Re: Help! strange bttv problem

2003-11-20 Thread Albert Dengg
Hi well, I don't know about xconfig but config/menuconfig leave all options in the config file and just comment out the option that are not set...sot that you should at least see them# When I tried it quickly qith a 2.4.21 source that is lying around on my disc it also sets the CONFIG_VIDEO_BT

Re: Help! strange bttv problem

2003-11-20 Thread John Peter
Richard Kimber wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:18:57 +0100 Albert Dengg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi bttv works well for most things with 2.4.22 (at the moment im using bttv 9.11 (development version) from bytesex.org/bttv/ with 2.4.22 to test v4l2 support but otherwise it works well with the i

Re: Help! strange bttv problem

2003-11-19 Thread Richard Kimber
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:18:57 +0100 Albert Dengg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > bttv works well for most things with 2.4.22 > (at the moment im using bttv 9.11 (development version) from > bytesex.org/bttv/ with 2.4.22 to test v4l2 support but otherwise it > works well with the included versi

Re: Help! strange bttv problem

2003-11-19 Thread Albert Dengg
Hi bttv works well for most things with 2.4.22 (at the moment im using bttv 9.11 (development version) from bytesex.org/bttv/ with 2.4.22 to test v4l2 support but otherwise it works well with the included version for me ... # # Multimedia devices # CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV=m # # Video For Linux # CONFIG

Help! strange bttv problem

2003-11-19 Thread Richard Kimber
When I do make xconfig for the first time in a clean 2.4.22 tree I am presented with the option to have support for BT848 video for linux (having already said 'm' to the main Video for Linux and to I2C support). When I choose 'm' and save, an examination of .config shows there is no reference to i