hi-
I am running into a big issue with debian and the ibm x3650 7979.
When the system boots up - i get the error :aacraid: Host adapter reset request
I have googled it and come up nothing.
I have tried to update firmware on it as well as fiddle in the bios
disabling a couple of features.
WHen the
HT in the BIOS and tried to boot the new
kernel. It then failed to recognize my SCSI host adapter, or rather,
stated that it tried to use IRQ 0:
PCI: Enabling device 02:0a.0 ( -> 0003)
PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 02:0a.0. Please try using
pci=biosirq.
sym.2.10.0:
want to install debian Woody 3.0 on my new pc. This Pc is a Dell
> > Precision 350 with e segate scsi disk and a LSI LOGIC host adapter. I
> > use bf24 kernel but woody don't now my hardware. i try vanilla,
> > compact but i obtain the same result. Suse use a mtp-fusion d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 January 2003 15:36, Paolo Ghidini wrote:
> I want to install debian Woody 3.0 on my new pc. This Pc is a Dell
> Precision 350 with e segate scsi disk and a LSI LOGIC host adapter. I
> use bf24 kernel but woody don't now my h
I want to install debian Woody 3.0 on my new pc. This Pc is a Dell Precision
350 with e segate scsi disk and a LSI LOGIC host adapter. I use bf24 kernel
but woody don't now my hardware. i try vanilla, compact but i obtain the same
result. Suse use a mtp-fusion driver but on lsi-logic web s
Hi there,
I have a problem on installing Linux. Can you help me? My problem is, when I
start installing Linux, I use a boot disk to load Linux and uncompress it. Is
it correct? But when it is loading, it stop at "HOST ADAPTER ERROR CODE=236".
Do you know what is the error and what s
Hi there,
I have a problem on installing Linux. Can you help me? My problem is, when I
start installing Linux, I use a boot disk to load Linux and uncompress it. Is
it correct? But when it is loading, it stop at "HOST ADAPTER ERROR CODE=236".
Do you know what is the error and what s
Hi there,
I have a problem on installing Linux. Can you help me? My problem is, when I
start installing Linux, I use a boot disk to load Linux and uncompress it. Is
it correct? But when it is loading, it stop at "HOST ADAPTER ERROR CODE=236".
Do you know what is the error and what s
On Mon, Sep 15, 1997 at 01:11:07PM +0100, Paolo Ciliegi wrote:
>
> I'm using a DEBIAN Linux version 1.1.
> I installed an AVA 1505 AT-to-SCSI host adapter.
> Do you know where I can find a driver for this
> SCSI host adapter ?
> Thanks
> Paolo
If my guess is right
I'm using a DEBIAN Linux version 1.1.
I installed an AVA 1505 AT-to-SCSI host adapter.
Do you know where I can find a driver for this
SCSI host adapter ?
Thanks
Paolo
---
Paolo Ciliegi| Phone
On Tue, Sep 09, 1997 at 09:37:27PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > "F" == F Potorti writes:
>
> F> I am resending this, this time to the mailing list. I suspect
> F> that the list-group gateway is not bidirectional, is that true?
>
> F> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Noxon) writes:
> "F" == F Potorti writes:
F> I am resending this, this time to the mailing list. I suspect
F> that the list-group gateway is not bidirectional, is that true?
F> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Noxon) writes:
F> If you think going buslogic, the following are very recommended
I am resending this, this time to the mailing list. I suspect that
the list-group gateway is not bidirectional, is that true?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Noxon) writes:
Note that the non-CPU FlashPoint models are the only ones available
with twin-bus configurations. BusLogic is marketing t
THANK YOU SO MUCH for all infos, I won't miss the doc and WEB site
you suggested (I also think they will deal with possible/real transfer
rates, of course related to the kind of hard disk or other device you
connect to the card).
Cheers.
Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was mention of a specific model, Buslogic BT-948: is it such a
> "low-end" card or one with that CPU onboard?
The BT-948 and all other "MultiMaster" models have onboard CPUs. The 948
is BusLogic's equivalent to the Adaptec 2940U. The 95
BusLogic supports free software and is well supported under Linux?
Very well. Probably I'll have one customer of mine buy new machines very
soon, they will buy what I say. (Maybe me too - going to buy a new
harddisk - will replace my Adaptec 2940 with a BusLogic instead of a
2940UW or 3940W o
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997 09:27:41 -0700 (PDT), Steve Witt wrote:
>I'm hoping that someone with some SCSI experience can give me some
>advice here.
Look no further...you may accept my recommandation as the word of god.
Buy a DPT. If a DPT is too expensive, buy a Buslogic. End of choices.
(Don't buy ada
Steve Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm hoping that someone with some SCSI experience can give me some
> advice here.
My general impression is that the three best manufacturers to consider
are Buslogic, Adaptec, and for really serious SCSI, DPT. I've always
used Adaptec, but that's just bec
I endorsed.
Jeff Noxon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 1997 at 09:27:41AM -0700, Steve Witt wrote:
> [snip]
> > I've read the SCSI HOW-TO and it seems to highly recommend the Buslogic
> > series of boards. All of my Windows friends tell me that the Adaptec
> > boards are the only way to go. In looki
> My questions are: Is the Buslogic board really better than the Adaptec?
A hardware is good when the driver is stable.
> Is the Buslogic better supported in Linux than the Adaptec? Is the
> difference worth it?
yes.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
On Wed, Sep 03, 1997 at 09:27:41AM -0700, Steve Witt wrote:
[snip]
> I've read the SCSI HOW-TO and it seems to highly recommend the Buslogic
> series of boards. All of my Windows friends tell me that the Adaptec
> boards are the only way to go. In looking at my normal stores, both local
This is
I'm hoping that someone with some SCSI experience can give me some
advice here. I'm contemplating buying a SyJet 1.5 GB drive and need to
get a SCSI host adapter as this will be the first SCSI peripheral I have
installed on this machine (Dell 200 MHz PPro). Basically, I'm havi
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, David M wrote:
> > > Plug and Play SCAM support
> > > --
> > > The default setting is disabled. They mention in the manual that if
> > > enabled than SCSI ID are automatically assigned to those SCSI devices
> > > that support SCAM. Those that don't
> > Plug and Play SCAM support
> > --
> > The default setting is disabled. They mention in the manual that if
> > enabled than SCSI ID are automatically assigned to those SCSI devices
> > that support SCAM. Those that don't usually are not affected (except
> > some olde
On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, David M wrote:
> Plug and Play SCAM support
> --
> The default setting is disabled. They mention in the manual that if
> enabled than SCSI ID are automatically assigned to those SCSI devices
> that support SCAM. Those that don't usually are not af
es
:whether the host adapter supports the fast transfer rates (13.4,16,20.0)
:of Ultra SCSI devices.
:
:Should I enable this for Linux? Would the driver support it?
I turned it on. On boot, the disks are synchronous at 20 MHz. They
seem to scream right along.
:
:If you have experience with Ad
isable work.
Obciously this is a DOS cludge... ;) and I assume Linux will not require it.
Would it be better under Linux to disable this setting???
Support for Ultra SCSI Speed
The default setting is disabled. The manual says this option determines
whether the h
With kernel-image 2.0.6, my aha152x controller was configured by a
kernel command line parameter, "aha152x=0x340,9,7,1" I upgraded to
kernel-image 2.0.25 and "modprobe aha152x aha152x=0x340,9,7,1",
which should do the exact same thing, tells me:
invalid module argument: aha152x=0x340,9,7,1
initiali
28 matches
Mail list logo
