On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 at 4:40:05 PM UTC+5:30, Reco wrote:
> 1) Make preseed.cfg, pass it to the installer as specified at [1].
> 2) Add something like this into pressed.cfg:
> preseed/late_command="in-target apt-get install -y ntpsec"
> 3) Run the installer.
Great, thanks Reco, it worked l
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:21:30AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> It makes little sense to have two or more NTP clients installed on the
> same host. Thus installing one should uninstall others.
In jessie, stretch and buster, systemd-timesyncd was not a separate
package. The systemd-timesyncd program was p
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:08:31AM -0700, jaikuma...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 at 3:30:07 PM UTC+5:30, Reco wrote:
> > Debian-installer is forbidden to remove installed packages by default.
> > Hence the message:
> > Mar 22 07:35:57 in-target: E: Packages need to be removed but
On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 at 3:30:07 PM UTC+5:30, Reco wrote:
> Debian-installer is forbidden to remove installed packages by default.
> Hence the message:
> Mar 22 07:35:57 in-target: E: Packages need to be removed but remove is
> disabled.
Understood, then (if you know) what it is the way forw
change an appropriate
> > configuration file.
> Yes, that is what I mentioned - any of the implemention (ntp or ntpsec)
> giving me the same behaviour in headless installation, also i'm not
> triggering installation of 'systemd-timesyncd' at all, how come this is
> getting insta
or ntpsec) giving
me the same behaviour in headless installation, also i'm not triggering
installation of 'systemd-timesyncd' at all, how come this is getting installed
and giving error in the log? :)
> It makes little sense to have two or more NTP clients installed on the
>
Hi.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 01:42:28PM +0530, Jaikumar Sharma wrote:
> It seems at first sight that systemd-timesyncd is default date/time
> synchronization tool but it may act as full fledged NTP server?
No. It can act as an NTP client only.
> How to handle 'ntp' o
'ntp' or 'ntpsec' headless installation? and what are the
reasons for this behaviour?
Thank you.
Regards,
Jaikumar
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:31, Adi Linden wrote:
> > You -could- (I stress could here) use 'fai', but I suspect that you'd
> > consider that overkill on you part. Indeed, I'd agree. What you'd
really
> > want to do is use 'deboostrap' on the headless server. There's plenty
of
> > documentation
> You -could- (I stress could here) use 'fai', but I suspect that you'd
> consider that overkill on you part. Indeed, I'd agree. What you'd really
> want to do is use 'deboostrap' on the headless server. There's plenty of
> documentation on how to do this.
To use 'deboostrap' I already need a work
--- Adi Linden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A 'kickstart' like install where a single CD installs a base system
> with all parameters such as partitioning, network, etc pre-defined.
You -could- (I stress could here) use 'fai', but I suspect that you'd
consider that overkill on you part. Inde
Is it possible to install a Debian system headless (no keyboard or monitor
attached at any time)? A couple of possibilities come to mind.
A 'kickstart' like install where a single CD installs a base system
with all parameters such as partitioning, network, etc pre-defined.
A boot image wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
