Re: google-chrome printer/copier error

On 02/02/2025 10:39, John Conover wrote: [2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \ Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \ object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \ Did not receive a reply. Does anyone k

Re: google-chrome printer/copier error

On Sat 01 Feb 2025 at 19:39:55 (-0800), John Conover wrote: > > [2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \ > Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \ > object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \ > Did not receiv

google-chrome printer/copier error

[2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \ Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \ object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \ Did not receive a reply. Does anyone know where freedesktop is from: org.free

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de: I was successful at downloading the video with: yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c https://manifest.prod.boltdns.net/manifest/v1/hls/v4/clear/1241706627001/83ddeca4-2e3a-4149-840f-0ca907c2cb59/10s/master.m3u8?fastly_token=Nj

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

Am 31.03.2023 um 00:28 schrieb l0f...@tuta.io: > How do you get that URL? Via your browser resource/code inspector? Hi, i had been asking not having to answer that question, because i myself do not really understand, how it works. I stumbled across an explanation while skimming through open issue

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

Hi, 30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de: > I was successful at downloading the video with: > >> yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c >> https://manifest.prod.boltdns.net/manifest/v1/hls/v4/clear/1241706627001/83ddeca4-2e3a-4149-840f-0ca907c2cb59/10s/master.m3u8?fastl

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 23:28:23 +0200 (CEST) l0f...@tuta.io wrote: Hello l0f...@tuta.io, >Interesting theory but I can play that specific video in my browser >without being logged in ;) Weird; I had to log in first. No idea why your experience differs. Still, as this doesn't forward the core issu

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

Am 30.03.2023 um 20:20 schrieb Bret Busby: > On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote: >> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: >>> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote: On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: > I had previously been able to use youtu

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

Hello Brad, 30 mars 2023, 23:20 de b...@fineby.me.uk: > >In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation > >says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work > >for familysearch.org visibly... > > Largely, I suspect, it's because to access video on th

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:55:05 +0200 (CEST) l0f...@tuta.io wrote: Hello l0f...@tuta.io, >In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation >says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work >for familysearch.org visibly... Largely, I suspect, it's becaus

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

Hello, 30 mars 2023, 20:46 de b...@busby.net: > Fri Mar 31 02:18:31 bret@bret-Precision-Tower-5810:~$yt-dlp > https://www.familysearch.org/rootstech/session/expanding-your-family-tree-with-sideview-and-more-innovations-from-ancestrydna?lang=eng > [generic] > expanding-your-family-tree-with-side

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote: On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote: On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from youtube, but, it no longer work

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:08:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: [...] > Writing "did not work" just doesn't cut it on this list: > we need some specifics. Here's an example I ran this > morning on a reference given by David Christensen: T

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: > On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote: > > On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: > > > > > I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from > > > youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube. > >

Re: youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote: On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube. AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp. You can downlo

youtube-dl → yt-dlp, was Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: > I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from > youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube. AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp. You can download it from bullseye-backports. If you'

Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

On 2023-03-30, Bret Busby wrote: > > I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from > youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube. > If you're not using the latest version, this is it: https://youtube-dl.org/downloads/latest/youtube-dl-2021.12.17.tar.gz I used this (or

Re: OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

. Conspiracy theories tossed aside, that's still a rational possibility that needs pursued on my end here. BUT THEN... Google Chrome does work properly. That's why I haven't wasted any time nor brain storage on actively investigating local ISP throttling as a most likely answer. :)

OT: Detecting ISP throttling (was: Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.)

tossed aside, that's still a rational possibility that needs > pursued on my end here. > > BUT THEN... Google Chrome does work properly. That's why I haven't > wasted any time nor brain storage on actively investigating local ISP > throttling as a most likely answe

Re: Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.

On 3/26/23, Juan R.D. Silva wrote: > Hi folks, > > Debian Bullseye here up to date. Browsers installed: Firefox, Opera, > Vivaldi, and Google Chrome. > > I'm having a weird problem streaming movies from archive.org. The movies > are lagging & keep buffering in

Potentially OT. Videos lagging & buffering in any browser but Google Chrome.

Hi folks, Debian Bullseye here up to date. Browsers installed: Firefox, Opera, Vivaldi, and Google Chrome. I'm having a weird problem streaming movies from archive.org. The movies are lagging & keep buffering in all browsers but Google Chrome. Google Chrome streams same movies at

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

Corentin Bardet writes: > I think you have no other option than using Google Chrome for your > meetings. Screen sharing works in Firefox ESR on Wayland. So I still have options. Just that few features - like blur background etc. doesn't work in FF.

