Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread briand
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> Depends how you did the upgrade - did you use 'apt-get Colin> upgrade' (which probably won't be suitable), 'apt-get Colin> dist-upgrade' (which should work), or something else like Colin> dselect or aptitude? Colin> All of

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread briand
> "Cameron" == Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cameron> On Thursday 23 January 2003 04:45 am, Nicos Gollan wrote: >> On Wednesday 22 January 2003 23:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * >> kernel 2.4.19 has got tdfx compiled in >> >> This might actually be the problem. Remo

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread Cameron Matheson
On Thursday 23 January 2003 04:45 am, Nicos Gollan wrote: > On Wednesday 22 January 2003 23:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > * kernel 2.4.19 has got tdfx compiled in > > This might actually be the problem. Remove the kernel builtin tdfx support > and use the module from drm-trunk-module-src. The DR

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread briand
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> X 4.2 changed the direct rendering architecture somewhat, and Colin> requires an upgrade to kernel 2.4.20. Well I found one minor glitch. The upgrade to testing left xserver-xfree86 at 4.1.0 instead of upgrading it to 4.2.1 al

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:50:09AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Colin> X 4.2 changed the direct rendering architecture somewhat, and > Colin> requires an upgrade to kernel 2.4.20. [Please just reply to the list, not to me as well

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread briand
> "Cameron" == Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cameron> Hi, try removing libglide2 (i think that it actually was Cameron> detrimental to me in the past--i'm not using a voodoo right Cameron> now tho, so i can't check my settings). also, have you Cameron> checked your XF86

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 23:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got a voodoo3 using X DRI which _was_ working just fine > until I "upgraded" to testing. > > Now it's broke. > > Things I _know _ are OK (after all - it _was_ working): > > * kernel 2.4.19 has got tdfx compiled in This might actua

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:38:00PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok - I'll give it a try. > > Thanks for the info. > > Incidentally how are the mere mortals supposed to know this ? > > I spent a lot of time at the dri site and didn't see this mentioned > anywhere. No idea. I don't remember

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-22 Thread Cameron Matheson
Hi, try removing libglide2 (i think that it actually was detrimental to me in the past--i'm not using a voodoo right now tho, so i can't check my settings). also, have you checked your XF86Config-4 to make sure that it hasn't been overriden? Cam On Wednesday 22 January 2003 03:32 pm, [EMAIL

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-22 Thread briand
name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: No *sigh* Linux soggy 2.4.20 #1 Wed Jan 22 20:04:49 PST 2003 i686 unknown Any other ideas ? Brian > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:32:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Col

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-22 Thread briand
Ok - I'll give it a try. Thanks for the info. Incidentally how are the mere mortals supposed to know this ? I spent a lot of time at the dri site and didn't see this mentioned anywhere. Brian > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:32:57P

Re: I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-22 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:32:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got a voodoo3 using X DRI which _was_ working just fine > until I "upgraded" to testing. > > Now it's broke. > > Everything I know to check is OK, but when I do glxinfo, dri is NOT > active. > > ~ $ glxinfo > name

I think testing busted my dri set-up

2003-01-22 Thread briand
I've got a voodoo3 using X DRI which _was_ working just fine until I "upgraded" to testing. Now it's broke. Everything I know to check is OK, but when I do glxinfo, dri is NOT active. ~ $ glxinfo name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: No