/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
I have mentioned before, but I don't remember on which list, that the
PCLINUXOS live CD in the
live section (as well as the inst
My bad. It was a hard day with lots of beer =D
But doesn't change the fact you shouldn't touch /boot anymore, everything is
done in /etc/default/grub and /etc/grub.d then processed by update-grub(2).
2010/9/21 Andrei Popescu
> On Ma, 21 sep 10, 17:41:53, Eric Viseur wrote:
> > Since Squeeze Gru
On Ma, 21 sep 10, 17:41:53, Eric Viseur wrote:
> Since Squeeze Grub2 (1.98 actually) is used instead of Grub. Use
> update-grub2.
,[ /usr/sbin/update-grub2 ]
| #!/bin/sh
| set -e
| exec update-grub "$@"
`
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://
(testing installer). During
> >> installation d-i properly reported finding Vista. However after
> >> reboot, there was no option in grub for it.
> >> I then followed instructions from:
> >>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initr
ter
>> reboot, there was no option in grub for it.
>> I then followed instructions from:
>> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
>> But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
>>
>> Is there another more up to date d
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
instructions from:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
> But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
>
> Is there another more up to date documentation ?
>
> Thanks !
Run update-grub as root
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-u
I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
2010/1/9 s. keeling :
> Tom H :
>>
>> What is your 40... entry?
>
> Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
>
> # OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1
> title OpenBSD 4.6
> root (hd0,0)
> savedefault
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>
This is on menu.lst:
title OpenBSD
rootnoveri
gt;
>
> > I've a few leads to track down now:
>
> > sed '%s/hda/sda/g' /boot/grub/menu.lst # or something
> > update-grub # less /boot/grub/grub.cfg
>
> I hope that you are sed-ing
> /etc/grub.d/40_cus
>>>> What is your 40... entry?
>>> Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
>> (1a) There is no (hd0,0) in grub2. sda = (hd0,1), etc
> Ah! This is a most informative/educational reply, thanks.
You're welcome.
> I've a few leads to track down now:
t all the
bleeding-edge noobs complain about. grub2 may be beta, but it's been
there some time now, yes?
I've a few leads to track down now:
sed '%s/hda/sda/g' /boot/grub/menu.lst # or something
update-grub # less /boot/grub/grub.cf
>> What is your 40... entry?
> Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
> # OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1
> title OpenBSD 4.6
> root (hd0,0)
> savedefault
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>> Are you loading the ufs module(s)?
> Never heard of 'em. Will research, thanks.
(1a) There i
Klistvud :
> Dne, 08. 01. 2010 01:32:32 je s. keeling napisal(a):
> >
> > Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not
> > solved it.
>
> It would not be unwise to switch to Grub 2 (the new Grub that's slowly
> becoming the default in many distros). It stores its co
Tom H :
>
> What is your 40... entry?
Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
# OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1
title OpenBSD 4.6
root (hd0,0)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
> Are you loading the ufs module(s)?
Never heard of 'em. Will research, thanks.
--
Any te
eeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
> >
> > How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
> > I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
&
Dne, 08. 01. 2010 01:32:32 je s. keeling napisal(a):
Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not
solved it.
It would not be unwise to switch to Grub 2 (the new Grub that's slowly
becoming the default in many distros). It stores its configuration in
/boot/grub/gr
>> > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
>> > How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
>> > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
>> Testing uses grub2 b
Paul E Condon :
> On 20100106_033032, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
> >
> > How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains
; > How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
>
> You might be interested in grub-legacy, which is the grub you are
> used to.
Thanks. That's looking
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:17:40PM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 20:52 -0800, Freeman wrote:
> > Grub2 is the recommended default but still considered under development. So
> > was legacy I guess, it never reached V 1.0 . However, legacy still gives me
> > control over the look
d the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
> I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
> renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something.
>
> I'
t;
> How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
> I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
> renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or somethin
st time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
> >
> > How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
> > I can create it, but I'm expect
t;
> How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
> doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
> I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
> renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something
s. keeling wrote:
I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.)
sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the
first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boo
I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.)
sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the
first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doe
tered as *titleDebian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.26 (single-user
> mode)*in /boot/grub/menu.lst
>
> I installed this kernel image on my live cd, and then installed it to my
> hdd.
>
> Inspite of me making modifications to the kernel, its still showing *title
> Debian GNU/Linux,
8.10, and even
there the kernel was listed as that of Ubuntu..!!!
How do I change this title to that of my own?
How to customize the kernel title in /boot/grub/menu.lst automatically
without user interven?
Its a fair thing that if i customize a kernel according to my need, I should
be able to use a
Hello,
i'm wondering if there's a alternative "groot" directive similar to
"altoptions"?
Background:
I'm running /boot on a software RAID-1
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1])
and i'd like to have a fallback menu item in menu.lst liek this:
default 0
fallback1
title
Hello,
i'm wondering if there's a alternative "groot" directive similar to
"altoptions" in menu.lst?
Background:
I'm running /boot on a software RAID-1
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1])
and i'd like to have a fallback menu item in menu.lst like this:
default 0
fallback
Jeff D:
>
> You really shouldn't have to add anything to see 2G of ram. If you
> aren't I suspect that there is something else going on with your system.
It's a hardware and/or Linux bug.
J.
--
I no longer believe in father christmas but have no trouble
comprehending a nuclear apocalypse.
