Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-11 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > *- On 11 Feb, Raymond A. Ingles wrote about "Re: Greater than 64 MB memory" > > > > How old is your BIOS? Older BIOSes can only report 64MB of memory. Newer > > ones have a new function that can report more. If your B

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-11 Thread servis
*- On 11 Feb, Raymond A. Ingles wrote about "Re: Greater than 64 MB memory" > On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> *- On 11 Feb, Garrick Chien Welsh wrote about "Re: Greater than 64 MB memory" > [...] >> When I switched to 2.2.1 I removed m

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-11 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > *- On 11 Feb, Garrick Chien Welsh wrote about "Re: Greater than 64 MB memory" [...] > When I switched to 2.2.1 I removed my mem=96m from my loadlin line and > the kernel still only found 64M of memory. Strange. I wonder why t

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-11 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Garrick Chien Welsh wrote: > The easiest way is to upgrade to a kernel later than 2.0.36 (2.2.1 would > be preferable). Kernels before that don't recognise memory above 64M and > and have to be told about it on the lilo configuration file. Like so. > > image=/bzImage >roo

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-11 Thread servis
*- On 11 Feb, Garrick Chien Welsh wrote about "Re: Greater than 64 MB memory" > The easiest way is to upgrade to a kernel later than 2.0.36 (2.2.1 would > be preferable). Kernels before that don't recognise memory above 64M and > and have to be told about it on the lilo con

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-10 Thread Garrick Chien Welsh
The easiest way is to upgrade to a kernel later than 2.0.36 (2.2.1 would be preferable). Kernels before that don't recognise memory above 64M and and have to be told about it on the lilo configuration file. Like so. image=/bzImage root=/dev/hda5 label=linux append='mem=80M' read-only

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-10 Thread Alec Smith
Or you could download 2.0.36/2.2.1 kernel source, which should recognize the memory. At 11:29 AM 2/10/99 -0800, Mike Garfias wrote: >Sebastian Canagaratna spoke forth with the blessed manuscript: >> I have just installed 80 MB memory ( old was 16, and I added >> 64 MB ). I am using Debian linux

Re: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-10 Thread Mike Garfias
Sebastian Canagaratna spoke forth with the blessed manuscript: > I have just installed 80 MB memory ( old was 16, and I added > 64 MB ). I am using Debian linux 2.0.2. When the machine > boots up it does not recognize the whole memory ( I believe > it recognizes only about 64 MB. I did man lilo.con

RE: Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-10 Thread Shaleh
On 10-Feb-99 Sebastian Canagaratna wrote: > I have just installed 80 MB memory ( old was 16, and I added > 64 MB ). I am using Debian linux 2.0.2. When the machine > boots up it does not recognize the whole memory ( I believe > it recognizes only about 64 MB. I did man lilo.conf but this > did not

Greater than 64 MB memory

1999-02-10 Thread Sebastian Canagaratna
I have just installed 80 MB memory ( old was 16, and I added 64 MB ). I am using Debian linux 2.0.2. When the machine boots up it does not recognize the whole memory ( I believe it recognizes only about 64 MB. I did man lilo.conf but this did not have any way of getting it to recognize the extra me