e key being signed, I got the error:
gpg: signing failed: Invalid length
gpg: signing failed: Invalid length
Starting gnupg with --verbose doesn't give more useful output, so I skipped
it.
The full command is `gpg --local-user --edit-key `. In
edit key interface, I selected the first U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
> On 24/6/19 12:14 am, The Wanderer wrote:
>> The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a
>> lot of irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg
>> configuration - but I don't want to do a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 24/6/19 12:14 am, The Wanderer wrote:
> The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a
> lot of irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg
> configuration - but I don't want to do anything whic
On 2019-06-23 at 13:32, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> The Wanderer [2019-06-23 11:46:34-04:00] wrote:
>
>> On 2019-06-23 at 11:23, Teemu Likonen wrote:
>>> If you add line "auto-key-retrieve" to your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
>>> then GnuPG will automatically try to re
The Wanderer [2019-06-23 11:46:34-04:00] wrote:
> On 2019-06-23 at 11:23, Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> If you add line "auto-key-retrieve" to your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf then
>> GnuPG will automatically try to retrieve keys from keyservers when
>> you verify a signatur
necessary public key.
>
> If you add line "auto-key-retrieve" to your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf then
> GnuPG will automatically try to retrieve keys from keyservers when
> you verify a signature made by an unknown key. This may solve the
> problem of importing too much k
The Wanderer [2019-06-23 10:14:19-04:00] wrote:
> Some years ago, I got tired of manually importing the key every time I
> saw a signed message through the Debian mailing lists for which I didn't
> already have the necessary public key.
If you add line "auto-key-retriev
The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a lot of
irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg configuration -
but I don't want to do anything which risks losing my private key(s), or
any related information.
Just in case I'm wrong about that solution,
Hi!
I'm running debian testing and I'm trying to use mailvelope with Firefox
in order to encrypt/sign my emails. I plan to use it with my yubikey.
I'm getting "GnuPG is not available". Any ideas how to solve it?
One solution i could try is downloading the packages f
On 2018-10-02 17:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
You have the revocation key, don't you?
somewhere safe hopefully
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:11:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-09-30 18:39, deloptes wrote:
>
> >Here is something I do not get - to encrypt I am asked for password - I
> >guess it is for my secret key, no?
>
> with the mail GPG plugin I never use but tested between 2 email
> identities.
>
On 2018-09-30 18:39, deloptes wrote:
Here is something I do not get - to encrypt I am asked for password - I
guess it is for my secret key, no?
with the mail GPG plugin I never use but tested between 2 email
identities.
you can choose to generate a passphrase when you first make key pair
to
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Encryption requires recipient's public [E] key only. It seems that, in
> addition to encrypting, you are also signing the message. For that you
> need a secret (sub)key that has signing capability [S].
Thank you! It is exactly how it is.
delop...@gmail.com [2018-09-30 19:39:03+02] wrote:
> Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> No. To encrypt you need recipients' public keys which have an encryption
>> capability [E]. Usually there is an encryption subkey. To decrypt you
>> need the secret key which is associated with the public [E] key that was
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> delop...@gmail.com [2018-09-30 01:09:05+02] wrote:
>
>> A key is associated with identity -> the email. With the sub keys you
>> can add more identities.
>
> No. OpenPGP key's user id's (name, comment, email) are with the public
> master key, not with subkeys.
>
OK, sorr
delop...@gmail.com [2018-09-30 01:09:05+02] wrote:
> A key is associated with identity -> the email. With the sub keys you
> can add more identities.
No. OpenPGP key's user id's (name, comment, email) are with the public
master key, not with subkeys.
> Still to encrypt you need the private key.
o the article on subkeys,
>> as I consider that to be the only sensible way to have signing
>> capabilities on multitple devices related to a single GnuPG
>> key. Perhaps I misread your email in that regard.
>
>
> You read my email correctly. I did quickly read and h
nsible way to have signing
> capabilities on multitple devices related to a single GnuPG
> key. Perhaps I misread your email in that regard.