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

epository. Clicking on the share-screen icon and then selecting any of > > the three options - Tab, Windows, Entire Screen - shows this error > > message, > > > > "Your browser can't share your screen" > > > > But if I install and use Google Chrome

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

n and then selecting any of the three options - Tab, Windows, Entire Screen - shows this error message, "Your browser can't share your screen" But if I install and use Google Chrome, then the screen sharing works in Google Meet. That doesn't surprise me much. Google re

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

ndows, Entire Screen - shows this error message, "Your browser can't share your screen" But if I install and use Google Chrome, then the screen sharing works in Google Meet. That doesn't surprise me much. Google removed the majority of its APIs from Chromium : [here](http

Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

"Your browser can't share your screen" But if I install and use Google Chrome, then the screen sharing works in Google Meet.

Re: Google Chrome leaves processes around each time is closed

On 17/5/22 6:23 am, nimrod wrote: Hi, recently Google Chrome started to leave around a "chrome --enable-crashpad" process every time I closed it. Each of such processes sucks 25% of CPU. If I open another instance of Chrome and I close it, another process is created and reaches

Google Chrome leaves processes around each time is closed

Hi, recently Google Chrome started to leave around a "chrome --enable- crashpad" process every time I closed it. Each of such processes sucks 25% of CPU. If I open another instance of Chrome and I close it, another process is created and reaches the 25% of CPU, and so on and so forth.

Re: Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:40 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:37:04AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > > I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye > except > > the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable"

Re: Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 06:37 -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye except > the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable" and it has > been that way through several upgrades. > > The instruct

Re: Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:37:04AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye except > the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable" and it has > been that way through several upgrades. That's fi

Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye except the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable" and it has been that way through several upgrades. The instructions for the prep for the upgrade say that stable should be bullseye, but the text

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:54:22AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought > > in a new version of google-chrome-stable > > > > ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The w

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:16:27PM -, Curt wrote: > On 2022-01-05, David Wright wrote: > >> > >> As of this morning's update, dragging and dropping items in this game > >> doesn't work either. The dragging part appears to work correctly, as > >> far as I can tell -- there is visual feedback

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On 2022-01-05, David Wright wrote: >> >> As of this morning's update, dragging and dropping items in this game >> doesn't work either. The dragging part appears to work correctly, as >> far as I can tell -- there is visual feedback that a thing is being >> moved as I drag with the mouse. But wh

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

Greg Wooledge wrote: > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought > in a new version of google-chrome-stable > > ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The web browser from > Google > quoting from https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromiu

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

Greg Wooledge wrote: > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought > in a new version of google-chrome-stable > > ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The web browser from > Google > > After restarting in the new version of Chrome

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:13:46AM -0500, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > I don't have answers toward a permanent resolution but still wanted to > suggest that CTRL+SHIFT+[pageUP/pageDOWN] works for me to > alternatively move tabs around one position at a time. Am hoping that > also works (universally) i

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On 1/5/22, Greg Wooledge wrote: > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought > in a new version of google-chrome-stable > > ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The web browser from > Google > > After restarting in the new version o

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On Wed 05 Jan 2022 at 10:25:38 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:14:07AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought > > in a new version of google-chrome-stable > > > > ii google-c

Re: Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:14:07AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought > in a new version of google-chrome-stable > > ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The web browser from > Google > > Af

Dragging tabs in Google Chrome 97

This morning, I did my normal apt-get update/upgrade, and this brought in a new version of google-chrome-stable ii google-chrome-stable 97.0.4692.71-1 amd64The web browser from Google After restarting in the new version of Chrome, I am unable to move tabs around within a window. Any

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

pository that has a *small* package that I could download and install with apt-get install ./ for testing purposes, or I would have to purge my web browser, purge the Google repository from my sources.list.d, apt-get update to purge it from the cached lists, and then repeat the basic procedure of in

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

gt; > > Apt-get won't install local files, that is, not in a repo. > > > > Yes, it will. But you have to supply the filename with a > > leading / or ./ or ../ prefix. > > > > sudo apt-get install ./google-chrome-stable*.deb > > That never worked

