Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:19, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do > > not want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am > > looking for. While edi

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/25/07 11:41, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > On Thursday 25 January 2007 01:12, Marc Shapiro wrote: >> Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > said: >>> Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

O. raju Nvu has not had any significant upgrades since 1.0 and the version that was in Debian didn't have many bug-fixes either (my packages says version 1.0final-1). A new HTML editor using Gecko 1.9 is being worked on (Nvu uses 1.7 I think), but it is not even in beta yet and it looks like

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Thursday 25 January 2007 01:12, Marc Shapiro wrote: > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > said: > > Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly > > as it would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG > > way o

Απ: shopping for an HTML editor

2007/1/25, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:04, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex [...] Try Amaya. I

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:04, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS > capabilities are necessary. > > I used to use nvu. But looks l

Re: Re: shopping for an HTML editor

Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > said: Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly as it would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG way of editing html pages. HTML editing should be as easy as writing a

Re: texmacs (Re: shopping for an HTML editor)

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:24:04PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > I used to think vim + latex-suite is the ideal way to edit a complex LaTeX > document. But then I tried texmacs and just love it. Now, all my documents > are in .tm format instead of .tex. If you are a heavy LaTeX user, I s

texmacs (Re: shopping for an HTML editor)

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 21:39, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Personally, opening up an HTML document in vi and hacking away at it is > much easier than using a WYSIWYG editor. But then, I think that writing > a LaTeX document in vi is much easier than editing a document in word or > abiword

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:39:49PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly as it > would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG way of editing > html pages. > > HTML editing should be as easy as writing a texmac

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

am > > looking for. While editing the page, it should look exactly as it would > > appear on the net. > > I think that your approach is misguided. The closest to WYSIWYG you > will get is that the HTML editor/composer you are using will show you > what pages will look l

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:03, Glenn Becker wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic > > HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no > > complex CSS capabilities are necessary. > > Bluefish or Quanta are

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex > CSS capabilities are necessary. Amaya sounds like it's what you're looking for. It produc

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 15:22 -0500, celejar wrote: > On 1/24/07, Glenn Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > > > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no comp

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

as it would appear on the > net. > I think that your approach is misguided. The closest to WYSIWYG you will get is that the HTML editor/composer you are using will show you what pages will look like in browsers that use the exact same rendering engine as the compose tool. Think about this for

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

Bluefish does WYSIWYG ? I thought it is "merely" an HTML editor. you are correct, my inner filter made me leap right over WYSIWYG. sorry. gb +-+ Glenn Becker - [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lo

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On 1/24/07, Glenn Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS > capabilities are necessary. Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors,

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not > want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am looking > for. While editing the page, it should look exactly as it would appear on the

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS > capabilities are necessary. > > I used to use nvu. But lo

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS capabilities are necessary. Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors, or there's html-helper-mode in Emacs. If you like real basic, there&

shopping for an HTML editor

Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS capabilities are necessary. I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not want to edit any text files. So vim

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

I love vim too, so whatever you decide to use it is ok, I think vim is a very powerful tool, and I love that editor, what I know is that which ever of both are a good option to edit ;). Regards. On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:55:30 -0400, Silvan wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 01:04 pm, Joris Hui

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Tuesday 31 August 2004 01:04 pm, Joris Huizer wrote: > > I think that the best editor that you can use is emacs, > > you can edit whatever you want there even assembler. > > > > I recomend that one, besides you can run commands > > whithin it. > Well, you can do all that in vim too ;) Don't ca

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Wednesday 01 September 2004 17:05, cr wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:29, Robert Parker wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 18:08, cr wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking for an editor

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:29, Robert Parker wrote: > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 18:08, cr wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking for an editor that > > > would allow me to have a quick (re)start. Any re

[Fwd: Re: HTML editor. What to use?]