You read my email correctly. I did quickly read and have bookmarked
your link. Thank you for that.
-Jim P.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 09:37:43AM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> I get the secret key part. Are you saying to forget about syncing
> public keys (from other's emails) and just let each client download
> those from a public keyserver? If so, I may be over thinking the nee
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 09:16 +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> > Copying .gnupg is simple and easy, but not quite what I'm looking
> > for. Imagine having to copy your email folders or address book from
> > system to system, instead of using some
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Copying .gnupg is simple and easy, but not quite what I'm looking for.
> Imagine having to copy your email folders or address book from system to
> system, instead of using something like IMAP. I suppose I could build
> something that uses WebDav to syn
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 01:45 +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > You may find this article helpful:
> >
> > http://www.connexer.com/articles/openpgp-subkeys
>
> I think that a copy of .gnupg directory would mostly work.
> If OP wants to be
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> You may find this article helpful:
>
> http://www.connexer.com/articles/openpgp-subkeys
I think that a copy of .gnupg directory would mostly work.
If OP wants to be able to sign or encrypt with same key from more machines,
I agree the link is us
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:33:44AM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What is the best way to maintain consistency of a user's gnupg
> signing/verifying capabilities between 2 or more desktop systems?
>
You may find this article helpful:
http://www.connexer.com/arti
Hello!
What is the best way to maintain consistency of a user's gnupg
signing/verifying capabilities between 2 or more desktop systems?
tia,
-Jim P.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
does gnupg-debian_team provide a gui ?
i am lost with this new debian-app named codecrypt:
where is the audit of codecrypt ?
is a gnupgp implementation planned ?
do you know a gui for use it more user-friendly ?
Thank you for your information.
On 2013-10-09 at 22:26 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> I have a built-in smartcard reader on my laptop:
>
> Bus 002 Device 004: ID 0a5c:5800 Broadcom Corp. BCM5880 Secure
> Applications Processor
>
> And then I have a USB SCM331 reader I got while on a government
2013 21:28, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
# I'm not on this list. Please add CC to me for your reply.
Recently, I read discussion about use of OpenPGP cards by Debian
people (for Debian development). It would be off-topic there, I am
writing here.
Since 2010, for GnuPG development, I have been trying
# I'm not on this list. Please add CC to me for your reply.
Recently, I read discussion about use of OpenPGP cards by Debian
people (for Debian development). It would be off-topic there, I am
writing here.
Since 2010, for GnuPG development, I have been trying to improve the
support of
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:27:47PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote:
> I have a laptop and a desktop. Both have squeeze, the latest versions
> of icedove (10.0.12-1) and enigmail (2:1.4.1-2) from squeeze-backports
> and gnupg (1.4.10-4+squeeze1) from squeeze installed.
>
> On the laptop
Hi Ken,
Ken Heard writes:
> On the laptop I can digitally sign my e-mails, but I cannot on the
> desktop. The laptop can find the gnupg key list (~/.pubring.gpg?),
> but the desktop cannot. (In both computers I can see the key list,
> including my key, by clicking on the lock
I have a laptop and a desktop. Both have squeeze, the latest versions
of icedove (10.0.12-1) and enigmail (2:1.4.1-2) from squeeze-backports
and gnupg (1.4.10-4+squeeze1) from squeeze installed.
On the laptop I can digitally sign my e-mails, but I cannot on the
desktop. The laptop can find the
hello,
it seems like none of the better open source webmail interfaces supports
gnupg. in particular i like atmail open (www.atmail.org) and roundcube
(www.roundcube.net) both have a very nice design.
unfortunately only the atmail commercial version has gnupg support, and
roundcube is missing
M- V- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t 5 X R tv-- b+++ DI D G e* h! !r y?
