Hi Johann,
Quoth Johann Spies,
> Excuse my ignorance, but after reading lynx's man page, I still do not
> understand what is actually happening in a command like this or let me
> put it this way: I do not understand how it can help to install
> helix-gnome or why it has to be run as root. As I u
Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I installed helix gnome in this way, and have since put the helix
> stuff in my sources file and have been getting updates from them, is
> there something else I should do to right it? I've noticed that
> task-helix-gnome is always held back and never u
| > -Original Message-
| > From: Johann Spies [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:23 AM
| > To: Debian
| > Subject:Re: HELIX and potato
| >
| > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:19:40PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
| > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000
P:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:23 AM
> To: Debian
> Subject: Re: HELIX and potato
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:19:40PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> > > lynx -source htt
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:19:40PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> > lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh
>
> we have been through this before, don't EVER run anything like that.
>
Excuse my ignorance, but after reading lynx's man page,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:57:12AM +1300, plutoplanet wrote:
> I guess so, but is it any more a security risk than running a binary
> from helixcode?
yes
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpkjLrRX3r1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> I don't know if this is the preferred way to get Helix Gnome
> installed, but I typed this at the command prompt and it worked...
>
> lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh
we have been through this before, don't EVER run anything like
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:33:17PM -0500, Anderson, Tim wrote:
> The best way would surely be to add the helixcode site to sources.list.
Yes. The first below will get you Helix; after 'apt-get update' look for the
'task' debs. iirc 'apt-get install task-helix-gnome' will get you the
complete Gnom
> Debian Ghost said these things on 20001106.1400:
> | Hey Guys,
> | I notice that there is no helix gnome package for potato.
> | Is there an eazy way to implement helix into potato? I am using regular
> | gnome and want to go to helix.
The "woody" helix packages work fine in potato. I guess the
well, the binaries wouldn't be run as root, so yes.
> -Original Message-
> Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
>
> I guess so, but is it any more a security risk than running a binary
> from helixcode?
>
> Original Message
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
I guess so, but is it any more a security risk than running a binary
from helixcode?
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:33:17 -0500
>
>Wasn't there some discussion about this metho
I don't know if this is the preferred way to get Helix Gnome
installed, but I typed this at the command prompt and it worked...
lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh
-Rob.
Debian Ghost said these things on 20001106.1400:
| Hey Guys,
| I notice that there is no helix gnome package for potato.
| I
, November 06, 2000 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
>
> Login as root and do the following:
> #lynx -source http://go-gnome.com | sh
>
Login as root and do the following:
#lynx -source http://go-gnome.com | sh
Good Luck
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:00:16 -0500 (EST)
>Hey Guys,
>I notice that there is no helix
Hey Guys,
I notice that there is no helix gnome package for potato.
Is there an eazy way to implement helix into potato? I am using regular
gnome and want to go to helix.
Any advice?
Thanks!
D. Ghost
15 matches
Mail list logo
