometimes it is more convenient, and other times it isn't. (FWIW
> UNIX had the first IM called 'talk', too bad I never see it used
> anymore (in fact, I can't get it to work at school))
oh, i am a talk *geek*, and use it all the time on my
* dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 18. 2002 00:12]:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:51:58PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> | I never understood the appeal of an IM, other than it tells you if
> | someone's online. Email always seemed to be plenty fast enough, and a
> | lot easier to deal with.
[...]
from previous sessions get
> >delivered again on client startup... this is a problem when you have
> >20+ messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
[...]
> I used to use centericq, it is a console app, and I think it's quite
> nice.
I have to second that. If you&
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:19:12AM -0500, dman wrote (1.00):
> (FWIW UNIX had the first IM called 'talk', too bad I never see it used
> anymore (in fact, I can't get it to work at school))
Heh. I use talk all the time, but it's different from IM's... (although
I guess the "chat mode" of ICQ, etc
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:51:58PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
| I never understood the appeal of an IM, other than it tells you if
| someone's online. Email always seemed to be plenty fast enough, and a
| lot easier to deal with.
Emails are better for asynchronous communication. I write a lot
on Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:51:58PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte insinuated:
> I never understood the appeal of an IM, other than it tells you if
> someone's online. Email always seemed to be plenty fast enough, and
> a lot easier to deal with.
different medium, different mode of communication. i have differ
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:56:32PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote (0.50):
> Any client that hasn't been updated yet to use the new protocol will
> have this problem. Some updates are in progress in Debian unstable.
I've been using GnomeICU for the last 4 hours, and it hasn't had the
repeated messages p
; again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
Any client that hasn't been updated yet to use the new protocol will
have this problem. Some updates are in progress in Debian un
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:45:37PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote (0.44):
> This is not a bug with licq, this is a problem with AOL. AOL is
> attempting to kill ICQ off by making it as unreliable as possible.
> Annoy AOL if this bothers you.
Doesn't bother me in the slightest... I'm only using
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, dman wrote:
> | I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
>
> Ugh! That client is really really ugly.
And it wouldn't solve the mis-sends and duplicate messages...my roommate
across the hall and a buddy of mine across town b
rtup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
This is not a bug with licq, this is a problem with AOL. AOL is
attempting to kill ICQ off by making it as unreliable as possible.
Annoy AOL if this bothers you.
> Suggestions would
on Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:11:52AM +0100, marTin insinuated:
> nori, wanna help?
love to. give me a few days to get my life packed up, across the
country, and back to the wired world, and then i'll go wild. :)
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>--
nice.
I used to use GnomeICU (and gaim for aim) which is also pretty. Nice
panel applet too.
| I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
Ugh! That client is really really ugly.
-D
i am using imici http://www.imici.com/, on debian woody - stable ,
had t
ve 20+
messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
to work, but that seems both iffy, and difficult, since I don't have a
Windows machine anymore to steal DLL's from (although I do have a Win98
CD,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:56:46 -0800
Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone out there use ICQ under Debian? So far I've tried licq and
> gaim with the ICQ plugin, and both of them have very annoying problems
> <...>
I am using gaim 0.50 on slackware, I don't think that it wont work
At 04:22 PM 1/17/02 -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:27:39PM -0500, dman wrote (1.00):
>> | I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
>>
>> Ugh! That client is really really ugly.
>
>I don't care so much
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:27:39PM -0500, dman wrote (1.00):
> | I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
>
> Ugh! That client is really really ugly.
I don't care so much about how ugly it is, I just need it to work well.
I'm current
U (and gaim for aim) which is also pretty. Nice
panel applet too.
| I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
Ugh! That client is really really ugly.
-D
--
If we claim we have not sinned, we make Him out to be a liar and His
Word has no place in our lives.
I John 1:10
>
> fishbowl:~> apt-cache search icq
>- centericq - A text-mode icq client based on ncurses
>X everybuddy - An all in one messaging client
>X gaim - GPL clone of AOL Instant Messenger - GTK version
>D gnomeicu - Small, fast and functional clone of Mirabilis' ICQ
delivered
> again on client startup... this is a problem when you have 20+
> messages that come in everytime you start your ICQ client).
yes, i have the same problems with licq. let's go find a new one
together, shall we? i do want a graphical one though that can stick
nicely in one
>
>Suggestions would be very welcome at this point. Unfortunately, the
>suggestion to drop ICQ for another IM is not feasible, due to the
>infamous Circumstances Beyond My Control (tm).
>
>Thanks for any help,
>
>M
Gnome ICU did everything I wanted and more, been a year since I used it
though
me in everytime you start your ICQ client).
I'm considering installing WINE and trying to get the Windows ICQ client
to work, but that seems both iffy, and difficult, since I don't have a
Windows machine anymore to steal DLL's from (although I do have a Win98
CD, so I may be able to
On 20 Nov 2001, Andreas Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 16:09, David Roundy wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:42:50AM +0100, Andreas Leitner wrote:
> > >
> > > Or is there some other icq client in debian that supports the new
> > > protocol?
>
Its interesting that I've observed a lot complain about this...to my knowledge
there are often problems in sending through the ICQ server as opposed to
directly (when using LICQ for instance). I've never heard of any problems
where a Windows client totally refuses messages from a Linux
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 06:01:44PM +0100, Andreas Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 07:45, Dmitriy wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:42:50AM +0100, Andreas Leitner wrote:
[snip]
> Yes - thanks alot, I got it working now. Although I also played with
> ickle. There is no .deb for it yet and
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 07:45, Dmitriy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:42:50AM +0100, Andreas Leitner wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > I have heard rumors that gaim supports the new icq protocl, but when i
> > start it up, i get to the logon screen and am promted for a AOL IM user
> > name + password
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 16:09, David Roundy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:42:50AM +0100, Andreas Leitner wrote:
> >
> > Or is there some other icq client in debian that supports the new
> > protocol?
>
> I've been using licq without any problems.
I am pretty
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:42:50AM +0100, Andreas Leitner wrote:
>
> Or is there some other icq client in debian that supports the new
> protocol?
I've been using licq without any problems.
--
David Roundy
http://civet.berkeley.edu/droundy/
tically.
I hope that helps.
> Or is there some other icq client in debian that supports the new
> protocol?
>
>
> tia,
> Andreas
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Hi,
I am looking for a working ICQ client in debian. gnomicu (which i have
been using till now) does not work well together with the new icq
servers. they are working on implementing the new (v7 or so) protocol,
but it might take some time until they are done.
I have heard rumors that gaim
time. Can someone recommand some stable ICQ
> > client to me running under Gnome. thanx.
>
> apt-get install licq
I have licq and suffer the same. The problem is at the other end. It
also seems that windows client 2001b blocks all others with older
protocols. DNAT'ting direct connections w
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote:
> I am using GnomeICU and find out that it is very unstable. It
> drop message a lot of the time. Can someone recommand some stable ICQ
> client to me running under Gnome. thanx.
apt-get install licq
--
Baloo
> This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any
> suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old Win98
> box, but I keep it around for just that one thing. Please keep me CC'd, as I
> don't subscribe to this list. Thanks.
A great si
On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Nathan Sandver wrote:
> This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any
> suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old
I use MICQ. It's public domain and the latest version (0.3.4) is almost
even stable - at least when i
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
