r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! partition table!
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:34:37 +0200
Whoops...
That's a bad one. Really evil. So you wrote a new filesystem over
your last one?
A partition itself can be found again when it disappears from the
disklabel,
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 02:57:05PM +, Hugo Ideler wrote:
> Well, I'd love to give it a try, as I have nothing to lose.
> But, how do I get to your 'fsck' utility? I rebooted to my Woody CD1 just a
> few secs ago, went to shell, but got 'fsck: no such command'.
Use /sbin/fsck if /sbin isn't in
Golani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! partition table!
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:19:03 +0530
Hello,
Again this may be way too trivial, but I recently did a mkswap on my root
partition instead of the space set aside for swap. I no
Hello,
Again this may be way too trivial, but I recently did a mkswap on my root
partition instead of the space set aside for swap. I noticed the prob just as
you and switched off the machine and restarted with similar results as you.
To recover I rebooted from my Debian CD and did a fsck /dev
On Friday 07 March 2003 02:34 pm, Hugo Ideler wrote:
> It's ext3, but I must add that the formating of wasn't very far when I
> hit the power-off. But I suppose this won't make much of a difference?
>
> But isn't it possible to recover files in the style that it is possible
> to recover files delet
This mail is solely to keep anyone up to date that was following this
thread.
I tried to no success recover my data. I tried demos of expensive recovery
software - and some could find superblocks, but not recover my files. It
seems the message is quite clear - no FAT - no recovery. I've managed
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 23:34:43 +
"Hugo Ideler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's ext3, but I must add that the formating of wasn't very far when I
> hit the power-off. But I suppose this won't make much of a difference?
This probably won't work, but you could boot with a rescue CD (Knoppix
is k
rectory. :)
--Azaghal
From: Johan Ehnberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hugo Ideler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! partition table!
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:34:37 +0200
Whoops...
That's a bad one. Really evil. So you wrote a new filesystem over your last
Whoops...
That's a bad one. Really evil. So you wrote a new filesystem over your
last one?
A partition itself can be found again when it disappears from the
disklabel, but this is different.
AFAIK, the data (or probably 99% of it) is still there, on your
partition, but there's no filesystem to t
My disk layout:
hda1: Windows XP 10 GB
hda2: Debian 3.0 40 GB
I've been happily using debian 3.0 woody for 2 weeks now. I decided it was
time for an adventure and decided to install sarge unstable to my scsi
drive. I booted the cdrom, and had fdisk write the partition table to my
scsi drive. the
Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Arup Mukherjee wrote:
>
> >I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> > some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> > disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
> > wind
"Arup Mukherjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm under the impression (from the debian fdisk man page, among other
> things) that DOS/W95 store a copy of the partition table in their boot
> sectors, and use its info in preference to that from the MBR. Assuming
> that's true, I'd just like to
Hello!
Arup Mukherjee writes:
>
>
> Ralph Winslow writes:
> > Arup Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> > > some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> > > disks, as linux sees them, are screw
Ralph Winslow writes:
> Arup Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> > some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> > disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
> > windows 95
On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Arup Mukherjee wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
> windows 95 from the hard disks (vi
Hi,
I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
windows 95 from the hard disks (via lilo, which still works), both dos
and w95 still hav
16 matches
Mail list logo