--- Begin Message --- Slightly off-topic, but I thought everyone might find this useful as I learned it only a few days ago. I always admired emacs for it's ability to run a shell within a frame of the program. It's very useful for programming, is wonderful for web development as well since you

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

Sergio Basurto wrote: I think that the best editor that you can use is emacs, you can edit whatever you want there even assembler. Ummm... Any text editor can edit assember language, Midnight Commander has nice editor, MC also shows html-crap properly formatted, so you can type your text and then s

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

Sorry if the statement hurt in any way, I agree with you its a matter of taste and I think my statement was bad formed, I mean at least for me is the best and obviously there are a lot goo editors out there. Well for my experience emacs is a good one. Regards. On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:04:02 +0200,

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

I think that the best editor that you can use is emacs, you can edit whatever you want there even assembler. I recomend that one, besides you can run commands whithin it. Regards. Well, you can do all that in vim too ;) Don't call emacs or vim the best, it's a matter of taste! :p (sorry I had to

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:08:42 +1200, cr wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking > for an editor that > > would allow me to have a quick (re)start. Any > recomendations? > > > > Running Sarge here. > > > >

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Tuesday 31 August 2004 18:08, cr wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking for an editor that > > would allow me to have a quick (re)start. Any recomendations? > > > > Running Sarge here. > > > > thank you

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

> 'Quanta' is pretty good and easy to use.Comes packaged with KDE in Debian > Woody, so hopefully is still there in Sarge. Personally I also like quanta, its got good syntax highlighting. As for a WSIWYG editor you would be best to run dreamwaver, I know it requires wine, but for just click a

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking for an editor that > would allow me to have a quick (re)start. Any recomendations? > > Running Sarge here. > > thank you for your attention ;-) > > peace. 'Quanta' is pretty good an

Re: HTML editor. What to use?

On Monday 30 August 2004 07:31 am, Francisco Borges wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking for an editor that > would allow me to have a quick (re)start. Any recomendations? > > Running Sarge here. > > thank you for your attention ;-) A couple I didn't see mention

Re: Installing nvu:"the html editor for L--dows"

Russ Pitman wrote: ... I found it a PITA to install and get running. YMMV. I just ran the executable (after untar-ing the downloaded file) and it was working (well, I didn't test all the fucntionality, I created a very simple web page and published it using file:// protocol) this is on debia

Re: Installing nvu:"the html editor for L--dows"

David Baron wrote: > If you already have Debian up and running, you do not need Lindows. Agreed > Nvu is a Mozilla operation. If you have a recent Mozilla, it should play. I I use the latest version from mozilla.org > have not installed Nvu as of yet but downloaded it for both Linux and > W--

Installing nvu:"the html editor for L--dows"

If you already have Debian up and running, you do not need Lindows. Nvu is a Mozilla operation. If you have a recent Mozilla, it should play. I have not installed Nvu as of yet but downloaded it for both Linux and W--dows. I had previous played with Komodo which is a GUI-IDE for perl, python, PH

Re: Installing nvu:"the html editor for L--dows"

Dan Hunt wrote: I'm eager to try out nvu, without finding a spare box / partition to install lindows upon. Yes they are giving l--dows away again. http://nvu.com/download.html How would I ensure that my debian unstable system would have the right packages required? Do I install this nvu-0.1.tar.gz

Installing nvu:"the html editor for L--dows"

I'm eager to try out nvu, without finding a spare box / partition to install lindows upon. Yes they are giving l--dows away again. http://nvu.com/download.html How would I ensure that my debian unstable system would have the right packages required? Do I install this nvu-0.1.tar.gz by moving it f

Re: wysiwyg html editor

"Paul" == Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:38:02AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad Paul> wrote: >> Incidentally, if you use XEmacs you get an HTML mode based on >> the PSGML mode by default. This comes with all the DTDs for >> HTML, and the e

Re: wysiwyg html editor

> Incidentally, if you use XEmacs you get an HTML mode based on the > PSGML mode by default. This comes with all the DTDs for HTML, and > the editing mode is fully validating. You can use mouse clicks to > figure out what elements are allowed at any point, have emacs > normalize your HTML code, fi

Re: wysiwyg html editor

On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:38:02AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > Incidentally, if you use XEmacs you get an HTML mode based on the > PSGML mode by default. This comes with all the DTDs for HTML, and the > editing mode is fully validating. You can use mouse clicks to figure Dude, that's pretty ba

Re: WYSIWYG Html editor recomendation...

Thomas Halahan wrote: > > I have tried 'amaya' which is open surce from the w3 > organisation. its' well featured and also makes very nice > looking HTML at the back end. However there is not ability > to refresh if you change outside the editor (like in emacs) > which I find a bit annoying. I

Re: WYSIWYG Html editor recomendation...

