At 05:30 PM 04/01/2000 -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
It sounds like the samba on the CD has bad dependencies, or the
library versions changed between when that samba was built and when
the CD was made.
-- I re-did a dselect with another 2.1 CD, this time R4, and it fixed
everything!
Thanks
Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:11 PM 04/01/2000 -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> >Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Bob, thanks for the help.
> >- again!
> > > But, how does one probe into the details of:
> > >"subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit s
At 12:11 PM 04/01/2000 -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Bob, thanks for the help.
- again!
> But, how does one probe into the details of:
> "subprocess pre-removal script returned error
exit status"?
You can look at the prerm script with
`less
/var
Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bob, thanks for the help.
>
> I tried it, to little avail.
>
> (session below). I can't tell if
> 1) just better tool usage is needed,
> 2) my configuration is broken, and if so how to recover,
> 3) the tools are broken (less likely..)
>
> But, how d
Bob, thanks for the help.
I tried it, to little avail.
(session below). I can't tell if
1) just better tool usage is needed,
2) my configuration is broken, and if so how to recover,
3) the tools are broken (less likely..)
But, how does one probe into the details of:
"subprocess
pre-removal s
Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 02:19 PM 03/30/2000 -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> >Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I took a new CDrom (2.1) and did re-deselect, which did a lot of upgrades
> > > to various stuff.
> > >
> >...
> > > dependency problems - not r
At 02:19 PM 03/30/2000 -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> I took a new CDrom (2.1) and did re-deselect, which did a lot of
upgrades
> to various stuff.
>
...
> dependency problems - not removing
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> samba
> li
Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I took a new CDrom (2.1) and did re-deselect, which did a lot of upgrades
> to various stuff.
>
> The end result is that everything seems OK, except a remaining dependency
> problem, based on Samba, but it won't remove, and it depends on
> libpam-u
At 08:06 AM 03/30/2000 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
Gregory Guthrie wrote:
>>Have you tried running `apt-get -f install'? If so,
what happened?
>
>Updating package status cache...done
>Checking system integrity...dependency error
>Correcting dependencies...failed
>E: Internal error, S
At 06:36 PM 03/29/2000 -0500, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Gregory Guthrie wrote:
> I am running Debian 2.0, upgraded from ... (libc5), and trying to upgrade
> to 2.1.
>
> When I do an apt-get upgrade, it complains that:
> "Sorry, but the following packages are broken.."
>
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Gregory Guthrie wrote:
> I am running Debian 2.0, upgraded from ... (libc5), and trying to upgrade
> to 2.1.
>
> When I do an apt-get upgrade, it complains that:
> "Sorry, but the following packages are broken.."
>
> and halts. When I try to repair the problems using d
Gregory Guthrie wrote:
>
[using Eudora for Windows: please turn off HTML output]
>I am running Debian 2.0, upgraded from ... (libc5), and trying to upgrade
>to 2.1.
>
>When I do an apt-get upgrade, it complains that:
> "Sorry, but the following packages are broken.."
>
>and h
I am running Debian 2.0,
upgraded from ... (libc5), and trying to upgrade to 2.1.
When I do an apt-get upgrade, it complains that:
"Sorry, but the following packages are
broken.."
and halts. When I try to repair the problems using dselect, I cannot seem
to get out of a circle which won't let
13 matches
Mail list logo