- --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkoGzcUACgkQ1kZz3mRu0GqnnwCfflIH8jeOsm0pvoI5ccDPVCXD
x1oA
Hi Harry,
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 11:14:14AM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a way, perhaps using /etc/aliases, so
> that all incoming mail addressed to my username (hrickards) is encrypted
> with *my* public key, so that when I read it only I can read it using
> *
On 9 May 2009, at 20:03, Dave Patterson wrote:
* Dave Patterson [2009-05-10 01:34:46 +0700]:
Curious, why are you trying to do the thing with postfix? Seems
like an
overly complicated parent for the script.
Postfix won't write the thing to disk either. You can configure
postfix
to u
tv-- b+++ DI D G e* h! !r y?
- --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkoF5G8ACgkQ1kZz3mRu0GoIYgCg5jGdLlUc6mcEn8gIr1zd64Tb
8ssAn1s99jBbA81VdYZz9D5ODvNx1YnW
=Hb/k
* Dave Patterson [2009-05-10 01:34:46 +0700]:
> Curious, why are you trying to do the thing with postfix? Seems like an
> overly complicated parent for the script.
Postfix won't write the thing to disk either. You can configure postfix
to use procmail for delivery, and procmail will push the
* Harry Rickards [2009-05-09 18:24:37 +0100]:
> When piping stuff to it from the command line it works fine, but when
> sending a test email to gpm...@l33tmyst.com I get a blank email in
> response. I think this is because /usr/bin/gpmail is being executed as
> the 'nobody' user (I setup a whoa
nk emails when sending mail to
>> gpm...@l33tmyst.com. I suppose it could be that I'm sending it to the
>> address it's meant to forward it to, could someone send an email to
>> gpm...@l33tmyst.com for me? Thanks.
>
> Here you go. I just found the thread, lo
ks fine,
but I still receive blank emails when sending mail to
gpm...@l33tmyst.com. I suppose it could be that I'm sending it to the
address it's meant to forward it to, could someone send an email to
gpm...@l33tmyst.com for me? Thanks.
- --
Many thanks
Harry Rickards (a.k.
setup the GPG keys
for the 'mail' user. nobody can't use GPG, as it doesn't have a home
directory, so is there a way to change the user that Postfix pipes
things to with (to mail or any other user with a home directory)? Thanks
for all the help.
- --
Many thanks
Harry Rickar
command.
>
> Trick is to not write to disk prior to encryption.
>
Uh, huh. Thanks for the tips, I'll try to come up with something from that.
- --
Many thanks
Harry Rickards (a.k.a l33tmyst)
- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GAT/GCM/GCS/GCC/GIT/GM d? s: a? C UL+++
* Harry Rickards [2009-05-09 11:14:14 +0100]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a way, perhaps using /etc/aliases, so
> that all incoming mail addressed to my username (hrickards) is encrypted
> with *my* public key, so that when I read it on
+ UL P- L+++ E--- W+++ N o K+
w--- O- M- V- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t 5 X R tv-- b+++ DI D G e* h! !r y?
- --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkoFV3YACgkQ
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:33:26 + (UTC)
Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've thought a lot about security lately and one of the "items" on my
> list is signing and encrypting my mail using gnupg. Now how is this
> done? I a
Hey guys,
I've thought a lot about security lately and one of the "items" on my list is
signing and encrypting my mail using gnupg. Now how is this done? I am currently
using the sylpheed 2.4.5 client compiled with gnupg support. If I choose to sign
and encrypt messages, I am n
I figured it out at last:) This was because gpgv package. When I installed
it - I was able to upgrade this gnupg at last:)
-Original Message-
From: Florian Kulzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 8:22 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnupg on etch
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 19:55:21 +0200, Debeselis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed one strange thing:
>
> goblinas:/etc/init.d# apt-show-versions -u
> gnupg/etch upgradeable from 1.4.5-1 to 1.4.5-2
>
> goblinas:/etc/init.d# aptitude upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
Hi,
I noticed one strange thing:
goblinas:/etc/init.d# apt-show-versions -u
gnupg/etch upgradeable from 1.4.5-1 to 1.4.5-2
goblinas:/etc/init.d# aptitude upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:32:20PM +0100, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 20:57 +, Olafur Jens Sigurdsson wrote:
> > Þann 2006-10-09, 20:03:31 (+0100) skrifaði michael:
> > > I get a similar error to the OP... any ideas?