I have tried 'amaya' which is open surce from the w3 organisation. its' well featured and also makes very nice looking HTML at the back end. However there is not ability to refresh if you change outside the editor (like in emacs) which I find a bit annoying. I have also used the mozilla co

Re: WYSIWYG Html editor recomendation...

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 03:38:39PM +, Alexander Wallace wrote: It's not really WYSIWYG but Quanta (qt) and Bluefish (gtk+) are worth a look. > Hello there! Can some one recomend me a good WYSIWYG editor that will > work with debian testing? I would like to find something that will let > me crea

Re: WYSIWYG Html editor recomendation...

On 23 Nov 2001, Alexander Wallace wrote: > Hello there! Can some one recomend me a good WYSIWYG editor that will > work with debian testing? I would like to find something that will let > me create tables and forms with all the possible html controls... amaya. When the right way is the only way.

Re: WYSIWYG Html editor recomendation...

I'm hardly an expert, but amaya seems to work pretty well. I'm using in testing. Cam * Alexander Wallace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hello there! Can some one recomend me a good WYSIWYG editor that will > work with debian testing? I would like to find something that will let > me create ta

WYSIWYG Html editor recomendation...

Hello there! Can some one recomend me a good WYSIWYG editor that will work with debian testing? I would like to find something that will let me create tables and forms with all the possible html controls... Thanks!

searching HTML editor

Hi! Is there any other cool gtk based IDE for HTML code like bluefish in potato 2.2r3? Timo

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

bian. True. -Original Message- From: Richard Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:32 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor > From: Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sorry for the ignorance but how does this

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

> From: Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sorry for the ignorance but how does this template system work ? >I can't imagine the benefits from this kind of approach. I thought you knew Dreamweaver. It's just copy and paste... you build a basic form for the page. When you want a new page

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

T] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor > From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Steve wrote: >> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as >> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most >> pros use a

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

> From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Steve wrote: >> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as >> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most >> pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is >> WYSIWY

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, ktb wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:24:16AM -0500, Steve wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > > > > > if dreamweaver would be available on Linux i'm sure there would be a LOT > > > of > > > designer's making the transition, though i must add that Dream

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:24:16AM -0500, Steve wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > > > if dreamweaver would be available on Linux i'm sure there would be a LOT of > > designer's making the transition, though i must add that Dreamweaver (not > > UDev version) has it's flaws and

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

is, too bad -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 4:24 PM To: Joris Lambrecht Cc: Richard Taylor; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > if dreamweave

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > if dreamweaver would be available on Linux i'm sure there would be a LOT of > designer's making the transition, though i must add that Dreamweaver (not > UDev version) has it's flaws and shortcomings it is still a very productive > program to work with

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

Steve wrote: > > > It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as > good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most > pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is > WYSIWYG and almost no one writes their own postscript

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

--- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:51 PM To: Richard Taylor Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Mon, 1

[OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > > >> >Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of course -yet > >> >anyways. > >> > >> That depends on whether you hand write your code or let a > >

Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor was Re: Rebooting is foolish ....

> From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > >> >Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of course -yet >> >anyways. >> >> That depends on whether you hand write your code or let a >> wysiwyg editor approximate it for you. >> >> Most pros will

Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor was Re: Rebooting is foolish ....

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > >Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of course -yet > >anyways. > > That depends on whether you hand write your code or let a > wysiwyg editor approximate it for you. > > Most pros will tell you that the only proper code is hand

WYSIWYG HTML Editor was Re: Rebooting is foolish ....

> From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, William Leese wrote: >> mmm, i'll give it a try. Just hope someone will come along with a good >> WYSIWYS-editor for linux (GPL-ed.. ofcourse, unlike Bluefish) some time. > >Give Amaya a tryout, done by the w3 folks. Amaya's really good...

WYSIWYG HTML Editor was Re: Rebooting is foolish ....

On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, William Leese wrote: > mmm, i'll give it a try. Just hope someone will come along with a good > WYSIWYS-editor for linux (GPL-ed.. ofcourse, unlike Bluefish) some time. > Give Amaya a tryout, done by the w3 folks. Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of

Re: HTML editor

> Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > understands PHP? My favorite editor is HomeSite, and I have yet to find > anything comparable for Linux. I've tried running HomeSite with WINE, but > haven't gotten that to work :( thanks

Re: HTML editor

t; Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > > > understands PHP? > > > > > > Michael > > > > Perhaps bluefish http://bluefish.openoffice.nl > > actually i'd suggest vim and/or HTML-kit/wine(<-- this one is tested).

