Re: iptables - I don't get it working

2003-10-16 Thread Joachim Fahnenmueller
Hi Joerg, I don't quite understand your script (I'm not an expert though). Something that worked very well for me can be found at http://www.seligma.com/linux-user/firewalls/ . For further information, see also http://www.netfilter.org/unreliable-guides/ . On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:30:12PM +

iptables - I don't get it working

2003-10-14 Thread Joerg Johannes
Hi everybody I have configured my kernel with iptables enabled: # IP: Netfilter Configuration # CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK is not set # CONFIG_IP_NF_QUEUE is not set CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=y CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_PKTTYPE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_MARK=m CON

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-12 Thread will trillich
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:23:22AM +0600, V.Suresh wrote: > Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable > version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the > testing version? And what is sid? I am a bit confused about these names. > Is Sid testin

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-11 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:55:41PM -0500, Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In Karsten M. Self's email, 10-05-2001: > > on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:32AM -0500, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL > > PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote: >

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-10 Thread Michael Janssen \(CS/MATH stud.\)
In Karsten M. Self's email, 10-05-2001: > on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:32AM -0500, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > > > > potato => stable > > > > woody =>

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-10 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:32AM -0500, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > > > potato => stable > > > woody => testing > > > sid=> unstable > > > > > > I beli

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-10 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > > potato => stable > > woody => testing > > sid=> unstable > > > > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable. > > When was a debian release ever "soon";) > kent In geolog

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-10 Thread matlads
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:26:28AM -0500, ktb wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:47:11AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > > > > potato => stable > > > >

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-10 Thread ktb
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:47:11AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > > > potato => stable > > > woody => testing > > > sid=> unstable > > > > > > I belie

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-10 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > > potato => stable > > woody => testing > > sid=> unstable > > > > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable. > > When was a debian release ever "soon"

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-09 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
:) But that's 'sposed to be secret! On Wednesday 09 May 2001 21:04, ktb wrote: > > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable. > > When was a debian release ever "soon";) > kent -- Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls/TELE: USA-707-442-6579\/A GNU-Debian linux user Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://www.

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-09 Thread ktb
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote: > potato => stable > woody => testing > sid=> unstable > > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable. When was a debian release ever "soon";) kent -- From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted First line o

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-09 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
potato = stable (current) woody = testing (will be the next stable) sid = unstable (bleeding edge stuff) tatah On Wednesday 09 May 2001 20:23, V.Suresh wrote: > Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable > version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then wha

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-09 Thread ktb
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:23:22AM +0600, V.Suresh wrote: > Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable > version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the > testing version? And what is sid? I am a bit confused about these names. > Is Sid testin

Re: I don't get it.

2001-05-09 Thread Craig Holyoak
potato => stable woody => testing sid=> unstable I believe woody will soon(?) become stable. Craig On Thu, 10 May 2001, V.Suresh wrote: > Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable > version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the > tes

I don't get it.

2001-05-09 Thread V.Suresh
Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the testing version? And what is sid? I am a bit confused about these names. Is Sid testing/unstable? or is Woody testing/unstable? The only thing I know