Re: Help debugging package problems (again)

2003-02-02 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:43:29 -0800 (PST), Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [back to list] > > On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Faheem Mitha wrote: > >> > ii libc6 2.3.1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and >Timezone data >> >> As I am sure hordes of people will shortly te

Re: Help debugging package problems (again)

2003-02-02 Thread Bill Moseley
[back to list] On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Faheem Mitha wrote: > > ii libc6 2.3.1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and >Timezone data > > As I am sure hordes of people will shortly tell you, you have upgraded > to the libc6 in unstable. In general, not such a great idea. Now

Help debugging package problems (again)

2003-02-01 Thread Bill Moseley
[I'm sending this again -- Debian is a package system and I think understanding this is importnat. I hope someone can help explain this.] >From Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:46:04 -0800 (PST) I'm running a mix of testing/unstable. $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf APT::Default-Release "testing"; APT::Cache-L

Help debugging package problems

2003-01-28 Thread Bill Moseley
I'm running a mix of testing/unstable. $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf APT::Default-Release "testing"; APT::Cache-Limit 1000; This is a desktop machine where I want to use new code: I have installed some packages with apt-get -t unstable install I wonder if that has not caused problems and if I