> > > Get:4 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages [87.
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 20:57 +, Olafur Jens Sigurdsson wrote:
> Þann 2006-10-09, 20:03:31 (+0100) skrifaði michael:
> > I get a similar error to the OP... any ideas?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update
> > Password:
> > Get:1 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [189B]
> >
On 2006-10-09, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get a similar error to the OP... any ideas?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update
> Password:
> Get:1 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [189B]
> Get:2 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release [79.6kB]
> Ign ftp://ftp.uk.debian.
x Counter, http://counter.li.org/
** and the man said **
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
michael wrote:
I get a similar error to the OP... any ideas?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update
Password:
Get:1 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [189B]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release [79.6kB]
Ign ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release
Get:3 ftp://ftp.uk.debian
Þann 2006-10-09, 20:03:31 (+0100) skrifaði michael:
> I get a similar error to the OP... any ideas?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update
> Password:
> Get:1 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [189B]
> Get:2 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release [79.6kB]
> Ign ftp://ftp.uk.debi
I get a similar error to the OP... any ideas?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update
Password:
Get:1 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [189B]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release [79.6kB]
Ign ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release
Get:3 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/mai
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 00:37, Bruno Buys wrote:
> 1F41B907
Actually you need the debian-keyring package installed then
gpg --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg --export --armour
1F41B907 | apt-key add -
To get Marillat's key into the secure apt keyring.
Stephen
--
GPG
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 00:37, Bruno Buys wrote:
> Anybody having problems with gnupg and apt-get saying 'no pubkey
> found...'? This is an etch install, apt-get complains not founding key
> even after I do a
>
> vmtesting:/home/bruno# gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.
Anybody having problems with gnupg and apt-get saying 'no pubkey
found...'? This is an etch install, apt-get complains not founding key
even after I do a
vmtesting:/home/bruno# gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv 4F368D5D
gpg: requesting key 4F368D5D from hkp server keyring.debi
Hello,
I need to check (from a script) E-Mail addresses whether there is a
GPG Key on a server or not. I have tried
gpg --homedir ${FETCHDIR} --batch --yes --quiet --search-keys ${EMAIL}
but this does not work, since I need to enter a number... Is there
a possibility to get the whole GPG key
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 22:08, David Scott Coburn wrote:
>
> This is a bit bizarre.
Well, it seems to be working now.
I have no clue what the trouble was. Either pilot error, or
some problem that took a few reboots to cure.
Thanks for the help.
Scott
--
: David Scott Coburn
: "Assume a s
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
You could try replacing your ~/.gnupg with a backup in case something
really unexplainable happened to it.
Besides the funny characters theory and the "unexplainable" I have no
idea what could have happened.
jorge
--
To
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 04:41, Jon Dowland wrote:
>
> That's the only think occurring to me - try entering your passphrase at
> a terminal prompt (rather than the GPG passphrase prompt) -- do you see
> what you expect, or are some characters incorrect?
I tried with a console login (rather than
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:42:09PM -0500, David Scott Coburn wrote:
> I am running Debian Etch on my computer. After doing a dist-upgrade
> last night gnupg stopped accepting my passphrases.
> It seems that perhaps it is a keyboard/encoding/locale problem of some
> sort?
That'
Hello,
I am running Debian Etch on my computer. After doing a dist-upgrade
last night gnupg stopped accepting my passphrases.
It looks as though gnupg was not updated.
I also run Etch on my computer at work, and it did not have this problem
after doing the dist-upgrade.
I am running custom
place that
> message doesn't appear. I know, I could edit those keys all over again
> and assign trust values, but I was hoping to avoid that.
I finally found it. In addition to doing the normal gpg --export and
gpg --export-secret-keys I needed to do a --export-ownertrust. Then I
could wip
emember for sure), when the old trustdb is in place that
message doesn't appear. I know, I could edit those keys all over again
and assign trust values, but I was hoping to avoid that.
