On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 08:30:23AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> Out of despration, I tried the lines below instead of the ones you gave me.
>
> Lines you had me use:
> auth required pam_unix_auth.so
> account required pam_unix_acct.so
> password required
Ben,
Out of despration, I tried the lines below instead of the ones you gave me.
Lines you had me use:
auth required pam_unix_auth.so
account required pam_unix_acct.so
password required pam_unix_passwd.so
session required pam_unix_session.so
Lines taken from the ot
In the dselect list I see
passwd19990827-7
shadowI do not see a package called shadow.
I am getting my debian from ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib
non-free
There is not a package called pam-apps on the list.
Do you think the segmentation faults I get with passwd, su,
On 23-Oct-99 Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I could not find pam-apps at all using dselect. While I was there, I
> removed all obsolete packages
> (there were several, and this did not have any other affects). dselect did
> want to install several
> other packages but this did not help e
Ben,
I could not find pam-apps at all using dselect. While I was there, I removed
all obsolete packages
(there were several, and this did not have any other affects). dselect did
want to install several
other packages but this did not help either.
I am not sure why my system ended up with sha
I can not log in and the passwd function still give me a segmentation fault. I
will remove
pam-apps.
Do I need to do anything else to get the changes I've made to be recognized?
Doug
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 11:44:27AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > Ok, I modified t
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 11:44:27AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ok, I modified the file as you show below.
>
> Did you notice that there was a file named other.dpkg-dist that had the
> following in it?
> Not sure if this is important or not.
> auth required pam_unix.so
> account
Ok, I modified the file as you show below.
Did you notice that there was a file named other.dpkg-dist that had the
following in it?
Not sure if this is important or not.
auth required pam_unix.so
account required pam_unix.so
password required pam_unix.so
session required
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 08:51:47AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ok Ben, here they are.
>
> One other thing to note: During the install I had a message with "modutils"
> stating
> that The form:
> Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10 was replaced with the form:
> Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10/fs
Thanks for the reply Eric,
I have attacked the output from /etc/dpkg -S pam
"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > Hello & Help!
> >
> > I have a potato system that was running fine until a few minutes ago...
> >
> > After the upgrad
Ok Ben, here they are.
One other thing to note: During the install I had a message with "modutils"
stating
that The form:
Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10 was replaced with the form:
Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10/fs
I could not find where to change thi. I did find a file called
conf.modules.old
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> What is going on? Please help me recover my system. I currently have a
> single login as root where I was running dselect. I am afraid to log
> off because I don't want to be locked out permanently.
Can you attach all of the
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Hello & Help!
>
> I have a potato system that was running fine until a few minutes ago...
>
> After the upgrade I have seen these problems: (It upgraded about 50M of
> packages).
>
> 1. I can not login to a virtual terminal.
Hello & Help!
I have a potato system that was running fine until a few minutes ago...
I used dselect to select a package and it wanted to upgrade a bunch on
stuff. I let it because I was interested to see how long it would take
with my new DSL connection.
After the upgrade I have seen these pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