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

27;t install local files, that is, not in a repo. >> >> Yes, it will. But you have to supply the filename with a >> leading / or ./ or ../ prefix. >> >> sudo apt-get install ./google-chrome-stable*.deb > > That never worked for me. I've tried. Numerous time

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

Yes, it will. But you have to supply the filename with a > leading / or ./ or ../ prefix. > > sudo apt-get install ./google-chrome-stable*.deb That never worked for me. I've tried. Numerous times. Even with complete paths, changing to directory where file was, full names, etc., et

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

ntire download process again here, > having already done it long ago. Suffice to say, there are no > detailed instructions on the wiki for how to do this, because it's > incredibly simple and obvious, and nobody should NEED detailed > instructions. > > You download the .deb

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

Greg Wooledge composed on 2018-11-21 11:50 (UTC-0500): > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:31:53AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> I did try ./google-chrome... but apt wouldn't find it. > In stretch, right? What was the exact command you used, and the exact > output? Sorry, I thou

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:31:53AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > I did try ./google-chrome... but apt wouldn't find it. In stretch, right? What was the exact command you used, and the exact output?

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

ill. But you have to supply the filename with a > leading / or ./ or ../ prefix. > sudo apt-get install ./google-chrome-stable*.deb > It will resolve the dependencies from your repositories and everything, > just like gdebi. I did try ./google-chrome... but apt wouldn't find it.

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

refix. sudo apt-get install ./google-chrome-stable*.deb It will resolve the dependencies from your repositories and everything, just like gdebi.

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 03:30:26 -0500 Felix Miata wrote: > (Stretch) > Downloading Chrome is easy. Installing is not. The download page says > "download and install", > but all that happens is firefox fetches, and no auto install via apt* or dpkg > is attempted. Apt > and aptitude won't install th

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

tware > >> Repositories" page says how to > >> configure GPG, but nothing about configuring repo in sources.list. Where > >> are the secret > >> incantations to be found? > > > The below link might be useful: > > > https://www.wikihow.com

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 04:44:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > It seems Curt's instructions to use dpkg to install the downloaded deb > resulted in > creation of /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list containing > > deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main >

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

One suggestion (and, yes, I'm intentionally top posting) -- why don't you repost you're reply with: * the Subject changed to say Solved (was: need G...) * Top post the solution in as concise a fashion as you can -- my first feeble partial attempt: "I had troub

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 04:44:14AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: [...] > It seems Curt's instructions to use dpkg to install the downloaded deb > resulted in > creation of /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list containing > > deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

Curt composed on 2018-11-21 09:15 (UTC): > Felix Miata wrote: >> (Stretch) >> Downloading Chrome is easy. Installing is not. The download page says >> "download and install", >> but all that happens is firefox fetches, and no auto install via apt* or >> dpkg is attempted. Apt >> and aptitude wo

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

ut configuring repo in sources.list. Where are >> the secret >> incantations to be found? > The below link might be useful: > https://www.wikihow.com/Install-Google-Chrome-Using-Terminal-on-Linux It worked. I had tried on previous occasions downloaded debs with 'dpkg

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

On 2018-11-21, Felix Miata wrote: > (Stretch) > Downloading Chrome is easy. Installing is not. The download page says > "download and install", > but all that happens is firefox fetches, and no auto install via apt* or dpkg > is attempted. Apt > and aptitude won't install the local file because

Re: need google chrome installation instructions that work

> incantations to be found? > The below link might be useful: https://www.wikihow.com/Install-Google-Chrome-Using-Terminal-on-Linux you should also consider googling "installing chrome on linux". -- John Doe

need google chrome installation instructions that work

(Stretch) Downloading Chrome is easy. Installing is not. The download page says "download and install", but all that happens is firefox fetches, and no auto install via apt* or dpkg is attempted. Apt and aptitude won't install the local file because it "isn't found". The https://www.google.com/li

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 03:05:13PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > On 01/14/2017 09:30 AM, solitone wrote: > >On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:15:11 AM CET Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > >>and on mine not! Hey, come on! You've installed a 3rd party package and you're asking on this list why it doesn't wo

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

On 01/14/2017 09:30 AM, solitone wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:15:11 AM CET Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: and on mine not! Are you on stretch as well? Davide Sid. Hugo

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

might block content on nbc. If so make sure nbc is white listed there also. Flash was blocked on all sites. Thanks Bob! *...Bob* On 01/13/2017 09:40 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi The Flash Player that comes with Google-Chrome has become more noisy with newer versions of Google-C