Thanks,
Jacob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDyp0CkpJ43hY3cTURAs
Jacob writes:
> So, I figure there must be some way to 'upgrade' the trustdb so that I
> can fetch new keys without corrupting the trustdb, but I don't know what
> it is. Anyone have any advice on a good way to fix this?
I'd try deleting the trustdb and letting gpg rebuild it.
--
John Hasler
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so I created this problem for myself. But now I can't figure out
how to fix it.
The problem comes because I simply dropped a .gnupg directory along
with it's pubring, secring and trustdb into my ~/ directory so that I
could use m
I wish to post the text
into the wiki using encrypted form. For this I wish to use GnuPG to
create a 2 key pair, and offering the appropriate key to my users that
should be able to read the protected data.
I'm not so fluent into cryptography, so basically my question comes to this:
1. Is it p
Hello guys,
I am facing a problem with gnupg, that It doesn't detect my private keys
after partition resizing.
So when I run the kgpg, my public keys are present but no private keys (i.e.
I can't sign any message).At the same time the file "secring.gpg" is 5.6kb
which
Adam Funk wrote:
> I compiled GnuPG myself and installed it in /usr/local/. To satisfy
> dependencies I created the following control file
>
> Package: gnupg-af
> Provides: gnupg
> Conflicts: gnupg
> Description: GnuPG compiled by AF.
> GnuPG compiled by AF
>
&g
Hello
Adam Funk (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I compiled GnuPG myself and installed it in /usr/local/. To satisfy
> dependencies I created the following control file
>
> Package: gnupg-af
> Provides: gnupg
> Conflicts: gnupg
> Description: GnuPG compiled by AF.
>
I compiled GnuPG myself and installed it in /usr/local/. To satisfy
dependencies I created the following control file
Package: gnupg-af
Provides: gnupg
Conflicts: gnupg
Description: GnuPG compiled by AF.
GnuPG compiled by AF
and made a package file and installed it. A few days ago, while I
On Monday 16 August 2004 12:06, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote:
> The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file
> (/home/lance/.gnupg/gpg.conf). However, the agent doesn't seem to run.
> This could result in problems with signing/decryption. Please disable
>
Hello
Lance W. Haverkamp (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> If I turn on the agent in kgpg I keep getting the following error at
> launch, and the agent does not work:
>
> The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file
> (/home/lance/.gnupg/gpg.conf).
&g
If I turn on the agent in kgpg I keep getting the following error at launch,
and the agent does not work:
The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file
(/home/lance/.gnupg/gpg.conf).
However, the agent doesn't seem to run. This could result in problems with
signing/
On Sunday 13 June 2004 15:30, William Ballard wrote:
> Assuming I have a good sized key with a really, really good
> passphrase, how easy will it be to crack GnuPG encryption if the
> cracker has access to the Private Key?
My understanding is that the private keyring file contains the
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:08:28AM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> other private key. Then as soon as you've read it on your PocketPC,
> delete it and store a copy at home. Any time you encrypt something
The goal is to keep some semi-sensitive data (account #s with the power
company, cable compan
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:23:49AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> Assuming I have a good sized key with a really, really good passphrase,
> how easy will it be to crack GnuPG encryption if the cracker has access
> to the Private Key?
>
> [Believe it or not, I have a port of GnuPG
Assuming I have a good sized key with a really, really good passphrase,
how easy will it be to crack GnuPG encryption if the cracker has access
to the Private Key?
[Believe it or not, I have a port of GnuPG that runs as a command line
app on a PocketPC. Right now I can't think of a conve
Hi,
my email address is going to change so i wanted to update the one
used in my gpg key.
1) I add a new uid with the correct email address, removed the other uid
with deluid and then i sent back the key to a keyserver.
I'm not sure that it's the correct way and i've been told to use revuid
for t
Ciao a tutti,
volevo sapere se chiunque può pubblicare la sua chiave GnuPG sul
keyring di Debian o se è riservato ai soli sviluppatori.
