begin Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) quotation (Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at
07:13:55PM -0400):
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:28:38PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > If the person had enough experience (to be completely distinguished from
> > intelligence, these are totally different aspects [1]) t
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:28:38PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> If the person had enough experience (to be completely distinguished from
> intelligence, these are totally different aspects [1]) to know what to post,
> they would have done so in the first place. As he or she did not, I'm
>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:23:54AM -0400, Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:27:04AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Better more data than less, particularly if I ask for it. I've been
> > getting mightily peeved lately by people who post "how do I solve foo
Chris Gray writes:
> So instead of just saying "post output of ", say "if
> returns foo then do bar, if it returns baz then do quux,
> otherwise post it and let me have a look at it."
I've tried that. More often than not the person asking for help gets lost,
fails to perform all the steps, and p
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 04:35:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:23:54AM -0400, Chris Gray wrote:
>
> > When you say "post output of ", you probably have some
> > idea what's going on but want confirmation (otherwise, you'd just be
> > adding noise).
>
> Often that's not
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:23:54AM -0400, Chris Gray wrote:
> When you say "post output of ", you probably have some
> idea what's going on but want confirmation (otherwise, you'd just be
> adding noise).
Often that's not the case - people frequently ask questions but don't
provide nearly enoug
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:27:04AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Better more data than less, particularly if I ask for it. I've been
> getting mightily peeved lately by people who post "how do I solve foo"
> to which I reply "post output of "...which never happens.
> I'm going to start kill
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:03:55AM +0200, Frederik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > Which gpg do you have installed? Post output of:
> >
> > $ gpg --version
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.3
> Copyright (C) 2000 Free
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Which gpg do you have installed? Post output of:
>
> $ gpg --version
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.3
Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:00:40AM +, Pollywog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On 19-Oct-2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > Which gpg do you have installed? Post output of:
> >
> > $ gpg --version
> > $ dpkg -s gnupg
> > $ dpkg -s gpg-rsa
>
> I upgraded gnupg yesterday and
On 19-Oct-2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> Which gpg do you have installed? Post output of:
>
> $ gpg --version
> $ dpkg -s gnupg
> $ dpkg -s gpg-rsa
I upgraded gnupg yesterday and gpg-rsa was removed in the process (Woody).
--
Andrew
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Frederik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a strange problem with GnuPG: I can install it correctly without any
> errors, but when i run gpg, i get the following error:
> gpg: /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa: error loading
> extension: /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa: canno
Hi,
I've a strange problem with GnuPG: I can install it correctly without any
errors, but when i run gpg, i get the following error:
gpg: /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa: error loading
extension: /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
gpg: selected cipher algorithm is inv
13 matches
Mail list logo