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

I should have also added the exception "[*.]nbcnews.com" as well as "[*.]nbc.com" in the flash chrome exception list. Sorry I missed that. *...Bob* On 01/13/2017 09:40 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi > > The Flash Player that comes with Google-Chrome has become mor

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:40:51 -0600 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi > > The Flash Player that comes with Google-Chrome has become more noisy > with newer versions of Google-Chrome. > > In the beginning Flash just displayed the video. > > Then it displayed the start symbol

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:15:11 AM CET Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > and on mine not! Are you on stretch as well? Davide

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

sure nbc is white listed there also. *...Bob* On 01/13/2017 09:40 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi > > The Flash Player that comes with Google-Chrome has become more noisy with > newer versions of Google-Chrome. > > In the beginning Flash just displayed the video. > > Then i

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

On 01/13/2017 11:30 PM, solitone wrote: That's strange. On mine the video is displayed. solitone@alan:~$ apt-cache policy google-chrome-stable google-chrome-stable: Installed: 55.0.2883.87-1 Candidate: 55.0.2883.87-1 Version table: *** 55.0.2883.87-1 500 500 http://dl.googl

Re: Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

That's strange. On mine the video is displayed. solitone@alan:~$ apt-cache policy google-chrome-stable google-chrome-stable: Installed: 55.0.2883.87-1 Candidate: 55.0.2883.87-1 Version table: *** 55.0.2883.87-1 500 500 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable/main

Problem google-chrome Flash Player with http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news

Hi The Flash Player that comes with Google-Chrome has become more noisy with newer versions of Google-Chrome. In the beginning Flash just displayed the video. Then it displayed the start symbol that you had to click in order for the video to start. Now it displays a puzzle piece with the

Re: google-chrome-stable vs. chromium

On Thursday 15 September 2016 11:28:49 Bob Bernstein wrote: > Aha. That describes me to a tee. Now, I put a premium on things > that "just work." So you have chosen well. Anyway, I do the same, for much the same reason, so it must be the right choice. ;-) (There are things I want to watch.) Li

Re: google-chrome-stable vs. chromium

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Eduardo Quagliato wrote: google-chrome-stable: Google's package, with its proprietary software in it (like flash and other things alike); chromium: Open-source project from which Google drawn its source (refer to http://www.chromium.org/); Thanks. Concise. I think

google-chrome-stable vs. chromium

I haven't posted a question from the far left end of the bell-shaped curve in some time, so please bear with me! In respect of my Subject: line, above, I have the first of those two packages installed. How does it differ from the second, which I do not have installed? Thank youse, -- IMPO

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Friday 03 June 2016 15:45:43 Mike McGinn wrote: > I am buying a new laptop in February, this one will be eight years old > by then. Then I shall start clean with Jessie. By next February (9 months away), shouldn't you be thinking of Stretch? It will probably already be full-frozen, and Jessie

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 06/03/2016 10:28 AM, SamuelOPH wrote: > ​Hi Mike,​ > > 2016-06-01 6:47 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn >: > > Hi Samuel, > It is not an issue of need, it is an issue of time. I am the software > engineer / server guy at work, so I use my laptop at work and

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

​Hi Mike,​ 2016-06-01 6:47 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn : > Hi Samuel, > It is not an issue of need, it is an issue of time. I am the software > engineer / server guy at work, so I use my laptop at work and home. When > I upgraded from Squeeze it tool more than eight hours. I simply do not > have a day

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 05/31/2016 11:15 PM, SamuelOPH wrote: > > 2016-05-31 21:21 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn >: > > Again, thanks for all the efforts. I am a bit surprised that there is > not an archive of old chrome versions. One would think they would have > the room with

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

2016-05-31 21:21 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn : > Again, thanks for all the efforts. I am a bit surprised that there is > not an archive of old chrome versions. One would think they would have > the room with all the email account space that they give away. > ​We both know it isn't a matter of space, i

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

ll > compile it. But this is of course not valid for Google Chrome. > > So the only remaining option for Wheezy is Firefox with Flash 11.2 > (which is still supported by Adobe). > > Again: time to update. > > Grüße, > Sven. > Thanks for all the effort. I do not have

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

No, Google does not care about Debian release cycles. The reason they stopped supporting Wheezy is because they need a newer C++ compiler and library with better C++11 support than offered by g++-4.7. >> Seems I can not install google-chrome-stable on Wheezy anymore. > > Yes, seems

