Hello,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:31:36PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2022 06:48:10 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> > Otherwise I'm afraid your claims about IPv6 so far have been quite
> > bizarre, on the level of "IPv6 ate my homework" or "my father was
> > killed by a 128
On 7/12/22 10:21, Lee wrote:
On 7/11/22, rhkramer wrote:
From the peanut gallery: I disabled IPv6 quite some time ago. I don't
recall how I did it, but I might have that information in my notes, somewhere.
The reason that I disabled it (which might not be totally logical) is that
in IPv4, I
On 7/11/22, rhkramer wrote:
>
> From the peanut gallery: I disabled IPv6 quite some time ago. I don't
> recall how I did it, but I might have that information in my notes, somewhere.
>
> The reason that I disabled it (which might not be totally logical) is that
> in IPv4, I have always had my com
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> I could not find (in the searching I did) equivalent functionality for IPv6,
> so
> I disabled IPv6 in hopes of keeping my systems (fairly) secure.
The equivalent to NAT in IPv6 is NAT, of course. It's not usually spoken
of much but for example my VPN provider does
On Sunday, July 10, 2022 06:48:10 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Otherwise I'm afraid your claims about IPv6 so far have been quite
> bizarre, on the level of "IPv6 ate my homework" or "my father was
> killed by a 128-bit integer", and can't be taken seriously.
From the peanut gallery: I disabled IP
Hi Charles,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 06:51:22PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> it is up to you to housebreak your applications to use IPv4 first.
If you find yourself having to do this, something is probably
broken. Broken things do exist, but it is really quite rare. What
you've written here make
Hi Gene,
Before we go any further let's just remember that this thread was
started by someone wanting to disable IPv6 for no specific reason.
They had decided they needed to do so to fix some problem they were
having, when in fact they had ALREADY disabled IPv6, so there is no
possibility whatsoev
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote:
And every single piece of this discussion is irrelevant to the OP's
issue, which is that their MTA is apparently not listening on 127.0.0.1;25.
IPv6 is a red herring.
Yes, this is my fault for choosing an inappropriate Subject line. I will try
again
Jul 10, 2022, 05:43 by charlescur...@charlescurley.com:
> My /etc/default/named looks like:
>
> #
> # run resolvconf?
> RESOLVCONF=no
>
> # startup options for the server
> OPTIONS="-4 -u bind"
>
>
> That should do it.
>
> But all that does is tell named to use IPv4. It will still return IPv6
> ad
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
local10 wrote:
Jul 10, 2022, 00:51 by charlescur...@charlescurley.com:
I do it in part by
using my own resolver, BIND9, and having it return only IPv4
addresses.
How did you do it? I tried to start named
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
local10 wrote:
> Jul 10, 2022, 00:51 by charlescur...@charlescurley.com:
>
> > I do it in part by
> > using my own resolver, BIND9, and having it return only IPv4
> > addresses.
>
> How did you do it? I tried to start named with "-4" option to use
> o
Jul 10, 2022, 00:51 by charlescur...@charlescurley.com:
> I do it in part by
> using my own resolver, BIND9, and having it return only IPv4 addresses.
>
How did you do it? I tried to start named with "-4" option to use only ipv4 but
it refused to start with that option, IIRC.
Regards,
On 7/9/22 21:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 06:51:22PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:59:48 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
Andy, you obviously don't live in ipv4 only territory. Until n-m or
whatever gets trained to auto switch to ipv4 if 6 fails, then we have
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 06:51:22PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:59:48 -0400
> gene heskett wrote:
>
> > Andy, you obviously don't live in ipv4 only territory. Until n-m or
> > whatever gets trained to auto switch to ipv4 if 6 fails, then we have
> > no choice but to disab
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:59:48 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> Andy, you obviously don't live in ipv4 only territory. Until n-m or
> whatever gets trained to auto switch to ipv4 if 6 fails, then we have
> no choice but to disable it if we want network connectivity of any
> kind outside of our own home
On 7/9/22 11:31, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
When I try to start fetchmail I get the error message
Jul 09 10:22:57 titan fetchmail[7286]:
reading message
mail...@rogerprice.org@mail.gandi.net:1 of 7
Am 09.07.22 um 16:14 schrieb Andy Smith:
> Sounds like you have a misconfiguration that should be fixed, rather
> than disabling IPv6 to work around it.
>
I do not know about this case, but there are still situations where
applications have problems with IPv6. For example the proprietary Citr
Am 09.07.22 um 15:52 schrieb Roger Price:
> because directory /proc/sys/net/ipv6 doesn't exist. What is the new way of
> disabling IPv6?
I did it recently just in the way you described on Debian 11.
--
http://www.cb-fraggle.de
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> When I try to start fetchmail I get the error message
>
> Jul 09 10:22:57 titan fetchmail[7286]:
> reading message
> mail...@rogerprice.org@mail.gandi.net:1 of 7 (8954 octets)
>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> Jul 09 10:22:57 titan fetchmail[7286]:
> Connection errors for this poll:
> name 0: connection to localhost:smtp [127.0.0.1/25] failed:
> Connection refused.
> name 1:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Andy Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to persuade
fetchmail to talk to exim4.
Sounds like you have a misconfiguration that should be fixed, rather
than disabling IPv6 to work around it.
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to persuade
> fetchmail to talk to exim4.
Sounds like you have a misconfiguration that should be fixed, rather
than disabling IPv6 to work around it.