Re: HTML editor

On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:09:33PM -0800, Michael Dickey wrote: > Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > understands PHP? My favorite editor is HomeSite, and I have yet to find > anything comparable for Linux. I've tried running HomeSite with WI

Re: HTML editor

> Michael Dickey wrote: > > Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > > understands PHP? > > > > Michael > > Perhaps bluefish http://bluefish.openoffice.nl actually i'd suggest vim and/or HTML-kit/wine(<-- this one is

Re: HTML editor

On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:09:33PM -0800, Michael Dickey wrote: > Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > understands PHP? My favorite editor is HomeSite, and I have yet to find > anything comparable for Linux. I've tried running HomeSite with WI

Re: HTML editor

Michael Dickey wrote: > Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > understands PHP? > > Michael Perhaps bluefish http://bluefish.openoffice.nl -- Powered by TUX from Herbert Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 913 159 74

Re: HTML editor

on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:09:33PM -0800, Michael Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & > understands PHP? My favorite editor is HomeSite, and I have yet to find > anything comparable for Linux. I've tried run

HTML editor

Any suggestions for a good HTML editor that does color highlighting & understands PHP? My favorite editor is HomeSite, and I have yet to find anything comparable for Linux. I've tried running HomeSite with WINE, but haven't gotten that to work :( thanks for any suggest

Re: To: Looking for good HTML editor

On 24 Jul, Cuno Sonnemans wrote: |I agree, but my frames option and script option in the | toolbar isn't working. Do you know what causes this problem. | Or is it just not implementated jet. | | Cuno | | I think they're not implemented yet :( After all it's not yet to

Re: To: Looking for good HTML editor

egm2@jps.net wrote: > I recently installed webmaker (a kde package). So far, it looks to be > an excellent web page editor. Some features: > > 1) Color Syntax highlighting > 2) Auto indent, lcase all tags > 3) HTML 4.0 compliance (so the docs say) > 4) TAGS list/insertion > 5) Standard file editin

To: Looking for good HTML editor

I recently installed webmaker (a kde package). So far, it looks to be an excellent web page editor. Some features: 1) Color Syntax highlighting 2) Auto indent, lcase all tags 3) HTML 4.0 compliance (so the docs say) 4) TAGS list/insertion 5) Standard file editing capabilities 6) Spawn external bro

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

* Steve Lamb | | On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:11:58 -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: | | >What is there that BBEdit can do that Emacs can't? | | Emacs isn't an editor. Agreed. It's an editor-builder. -- Gravity brings me down.

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

>> "Carl" == Carl Mummert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Carl> What I still haven't found is the equivilent of 'indent' for Carl> html files, that will neaten up my code, single-case my Carl> tags,etc. Maybe this from unstable: Package: tidy Priority: optional Section: web Maintainer: Johnie Ingram

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

On Wed Jul 21, 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 15:47:02- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I would not mind something that could: > >1. Gives color coding > >2. Be good for perl AND html AND cgi AND javascript (I doubt I'll get all 4) > >3. Let me save to a web server. > >4. The only

BBEdit parallels (was Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?)

> Is there anything Linux-friendly with anything approaching the feature > set of the program that I am used to, BBEdit on the Power Macintosh... BBEdit is just about the best text editor for the Macintosh, at least it was about 2 years ago. IMO, it's best strength was that you can use real regul

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Sean wrote: > ugh! > > > Halis Osman Erkan wrote: > > > Why do not you try to use Netscape Composer? Or Amaya? I've used bot Netscape and Amaya. Both of them are good in my opinion. - hv

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

ugh! Halis Osman Erkan wrote: > Why do not you try to use Netscape Composer? > > Halis Osman ERKAN > Ege University Dep. Of Comp Eng. > Sophomore >

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

Why do not you try to use Netscape Composer? Halis Osman ERKAN Ege University Dep. Of Comp Eng. Sophomore On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Chris Beaumont wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just curious what people are using to write HTML with on Debian, > > The available editors ive tried so far all seem *so*