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Sven Hartge writes: > > Seems I can not install google-chrome-stable on Wheezy anymore. > > Yes, seems that way. > > Only Chromium and Firefox remain. Or time to upgrade to Jessie finally. > Flash, (Pepperflash,) for Chromium no longer works in Wheezy i386. Perhaps Opera a

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > On 05/31/2016 02:31 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Mike McGinn wrote: >>> My system is 64 bit. I tried downloading from google with: >>> wget >>> http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/google-chrome-stable_50.0.2661.102-1_amd64.deb >> &

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > My system is 64 bit. I tried downloading from google with: > wget > http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/google-chrome-stable_50.0.2661.102-1_amd64.deb Try http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/pool/main/g/google-chrome-stable/google-chrome-stable_51.0.2704.63-1_

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

to install my previous working (though outdated) google-chrome-stable but I can not find a copy of the most recently installed version. Does anyone know where this might be found? Thanks, Mike Well as Sven said, Google has discontinued the 32 bit versionbut it's still around.

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 19:11:37 Sven Hartge wrote: > Is your system 32bit by chance? Then there will be now recent Google > Chrome, as Google discontinued the support for 32bit architectures. You can't get 64 bit for Wheezy either. Lisi

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

e to install my previous working (though > outdated) google-chrome-stable but I can not find a copy of the most > recently installed version. Does anyone know where this might be > found? Is your system 32bit by chance? Then there will be now recent Google Chrome, as Google discontinu

google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

outdated) google-chrome-stable but I can not find a copy of the most recently installed version. Does anyone know where this might be found? Thanks, Mike -- Mike McGinn KD2CNU President, UU Congregation at Rock Tavern * www.uucrt.org The problem with quotes on the internet is that it is

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 16:39:33 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:41 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > The site in question says that it wants Flashplayer 11 but will not > > "speak" to  > > my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox.   > > If I go to that site without scripts, it claims to need

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 17:46:52 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-06, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >> my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox. > > > > If I go to that site without scripts, it claims to need at least > > version 13: > > Asks me for version 11 ("This content requires the Adobe Flash Player > 11 or abo

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On 2016-05-06, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >> my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox. > > If I go to that site without scripts, it claims to need at least > version 13: > Asks me for version 11 ("This content requires the Adobe Flash Player 11 or above"). *She* should definitely update to 11.2.202.616

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:41 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > The site in question says that it wants Flashplayer 11 but will not > "speak" to  > my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox.   If I go to that site without scripts, it claims to need at least version 13:  "Either scripts and active content ar

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --install > as described here? > <https://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer/Installing#Debian_7_.22Wheezy.22 >> Yes. :-( Both before and after installing Google Chrome. Lisi

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

Lisi Reisz, Fr 06 Mai 2016 13:41:50 CEST: > I cannot get Pepperflashplugin installed on my clients computer. I have > aptitude installed it, but Chromium remains obstinately falshplayer free. You did update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --install as described here?

Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

obe Flash Player - Version: 21.0.0.216 and Shockwave Flash 21.0 r0 (which is what I have got on my desktop in Chromium - but I previously had Google Chrome). I have pepperflashplugin-nonfree Version: 1.4~bpo60+1 installed on my desktop. I cannot get Pepperflashplugin installed on my clients compute

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:49:26AM -0400, Kenneth Jacker wrote: > Follow-up question: when "installing the packages that are needed", from > where are they obtained? > > >From the same directory as that containing the ".deb" file, from an > Internet archive or from my local /var/cache/apt/archive

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

Apr 25, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Kenneth Jacker wrote: > Next time try "sudo gdebi google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb". >> It should install the packages needed if they are available. >> > > ​OK, thanks for the "tip"! > > -Kenneth​ > >

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

> > Next time try "sudo gdebi google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb". > It should install the packages needed if they are available. > ​OK, thanks for the "tip"! -Kenneth​

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

On 21 April 2016 at 23:45, Kenneth Jacker wrote: > > ># dpkg -i google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb > > > Next time try "sudo gdebi google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb". It should install the packages needed if they are available.

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

Sorry to reply to myself. Hearing from no one for almost a week, I decided to "check around" again and see if I couldn't find some way to restore Google Chrome ... This posting gave me the idea to "downgrade" the application: http://goo.gl/I5chaZ Looking in m

  1   2   3   4   >