I installed microcom and like it as it is very similar to
the functionality I had with ckermit.
I briefly thought of compiling from source but laziness
got the better of me and I am happy with microcom.
Expect is what I am using for scripting so I just took my
kermit scrip
On 2020-04-03 at 17:40, elvis wrote:
> On 3/4/20 11:04 pm, Martin McCormick wrote:
>
>> The only thing that I truly miss after upgrading to buster is that
>> the package known as ckermit has fallen beside the road.
>>
>> I had a hard-drive fail on one system so installed buster from
>> installat
On 3/4/20 11:04 pm, Martin McCormick wrote:
The only thing that I truly miss after upgrading to
buster is that the package known as ckermit has fallen beside the
road.
I had a hard-drive fail on one system so installed buster
from installation media and the ckermit package appa
I wrote:
> look at screen.
Martin McCormick wrote:
> I use screen all the time and maybe I am missing
> something but what you get with screen is a new shell in each
> window, very useful but nothing to do with RS-232 ports.
Read the man page section titled WINDOW TYPES.
--
John Hasler
jh
On Apr 03, 2020, Martin McCormick wrote:
> John Hasler writes:
> > look at screen.
>
> I use screen all the time and maybe I am missing
> something but what you get with screen is a new shell in each
> window, very useful but nothing to do with RS-232 ports.
Maybe something like Minicom t
Martin McCormick wrote:
> The only thing that I truly miss after upgrading to
> buster is that the package known as ckermit has fallen beside the
> road.
>
> I had a hard-drive fail on one system so installed buster
> from installation media and the ckermit package apparently isn't
> p
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:52:33AM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
[...]
> I appreciate the responses. It looks like gkermit is
> just the file transfer which is good that it still exists but I
> want the stuff that is gone such as scripting and the ability to
> type things that go out over
On Vi, 03 apr 20, 08:52:33, Martin McCormick wrote:
>
> I use screen all the time and maybe I am missing
> something but what you get with screen is a new shell in each
> window, very useful but nothing to do with RS-232 ports.
See section WINDOW TYPES in the manpage. Seems like it also sup
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:52:33AM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> John Hasler writes:
> > look at screen.
>
> I use screen all the time and maybe I am missing
> something but what you get with screen is a new shell in each
> window, very useful but nothing to do with RS-232
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:14:12AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > Look at gkermit. It's evidently a GPL rewrite of ckermit. Also take a
> > look at screen.
>
> Yeah, I did an "apt-cache search ckermit" too.
>
> The package description for gkermit says,
>
> The non-fre
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:14:12AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Look at gkermit. It's evidently a GPL rewrite of ckermit. Also take a
> look at screen.
Yeah, I did an "apt-cache search ckermit" too.
The package description for gkermit says,
The non-free package ckermit adds connection
estab
Look at gkermit. It's evidently a GPL rewrite of ckermit. Also take a
look at screen.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
The only thing that I truly miss after upgrading to
buster is that the package known as ckermit has fallen beside the
road.
I had a hard-drive fail on one system so installed buster
from installation media and the ckermit package apparently isn't
part of the distribution any more.
13 matches
Mail list logo
