Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread Martin Bishop
Hi, Thank you all for answering my plea for help. Special thanks go to Oswald B. and David W.. I took your sagely advice and I've managed to retrieve all of my data. I was wrong in remembering that hda2 was a primary partition. It was a logical partition. Changing between primary and logical

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> Ok so far, I've only recreated a primary partition and that doesn't > seem to work. I guess I'll try setting it as a logical partition and > see if it restores things back to normal. > > A quick question. If the partition was originally a primary partition, > and now I'm setting as a logical par

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread David Wright
Quoting Martin Bishop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > So to answer your question, yes I did run 'dos fdisk' but I did not > modify/change anything when I quit. That's good. DOS invariably (I think) forces you to reboot if you make changes because its idea of how to label the partitions is so bizarre, so

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread David Wright
Quoting Martin Bishop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi David, > > Thanks for replying. > > David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't have the start of this thread anymore. You have linux on > > this machine? If so, I'd try and mount the partition readonly from > > linux rather than going anywher

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> > > There is also usually a backup of the dos fat 6*512 bytes into the > > > partition: > > this is a copy of the boot sector, not the fat. > > > > > Possibly this location could be different depending on the parameters > > > used when formatting, the size, the fat size (12, 16, 32). But there >

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread David Wright
Quoting Oswald Buddenhagen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > There is also usually a backup of the dos fat 6*512 bytes into the > > partition: > this is a copy of the boot sector, not the fat. > > > Possibly this location could be different depending on the parameters > > used when formatting, the size, th

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread kmself
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 10:48:31AM +1000, Martin Bishop wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for replying. > > David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't have the start of this thread anymore. You have linux on > > this machine? If so, I'd try and mount the partition readonly from > > linux rathe

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread Martin Bishop
Hi David, Thanks for replying. David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't have the start of this thread anymore. You have linux on > this machine? If so, I'd try and mount the partition readonly from > linux rather than going anywhere near it with other OSes. I don't > think linux looks at t

Re: Help -- Data recovery

2000-04-20 Thread Martin Bishop
Oswald Buddenhagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hmm ... how did you use dos fdisk at any time? if so, then you _might_ > have a problem. but i guess, you used only cfdisk for the whole > repartitioning. After booting into Win98 and couldn't see hda2, I ran 'dos fdisk' to check the partition to see