> net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_
On 7/9/22 15:52, Roger Price wrote:
In a Debian 11 system, I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to
persuade fetchmail to talk to exim4. The advice generally given is to
add a line to /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
and run sysctl -p as root. With Debian 11 th
In a Debian 11 system, I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to
persuade fetchmail to talk to exim4. The advice generally given is to add a
line to /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
and run sysctl -p as root. With Debian 11 this generates the error message
sysct
I raised this question in the debian-ipv6 list. Here is the thread:-
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ipv6/2007/12/msg1.html Got one
solution of installing my own bind9 named which works.
On Dec 15, 2007 7:38 PM, Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amogh Hooshdar wrote the following on 15.12.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:40:01PM +0530, Amogh Hooshdar wrote:
> Thank you for response. But it did not help. I commented out all the
> ip6 lines in /etc/hosts and then even rebooted the box.
>
> Now see a sample output for aptitude update:-
>
> # aptitude update
> 0% [Connecting to ftp.us.debia
On Saturday 15 December 2007 05:10:01 Amogh Hooshdar wrote:
> I observed it with wireshark and the DNS queries and responses are like
> this:-
>
> DNS Standard query ftp.us.debian.org
> DNS Standard query response [Malformed packet]
> DNS Standrd query A ftp.us.debian.org
> DNS Standard query
Amogh Hooshdar wrote the following on 15.12.2007 14:10
> Thank you for response. But it did not help. I commented out all the
> ip6 lines in /etc/hosts and then even rebooted the box.
>
> Now see a sample output for aptitude update:-
>
> # aptitude update
> 0% [Connecting to ftp.us.debian.org (1.
Thank you for response. But it did not help. I commented out all the
ip6 lines in /etc/hosts and then even rebooted the box.
Now see a sample output for aptitude update:-
# aptitude update
0% [Connecting to ftp.us.debian.org (1.0.0.0)] [Connecting to security.debian.or
I observed it with wiresha
Amogh Hooshdar wrote the following on 15.12.2007 07:58
> I changed the "alias net-pf-10 ipv6" line to the following two lines.
>
> alias net-pf-10 off
> alias ipv6 off
>
> After rebooting, I checked: lsmod | grep ipv6. Sure enough it is gone
> and the command gives nil output. But when I use b
I am using Debian Lenny.
$ uname -a
Linux mylappy 2.6.18-4-486 #1 Wed May 9 22:23:40 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
I changed the "alias net-pf-10 ipv6" line to the following two lines.
alias net-pf-10 off
alias ipv6 off
After rebooting, I checked: lsmod | grep ipv6. Sure enough it is gone
and the com
On Sunday 26 August 2007 15:34, Alber wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Have the same problem on Debian Etch.
>
> What have been done:
> in /etc/modprobe.d/aliases
> alias net-pf-10 ipv6 changed to
> alias net-pf-10 off
> alias ipv6 off (problem exist)
>
> on next stage:
> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
> blacklist ipv6
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Alber wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Have the same problem on Debian Etch.
>
> What have been done:
> in /etc/modprobe.d/aliases
> alias net-pf-10 ipv6 changed to
> alias net-pf-10 off
> alias ipv6 off (problem exist)
this should have done it
>
> on next stage:
> /etc
Hi!
Have the same problem on Debian Etch.
What have been done:
in /etc/modprobe.d/aliases
alias net-pf-10 ipv6 changed to
alias net-pf-10 off
alias ipv6 off (problem exist)
on next stage:
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
blacklist ipv6 (problem exist)
on next stage:
adding alias net-pf-10 off
alias
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:05:07PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>
>> delay. Setting 'VERBOSE=yes' in /etc/default/rcS didn't help, it just
>> says
>>
>> Setting up networking.
>> Configuring network interfaces.
>>
>> And at this point there is a delay, and then
>>
>> St
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:05:07PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> delay. Setting 'VERBOSE=yes' in /etc/default/rcS didn't help, it just
> says
>
> Setting up networking.
> Configuring network interfaces.
>
> And at this point there is a delay, and then
>
> Starting portmap daemon.
>
> Any
Alex Samad wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
>> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
>> seconds. I don't need ipv6. How can it be disabled?
>>
>
> in /etc
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 21:15 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> >> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
> >> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:43:25AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> > I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
> > activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
> > seconds. I don't need
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
> seconds. I don't need ipv6. How can it be disabled?
>
in /etc/modprobe.d/aliases look fo
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:15:46PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> >> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
> >> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and i
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
>> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
>> seconds. I don't need ipv6. How can it be disabled?
>
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
> seconds. I don't need ipv6. How can it be disabled?
I think you can blacklist the ipv6 mo
I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
seconds. I don't need ipv6. How can it be disabled?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, Robert S wrote:
> I have posted a question recently about sendmail not resolving host names.
> It looks to me as if it is failing to do lookups.
That'd be a DNS failure - not sendmail... Some resolvers are b0rked
wrt /A6 lookups :(
> Is is possible to prevent sendm
I have posted a question recently about sendmail not resolving host names.
It looks to me as if it is failing to do lookups.
Is is possible to prevent sendmail from trying to do lookups? This
might solve the problem.
I'm not very keen on recompiling sendmail - I'd like to keep the orig
[Toshiro]
> Anybody know how to disable ipv6? I'm using sid with kernel 2.6.0-2.
With kernel 2.4, it's just a matter of editing /etc/modutils/aliases
and adding or changing the line for 'net-pf-10':
alias net-pf-10 off
and then of course run 'update-modules'.
Anybody know how to disable ipv6? I'm using sid with kernel 2.6.0-2.
Regards,
Toshiro.
ADSL-Para estar las 24 horas en internet
http://www.internet.com.uy Tel. 707.42.52
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
48 matches
Mail list logo
