Sven Groot put forth on 3/4/2011 12:42 AM:
> My question then is twofold. Firstly, why are all interrupts being handled
> by the first CPU?
You should read this:
http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/2008/downloads/pdf/Thursday/Mark_Wagner.pdf
> I checked the various /proc/irq/#/smp_affinity entri
ding the kernel will resolve this as well.
Thanks,
Sven
-Original Message-
From: Stan Hoeppner [mailto:s...@hardwarefreak.com]
Sent: vrijdag 4 maart 2011 16:10
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hyperthreading problem with IRQ handling and scheduling
Sven Groot put forth on 3/3/2
Sven Groot put forth on 3/3/2011 11:28 PM:
Hello Sven,
> I am using a cluster of machines running Debian 5.0.4, kernel
> 2.6.26-2-amd64. These machines have dual Intel Xeon E5530 2.4GHz CPUs, which
> are quad-core CPUs with hyperthreading. So that means each machine has 8
> physical CPUs and a to
Hello all,
I am using a cluster of machines running Debian 5.0.4, kernel
2.6.26-2-amd64. These machines have dual Intel Xeon E5530 2.4GHz CPUs, which
are quad-core CPUs with hyperthreading. So that means each machine has 8
physical CPUs and a total of 16 logical CPUs.
I have run into an app
Hello all,
I am using a cluster of machines running Debian 5.0.4, kernel
2.6.26-2-amd64. These machines have dual Intel Xeon E5530 2.4GHz CPUs, which
are quad-core CPUs with hyperthreading. So that means each machine has 8
physical CPUs and a total of 16 logical CPUs.
I have run into an app
5 matches
Mail list logo