On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:05:22 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:58 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:35:04 -0400
> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:22 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> [snip for brevity]
> >
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:58 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:35:04 -0400
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:22 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
[snip for brevity]
> >
> > Personally, I'd use a cluster/distributed filesystem with back links or
> > refe
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:07:04 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:24:35AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the home
> > directories for all the employees client machines.
> >
> > Mo
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:24:35AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the home
> directories for all the employees client machines.
>
> Most of the employees mount their home dirs manually, but some are
> mounted using scripts. Employe
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:35:04 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:22 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:52:58 -0400
> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:22 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:52:58 -0400
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
> > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > About the u
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:52:58 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > About the union thing I first thought of somehow union mouting all the
> > >
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 21:17 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:52:58 -0400
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
> > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > About the u
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:52:58 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > About the union thing I first thought of somehow union mouting all the
> > >
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:49 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > Lookup sshfs (or shfs as it is commonly know) it is completely at the
> > whim of the user. They use an existing well known, well vetted daemon
> > (openssh-server) and in a local environment (meaning no sl
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > About the union thing I first thought of somehow union mouting all the
> > > different home directories on a single machine which then serves as
> > > the acces
Greg Folkert wrote:
> Lookup sshfs (or shfs as it is commonly know) it is completely at the
> whim of the user. They use an existing well known, well vetted daemon
> (openssh-server) and in a local environment (meaning no slow links) with
> 100Mbit/sec, I get nearly line speed transfer rates (100M
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I can say that sshfs is probably the singe best thing I've seen come
> along in a long time. Mainly because, if you already have established
> good SSH practices, there is really no additional server-side setup
> y
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:26:42 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 05:24 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the home
> > directories for all the employees client machines.
> >
> > Most of the empl
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 05:24 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the home
> directories for all the employees client machines.
>
> Most of the employees mount their home dirs manually, but some are
> mounted using scripts. Employee John
Hi.
At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the home
directories for all the employees client machines.
Most of the employees mount their home dirs manually, but some are mounted
using scripts. Employee John knows he belongs to NFS server 1, and emplyoee
Britney knows she
16 matches
Mail list logo