Grazie,
Marco Bresciani
--
(o_ Linux Registered User #343609 (http://counter.li.org)
//\
V_/_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
LeVA wrote:
[snip]
> And when I Save the attached signature, and run cat signature.asc |
> gpg --import, I get this messages:
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
If those files are really data signatures, then this is to be expected.
Do you mean keys or key signa
Incoming from LeVA:
>
> I have installed KMail a few days ago, and with it I've installed the
> GnuPG program too. But some of the signatures can not be read by gpg.
There's a discussion going on in debian-security on this. Suffice to
say, some mailers use deprecated/obso
Hello!
I have installed KMail a few days ago, and with it I've installed the
GnuPG program too. But some of the signatures can not be read by gpg.
There are some messages, which has a signature.asc attached, but KMail
writes this in the messages window:
"The message is signed, but th
Are there any experimental gnupg-1.9 packages available?
Please cc me in your reply.
Thanks,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:45:01 +0200
daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abdul Latip wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since I have less clue on keeping the pace of SARGE,
> > I have down-graded back to WOODY.
> >
> > The problem is that the GNUPG keys made by
Abdul Latip wrote:
Hi,
Since I have less clue on keeping the pace of SARGE,
I have down-graded back to WOODY.
The problem is that the GNUPG keys made by version
1.2.0 can not be read by version 1.0.6.
May I know, if there is a quick and dirty way to
convert?
regards,
I am in the same situation
Hi,
Since I have less clue on keeping the pace of SARGE,
I have down-graded back to WOODY.
The problem is that the GNUPG keys made by version
1.2.0 can not be read by version 1.0.6.
May I know, if there is a quick and dirty way to
convert?
regards,
--
Abdul Latip -- Junior Staff -- Angkasa
gt;
> But, it seems like the self-signature is created!
>
> $ gpg --edit-key 1542E793
> gpg (GnuPG) 1.2.3; Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
> This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
> un
d with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 392B ECD0 6AA2 5FF3 98F4 830F 1031 EEDA 1542
E793
But, it seems like the self-signature is created!
$ gpg --edit-key 1542E793
gpg (GnuPG) 1.2.3; Copyright (C) 2003 Free Sof
s
mean "-r KEYID" is not functional or there is a bug in the output
message? Is there another way to check which subkey is used for
encryption of an encrypted file?
Thanks in advance.
Qian
PS: I am using woody with gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:55:55AM -0600, Nathan Malmberg wrote:
> > Yep. Even worse: the undeath is probably viral. Those disks may very well
> > taint any drive they touch, which will likely infect any disks that are put
> > in it...
> >
> > No, I'm not kidding.
>
> You may not be kidding, bu
inimized.
--
"Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the
life; he that believeth in me, though he were dead,
yet shall he live." John 11:25
Nathan J. Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GNUPG ID: 8A9B426E
The attachment is a digital signature. Get my key at wwwkeys.pgp.net.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
At 2003-06-17T15:14:57Z, Nathan Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's my plan as soon as I can afford to spend $20 on anything, which
> will probably be after I graduate.
You're a college student and haven't discovered the lure of selling plasma?
For shame, for shame.
> So I've heard. I
like undead, killing every disk it touches.
Nate
--
"Many are the afflictions of the righteous; but the
LORD delivereth him out of them all."
Psalms 34:19
Nathan J. Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GNUPG ID: 8A9B426E
The attachment is a digital signature. Get my key at wwwkeys.pgp.net.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
At 2003-06-16T17:12:12Z, Nathan Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With as many problems as I have had, I have been trying to brainstorm
> alternatives. One thought I had was to write the files to which I need
> only read access to removeable media, and keep the rest in my home
> directory.
Knowledgeable Debian Users,
As a part of developing security-conscious habits, I have kept
my .gnupg directory on removeable media (first a floppy, then a zip
disk). Recently, however, I have found that when I mount my
ext2-formatted zip disk, the disk quickly becomes unreadable (it led
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
