-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:05:57PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> I just did an "apt-get install koffice", and although there is a package
> named that, there appears to be no such app as "koffice". So just
> guessing, I ran "korganizer", which brought up
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:20:53PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Because I've been looking for a calendaring solution for 4 or 5 years,
and have never found anything like the way we do things on campus. We
used Sc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:20:53PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> Because I've been looking for a calendaring solution for 4 or 5 years,
> and have never found anything like the way we do things on campus. We
> used Schedule+ on Wind
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:10AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
But does this allow you to share calendars with the secretary, and with
Joe Bob across the hall, without importing/exporting everytime you want
to share?
Again, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:10AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> But does this allow you to share calendars with the secretary, and with
> Joe Bob across the hall, without importing/exporting everytime you want
> to share?
Again, it uses the same format
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:16, Kent West wrote:
> BruceG wrote:
>
> >For someone that uses a calendar and
> >contact list with their e-mail, Ximian Evolution is good (I like that one a
> >lot). I don't have direct experience with MS Echange, so wouldn't be able to
> >make a fair comparison.
> >
>
BruceG wrote:
For someone that uses a calendar and
contact list with their e-mail, Ximian Evolution is good (I like that one a
lot). I don't have direct experience with MS Echange, so wouldn't be able to
make a fair comparison.
But does this allow you to share calendars with the secretary, and
> Last I used Evolution, it had the "slow-as-molasses" loading feature
> that Outlook has, but it lacked the "hang at least once a day" feature
> of which I'm so fond in Outlook, so it still has a way to go.
>
> --
> monique
I LOVE that slow as molasses feature! I'm a S-L-O-W reader.
Anyway, I us
On 2004-02-16, John L. Fjellstad penned:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> Isn't koffice/kmail/knode more or less a drop-in replacement for MS
>> Office/Outlook at this point?
>
> I think it's the combination of mail and calendering (basically the
> groupware functionality) that makes Outlook so good for
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Isn't koffice/kmail/knode more or less a drop-in replacement for MS
> Office/Outlook at this point?
I think it's the combination of mail and calendering (basically the
groupware functionality) that makes Outlook so good for business. From
what I understand, the upcoming kon
On 2/16/04 5:45 PM, "Steven Leach" wrote:
;) Good Man!!
> Oh, I'm not bashing Apple, Mac, or Mac OS X by any means. You might
> want to check out my email address and the web address on my signature
> :-)
>
> I have been interested in the PowerPC processor [32 general purpose
> registers!!!] s
Oh, I'm not bashing Apple, Mac, or Mac OS X by any means. You might
want to check out my email address and the web address on my signature
:-)
I have been interested in the PowerPC processor [32 general purpose
registers!!!] since the first rummers and articles many years ago
(what was that
On 2/16/04 1:07 PM, "s. keeling" wrote:
> (or Mac too of course).
Watch it now !! :)
--
Thanks!!
David Thurman
List Only at Web Presence Group Net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 12:02:11PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Based on past performance, I'm surprised they exist now. I was just
> trying to be diplomatic. Even the worst tyrant deserves a last meal
> and parting words before he's hung up on a meat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:20:42AM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why do you prefer KOffice over OpenOffice.org?
It's quite a bit faster than OO.o. I don't currently have KOffice
installed, one thing KOffice is lacking is output formats.
Incoming from Steven Leach:
> I would have to wonder what possible benefit would be derived from this.
>
> True, MS Word/Office is one of the biggest things which keeps desktop
> users dependent on Windows (or Mac too of course). But running
> Office, already a program with less than stellar s
Incoming from Paul Johnson:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:15:42PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > That's even weirder. Linux takes corporate computing by storm. How?
> > By abandoning the low end server market to Mickeysoft and going for
..^
> > the desktop mar
I would have to wonder what possible benefit would be derived from this.
True, MS Word/Office is one of the biggest things which keeps desktop
users dependent on Windows (or Mac too of course). But running
Office, already a program with less than stellar stability in my
experience, under some
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 11:42:57PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:31:06PM -0500, Richard Hoskins wrote:
> > I think it is probably more than 10% if you include Outlook. Outlook
> > is a must-have for organizations that are already heavily invested in
> > Exchange servers.