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

At 11:24 AM 7/21/99 -0700, you wrote: >Hello, > > I'm just curious what people are using to write HTML with on Debian, > >The available editors ive tried so far all seem *so* clunky and unsuited >to the task... cut and paste works irregularly if at all, no facilities >for previewing.. etc. Am I

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

VIM does HTML text highlighting, runs in a terminal and it much easier to learn and configure the all that emacs stuff. Just run your favorite browser simultaneously, when you make changes to the page, reload it in the browser. It's not beautiful, but it works. IMHO emacs tries to do too much for

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

Chris Beaumont writes: > Hello, > > Basically what I'm looking for is a workhorse editor that I can use as > my main HTML tool. I use Emacs with html-helper-mode (http://www.santafe.edu/~nelson/tools/) > Any suggestions are welcome.. I'm also looking for HTML template and > preprocessor s

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 15:47:02- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I would not mind something that could: >1. Gives color coding >2. Be good for perl AND html AND cgi AND javascript (I doubt I'll get all 4) >3. Let me save to a web server. >4. The only time

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 11:24:46AM -0700, Chris Beaumont wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just curious what people are using to write HTML with on Debian, > > The available editors ive tried so far all seem *so* clunky and unsuited > to the task... cut and paste works irregularly if at all, no facilit

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > XEmacs works for me, but if your system is low-memory (less than 16M), > you might use something else. No idea what, though, since I never had that > problem. > Andrew > www.coffeecup.com OK

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

I am doing quite a bit of web stuff now, but up until now have been doing it through an xterm->telnet to web server->joe, black on white. I tried BlueFish, but the preview in netscape button caused it to crash. I would not mind something that could: 1. Gives color coding 2. Be good for perl AND h

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

There is BlueFish html editor, nice free, we got a .deb of it in potato and CoffeeCup (demo free) 40 doller comercial full verion www.coffeecup.com Steve Buddha Buck wrote: > > Steve Lamb said: > > > > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:24:46 -0700, Chris Beaumont wrote: > > >

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:11:58 -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: >What is there that BBEdit can do that Emacs can't? Emacs isn't an editor. - -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 |

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 01:14:43PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Chris Beaumont wrote: > > > Basically what I'm looking for is a workhorse editor that I can use as > > my main HTML tool. > > > > Is there anything Linux-friendly with anything approaching the feature > > set of

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

>> to the task... cut and paste works irregularly if >> at all, no facilities for previewing.. Previewing is not such a large issue on a machine that has a functional http daemon running. Just edit the pages in-place and look at them with your favorite browser, hitting 'reload' when you need t

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

XEmacs works for me, but if your system is low-memory (less than 16M), you might use something else. No idea what, though, since I never had that problem. Andrew --- Andrei S. Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMA

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

Steve Lamb said: > > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:24:46 -0700, Chris Beaumont wrote: > > >Is there anything Linux-friendly with anything approaching the feature > >set of the program that I am used to, BBEdit on the Power Macintosh... > > No. What is there that BBEdit can do that Emacs can't?

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

I don't know what features BBEdit has, but when I'm doing HTML stuff in X I like to use WebMaker as an editor. Bluefish is also pretty nice, but it doesn't yet have syntax highlighting, which I'm pretty much hooked on. You can get WebMaker by adding the following line in your /etc/apt/sources.l

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

>> "Chris" == Chris Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris> Is there anything Linux-friendly with anything approaching the Chris> feature set of the program that I am used to, BBEdit on the Chris> Power Macintosh... I don't know BBEdit. I use XEmacs. In .emacs, you put (autoload 'html-mode

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:24:46 -0700, Chris Beaumont wrote: >Is there anything Linux-friendly with anything approaching the feature >set of the program that I am used to, BBEdit on the Power Macintosh... No. - -- Steve C. Lamb

Re: Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

i'd suggest XEmacs. works *great* for all your editing needs, including HTML, and other code. IMHO -punkigor --- Chris Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just curious what people are using to write > HTML with on Debian, > > The available editors ive tried so far all see

Good HTML editor for debian Linux?

Hello, I'm just curious what people are using to write HTML with on Debian, The available editors ive tried so far all seem *so* clunky and unsuited to the task... cut and paste works irregularly if at all, no facilities for previewing.. etc. Am I missing some obvious choice? Ive used Gxedit

  1   2   >