[Ag
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:01:29PM +, andy wrote:
>## If you want special options for specific kernels use kopt_x_y_z
>## e.g. kopt=root=/dev/hda1 ro
>## kopt_2_6_8=root=/dev/hdc1 ro
>## kopt_2_6_8_2_686=root=/dev/hdc2 ro
># kopt=root=/dev/hda1 ro quiet
>
> It is
Jeff D wrote:
andy wrote:
Hi all
I'm seeking some advice on the best option to enable my 2.6.22-3-686
kernel to utilise the 2Gb RAM properly.
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
th
andy wrote:
Hi all
I'm seeking some advice on the best option to enable my 2.6.22-3-686
kernel to utilise the 2Gb RAM properly.
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file
Jochen Schulz wrote:
andy:
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file, the relevant section appears to be this commented
part:
## should update-grub create memtest86 boot
andy:
>
> What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
> enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
> through this file, the relevant section appears to be this commented
> part:
>
> ## should update-grub create
Hi all
I'm seeking some advice on the best option to enable my 2.6.22-3-686
kernel to utilise the 2Gb RAM properly.
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file, the rel
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:35:14 -0400, KS wrote:
> Is there a way that each of them can update grub (initrd, vmlinuz,
> menu.lst etc.) automatically upon a kernel upgrade?
Simple, run
update-grub
after you've upgraded your kernel. Ref:
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/nix/disk/boot/boot06-Gr
Hi all,
I have been trying to find out how to get grub updated for both
Debian(Sid) and the recently installed Gutsy(pre-release). Ubuntu's
installed installed Grub on hd0 automatically without prompting and I
had to reinstall it using Debian's /boot.
Is there a way that each of them can update g
On 9/2/07, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 应富鸣 wrote:
> > I saw /etc/grub.conf once (maybe under Ubuntu). It seems that
> > /etc/grub.conf is just a link of /boot/grub/menu.lst or
> > /boot/grub/grub.conf.
I have no clue about mondo... But the thing is t
应富鸣 wrote:
I saw /etc/grub.conf once (maybe under Ubuntu). It seems that
/etc/grub.conf is just a link of /boot/grub/menu.lst or
/boot/grub/grub.conf.
But if you make it a link you get an infinite loop when using the mondo
restore CD: it has to be a regular file.
On 9/2/07, Hugo
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Anybody understand the relation between these 2?
>
> Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf and that is what you get to edit on a
> restore from CD.
>
> But it seems that Debian only uses /boot/grub/menu
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf and that is what you get to edit on a
> restore from CD.
Other distributions store it here; notably Fedora.
> But it seems that Debian only uses /boot/grub/menu.lst and that is what
>
I saw /etc/grub.conf once (maybe under Ubuntu). It seems that
/etc/grub.conf is just a link of /boot/grub/menu.lst or
/boot/grub/grub.conf.
On 9/2/07, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Anybody understand the relation between these 2?
>
> Mondo insis
Hi,
Anybody understand the relation between these 2?
Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf and that is what you get to edit on a
restore from CD.
But it seems that Debian only uses /boot/grub/menu.lst and that is what
update-grub updates.
Anybody?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
b McGowan about using labels on
the partitions, so I went back and reloaded sarge and changed the fstab
to the LABEL configuration. When I reboot everything works fine.
However, when I then try changing the /boot/grub/menu.lst to use the
LABEL configuration, like so:
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.
g labels on the partitions, so I went
back and reloaded sarge and changed the fstab to the LABEL configuration. When
I reboot everything works fine. However, when I then try changing the
/boot/grub/menu.lst to use the LABEL configuration, like so:
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.27-3-386 root=LABEL=root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hdb/boot/grub/menu.lst,
not to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
"grub-install /dev/hda" is execute
2006/8/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
this is not a real path, how did you do it.
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hdb/boot/grub/menu.lst,
not to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
"grub-install /dev/hda" is executed.
Will grub then know
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
"grub-install /dev/hda" is executed.
Will grub then know to use the menu.lst on hdb?
If so, how
I am rebuilding a 2.6.5 Debian system and everything is
working properly so far. The system had ext2 file systems and used
lilo and now has a ext3 journalling file system on the master drive.
It also uses the grub boot loader and appears to be healthy.
Before I rebuilt it, I used scsi emul
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Le Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:36:57AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Except one thing : both kernel certainly dont have support for you
root partition filesystem, but the Debian one can find the appropriate
module in its initrd. I bet that your kerne
Le Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:36:57AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
> Francois Cerbelle wrote:
> >Except one thing : both kernel certainly dont have support for you
> >root partition filesystem, but the Debian one can find the appropriate
> >module in its initrd. I bet that your kernel doesnt have
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> > I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
> > and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
> >
> > I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source. My problem is
Ok, I understand. However, I use kernel-images and I don't have
problems. My USB ports works fine!
Regards,
Eriberto
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
I don't like the pre-compiled kernel-images. I have tried three of
them and have had a lot of problems with each of them. I've compiled
about a half
Eriberto wrote:
A suggestion. Why you don't install kernel wich apt-get install
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-i686? I think your compilation don't has success.
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source.
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Le Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 03:42:27PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel
Le Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 03:42:27PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
> I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
> and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
> I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
> later insta
A suggestion. Why you don't install kernel wich apt-get install
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-i686? I think your compilation don't has success.
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source. My problem is th
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source. My problem is that now I
get a kernel
63 matches
Mail list logo
