Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-04 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:56:31PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:41:01 -0700 > Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What probably happened is they hit Reply-All and sent it as the > > unsubscribe. So a message came here and one came to you directly from > >

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-04 Thread Richard Kimber
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 02:10:26 +0200 Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you using standard mbox format? Could it be that it's just the end > of another email that just happened to have a proper "From " header in > its *body* ? It's all MH and Sylpheed. - Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote: > > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the > > headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the > > message went into the wrong box.

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Carel Fellinger
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote: > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the > headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the > message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the > list is administ

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Robert Ian Smit
* Jens Grivolla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-10-2002 00:02]: > If you reply could you confirm that this message is visible on the > mailing list? It is. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Jens Grivolla
Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would advise filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header, not To: or Cc:, > > if the latter is what you're doing. This should be reliable. > > Thanks, but there wasn't such a header in the message. No referen

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Richard Kimber
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:36:02 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It had the above To UNSUBSCRIBE stuff at the bottom. I assumed that > > meant that it did. > > > > - Richard. > > > > What did the "From: " header say? From: Dale Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Richard. -- To UNSUBS

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Andy Saxena
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:11:24PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote: > > It had the above To UNSUBSCRIBE stuff at the bottom. I assumed that meant > that it did. > > - Richard. > What did the "From: " header say? -Andy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Richard Kimber
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:41:01 -0700 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What probably happened is they hit Reply-All and sent it as the > unsubscribe. So a message came here and one came to you directly from > some other message you sent. > > If it did not have a list header it did n

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:54, Richard Kimber wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:17:57 +0100 > > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would advise filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header, not To: or Cc:, > > if the latter is what you're doing. This should be reliable. > > Thanks, but ther

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Richard Kimber
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:36:36 +0200 Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-10-2002 15:07]: > > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the > > headers to debian. > > How do you know that the message came from this list then?

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Richard Kimber
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:17:57 +0100 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would advise filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header, not To: or Cc:, > if the latter is what you're doing. This should be reliable. Thanks, but there wasn't such a header in the message. No reference to the list at a

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Richard Kimber said: > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the > headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the > message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the > list is administered? > > - R

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Robert Ian Smit
* Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-10-2002 15:07]: > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the > headers to debian. How do you know that the message came from this list then? Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote: > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the > headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the > message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the > list is administ

Headers in this ML

2002-10-03 Thread Richard Kimber
I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the list is administered? - Richard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with