On Monday 16 February 2004 02:42 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:31:06PM -0500, Richard Hoskins wrote:
> > I think it is probably more than 10% if you include Outlook. Outlook
> > is a must-have for organizations that are already heavily invested in
> > Exchange servers.
>
> I
On Sunday 15 February 2004 10:31 pm, Richard Hoskins wrote:
> Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Personally, I think the time and money would be better spent
> > improving OpenOffice.org so it bridges that last 10% gap between it
> > and MS Office.
> I think it is probably more than 10% if
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 11:40:24PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:45:56PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> > Personally, I think the time and money would be better spent improving
> > OpenOffice.org so it bridges that last 10% gap between it and MS Office.
>
> OpenOffice.org is
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 11:45:20PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:15:42PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > That's even weirder. Linux takes corporate computing by storm. How?
> > By abandoning the low end server market to Mickeysoft and going for
> > the desktop market instea
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:45:20 -0800,
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:15:42PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
>
> > Maybe Microsoft would do well to start porting its software over
> > now.
>
> I'm not sure that beast deserves to conti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:15:42PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> That's even weirder. Linux takes corporate computing by storm. How?
> By abandoning the low end server market to Mickeysoft and going for
> the desktop market instead.
IBM isn't abandonin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:31:06PM -0500, Richard Hoskins wrote:
> I think it is probably more than 10% if you include Outlook. Outlook
> is a must-have for organizations that are already heavily invested in
> Exchange servers.
Isn't koffice/kmail/kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:45:56PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> Personally, I think the time and money would be better spent improving
> OpenOffice.org so it bridges that last 10% gap between it and MS Office.
OpenOffice.org is Sun's pet project. Howev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 07:15:28PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> But provided by IBM, not MS, right? (At least, that's what I recall
> from the slashdot summary ... I confess to not reading the details.)
Kind of. It's still MS Office, from Micro
Incoming from Richard Hoskins:
>
> So we're looking at IBM pitching Linux desktops at organizations
> using Windows servers. Who would have thunk?
That's even weirder. Linux takes corporate computing by storm. How?
By abandoning the low end server market to Mickeysoft and going for
the desktop
Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I think the time and money would be better spent
> improving OpenOffice.org so it bridges that last 10% gap between it
> and MS Office.
I think it is probably more than 10% if you include Outlook. Outlook
is a must-have for organizations that a
On Sunday 15 February 2004 09:15 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On 2004-02-16, Christian Schnobrich penned:
> > [btw, for all that didn't follow the link: it says there's to be a
> > Microsoft Office for Linux]
>
> But provided by IBM, not MS, right? (At least, that's what I recall
> from the slas
On 2004-02-16, Christian Schnobrich penned:
> On Son, 2004-02-15 at 19:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> Yeah, no kidding. I've gone and posted that up on my
>> website...that's just bizarre.
>
> [btw, for all that didn't follow the link: it says there's to be a
> Microsoft Office for Linux]
But provi
On Son, 2004-02-15 at 19:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Yeah, no kidding. I've gone and posted that up on my website...that's
> just bizarre.
[btw, for all that didn't follow the link: it says there's to be a
Microsoft Office for Linux]
Hmmm. Reminds me of something I read years ago: if Linux gains
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:21:30AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> http://infoworld.com/article/04/02/13/HNlinuxoffice_1.html
>
> That's a wierd story.
Yeah, no kidding. I've gone and posted that up on my website...that's
just bizarre.
http://ursine.ca/
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:21:30AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> http://infoworld.com/article/04/02/13/HNlinuxoffice_1.html
>
> That's a wierd story.
Not from IBM's perspective.
Reminiscent of the OS/2 for Windows 2.1 product, which pulled me out
of Windows into alternatives.
Kenward
--
In a co
http://infoworld.com/article/04/02/13/HNlinuxoffice_1.html
That's a wierd story.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
36 matches
Mail list logo
