On Thu, 15 Apr, 1999 à 08:09:22AM -0400, David B.Teague wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: HELP! All SCSI, no is09660 fs
> >
> Now: Please, someone explain why code pages are needed
> for the iso9660 file system. This was not true fo
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Subject: Re: HELP! All SCSI, no is09660 fs
>
> More to the point, you must set "Enable Native Language Support" to "Y".
Nathan
You put your finger on it. I just did not believe it.
(Lack of understanding.) It was n
On Wed, 14 Apr, 1999 à 04:34:09PM -0400, David B.Teague wrote:
> ii kernel-source-2 2.0.34-4 Linux kernel source.
[...]
> Native language support (Unicode, codepages) (CONFIG_NLS) [N/y/m/?] (NEW)
You must answer Y or M to this question to get the question about iso9660
--
( >- Laurent
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, David B.Teague wrote:
[ snip ]
: I did and 2.0.34 DOES NOT OFFER ME ISO9660 FILE SYSTEM AS A CHOICE.
: I'm going back to see if by chance the guy who suggested Native
: Language support might be right, in spite of the fact that this
: does not make sense to me.
No-one s
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, David B.Teague wrote:
> I'm going back to see if by chance the guy who suggested Native
> Language support might be right, in spite of the fact that this
> does not make sense to me.
I started to reply earlier that I vaguely remembered someone once saying
that it wasn't calle
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Kent West wrote:
> From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: HELP! All SCSI, no is09660 fs
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, David B.Teague wrote:
> I've just looked through my configuration on a 2.2.1
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, David B.Teague wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, ktb wrote:
>
> > > How do I force cause the kernel's make config to offer
> > > me an iso9660 file system? Or how do I hack the .config to get
> > > that fs?
> >
> > If your looking for iso9660 I think you enable that und
Subject: Re: HELP! All SCSI, no is09660 fs
Date: Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 12:56:34PM -0400
In reply to:David B.Teague
Quoting David B.Teague([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, ktb wrote:
>
> > > How do I force cause the kernel's make co
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, ktb wrote:
> > How do I force cause the kernel's make config to offer
> > me an iso9660 file system? Or how do I hack the .config to get
> > that fs?
>
> If your looking for iso9660 I think you enable that under "File
> systems." At least in 'make xconfig' if I remembe
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Tony Crawford wrote:
> David B.Teague wrote (on 13 Apr 99, at 21:58):
> >
> > ... how do I hack the .config to get [the iso9660] fs?
>
> If you wanna go that last route, open /usr/src/linux/.config and
> find:
> #
> # Filesystems
> #
> CONFIG_QUOTA=y
> CONFIG_MINIX_FS=y
[sni
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, ktb wrote:
[ snip ]
: > How do I force cause the kernel's make config to offer
: > me an iso9660 file system? Or how do I hack the .config to get
: > that fs?
:
: If your looking for iso9660 I think you enable that under "File
: systems." At least in 'make xconfig'
"David B.Teague" wrote:
>
> All:
>
> This is a Second Request. I really need an answer.
>
> I have the following kernel related packages installed,
> according to dpkg -l
>
> ii kernel-headers- 2.0.32-5 Linux kernel headers.
> ii kernel-image-2. custon.1.0 Linux kernel binary image.
All:
This is a Second Request. I really need an answer.
I have the following kernel related packages installed,
according to dpkg -l
ii kernel-headers- 2.0.32-5 Linux kernel headers.
ii kernel-image-2. custon.1.0 Linux kernel binary image.
ii kernel-package 4.11 Debian L
13 matches
Mail list logo
