Lisi Reisz schreef:
> On Tuesday 08 September 2009 17:19:35 Wayne Topa wrote:
>> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 08 September 2009 16:33:00 John Hasler wrote:
Sjoerd writes:
> Yes, but the point of this questin is:
> $ eject -i
> eject: invalid option -- i
"-i" takes an argum
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:33:12AM EDT, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:34:46PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:37:08AM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
[..]
> > > I wrote:
> > > > man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T
> > > > options.
>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:34:46PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:37:08AM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
> > J writes:
> > > How can I regain control of this?
> >
> > I wrote:
> > > man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
> >
> > CJ writes:
>
> > > -
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:37:08AM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
> J writes:
> > How can I regain control of this?
>
> I wrote:
> > man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
>
> CJ writes:
> > -i ?
>
> He's having trouble getting the eject button to work.
I didn't see that
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 17:19:35 Wayne Topa wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 September 2009 16:33:00 John Hasler wrote:
> >> Sjoerd writes:
> >>> Yes, but the point of this questin is:
> >>> $ eject -i
> >>> eject: invalid option -- i
> >>
> >> "-i" takes an argument. man eject
>
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 16:33:00 John Hasler wrote:
Sjoerd writes:
Yes, but the point of this questin is:
$ eject -i
eject: invalid option -- i
"-i" takes an argument. man eject
COMMAND-LINE OPTIONS
-h
This option causes eject to display a brief description of th
On 2009-09-08 10:33 (-0500), John Hasler wrote:
> Sjoerd writes:
>> Yes, but the point of this questin is:
>> $ eject -i
>> eject: invalid option -- i
>
> "-i" takes an argument. man eject
I think there is confusion because Lenny's eject (2.1.5+deb1-4) doesn't
have -i option at all. It's in Sid'
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 16:33:00 John Hasler wrote:
> Sjoerd writes:
> > Yes, but the point of this questin is:
> > $ eject -i
> > eject: invalid option -- i
>
> "-i" takes an argument. man eject
COMMAND-LINE OPTIONS
-h
This option causes eject to display a brief description of the comm
Sjoerd writes:
> Yes, but the point of this questin is:
> $ eject -i
> eject: invalid option -- i
"-i" takes an argument. man eject
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
John Hasler schreef:
J writes:
How can I regain control of this?
I wrote:
man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
CJ writes:
-i ?
He's having trouble getting the eject button to work.
Yes, but the point of this questin is:
$ eject -i
eject: invalid option
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:08:19PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
>
>> I don't care if 'an appication is preventing' or whatever, I want to damned
>> cdrom to eject. I cannot believe that my hardware is being overridden by
>> software. When I hit the eject button, I really don't
J writes:
> How can I regain control of this?
I wrote:
> man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
CJ writes:
> -i ?
He's having trouble getting the eject button to work.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:08:19PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
>
> I don't care if 'an appication is preventing' or whatever, I want to damned
> cdrom to eject. I cannot believe that my hardware is being overridden by
> software. When I hit the eject button, I really don't give a rat's ass what
> someon
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:50:47PM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
> J writes:
> > How can I regain control of this?
>
> man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
-i ?
CJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Joe !
>
> JoeHill wrote:
> > I don't care if 'an appication is preventing' or whatever, I want to damned
> > cdrom to eject. I cannot believe that my hardware is being overridden by
> > software. When I hit the eject button, I really don't give a rat's ass what
> > s
John Hasler wrote:
> J writes:
> > How can I regain control of this?
>
> man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
'eject'? well, that's kind of counterintuitive, isn't it? ;)
Thanks!
--
J
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
J writes:
> How can I regain control of this?
man eject, and pay special attention to the -a, -i, and -T options.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello Joe !
JoeHill wrote:
I don't care if 'an appication is preventing' or whatever, I want to damned
cdrom to eject. I cannot believe that my hardware is being overridden by
software. When I hit the eject button, I really don't give a rat's ass what
someone thinks about it, I want it to eject.
JoeHill wrote:
> I don't care if 'an appication is preventing' or whatever, I want to damned
> cdrom to eject. I cannot believe that my hardware is being overridden by
> software. When I hit the eject button, I really don't give a rat's ass what
> someone thinks about it, I want it to eject.
>
>
I don't care if 'an appication is preventing' or whatever, I want to damned
cdrom to eject. I cannot believe that my hardware is being overridden by
software. When I hit the eject button, I really don't give a rat's ass what
someone thinks about it, I want it to eject.
How can I regain control of
20 matches
Mail list logo
