Hellow Ash!
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 11:14 +1300, Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 2024-02-19 08:57, Ash Joubert wrote:
> > I removed /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf (as root) and ran
> > "fc-cache -f" (as user). I still have a few missing emojis in
> > xfce4-terminal (flags and combined emojis) but ge
On 2024-02-19 08:57, Ash Joubert wrote:
I removed /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf (as root) and ran
"fc-cache -f" (as user). I still have a few missing emojis in
xfce4-terminal (flags and combined emojis) but geany is fixed.
Working test-emoji screenshot attached (xfce4-terminal on sid). 😊
On 2024-02-19 07:08, Ash Joubert wrote:
On 2024-02-18 23:33, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 16:23 +0900, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
I am also on sid and
On 2024-02-18 23:33, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 16:23 +0900, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
Hellow,
I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
(...)
Just now, i did clean-up with screenshots [1],[2
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 16:23 +0900, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
> Hellow,
>
> I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
> via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
>
> (...)
Just now, i did clean-up with screenshots [1],[2],[3].
[1]
Hellow,
I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
Here related screenshot[1]:
https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/stuff/-/raw/8bec2cc5d8b9d74438c17b8c202d753b15c09ab6/test-emoji.png
Really i would like to solve
Hello
Has anyone else noticed in Gnome Terminal in bullseye that, by default,
it starts in an 80x24 configuration, but if you press F11 to make it
full screen and then press F11 again to take it back to non-full-screen,
the configuration it goes back to isn't quite 80x24? It's approx
hello,
In my new Buster installation, when I switch to the Gnome Terminal and
quickly want to write a command, the terminal lags and then beeps (the
bell that sounds when you reach an interaction point), when it should
not be beeping (becuase I have not typed anything that would elicit a
bell
Vas Vas wrote:
> I recently upgraded to testing, and certain applications take an excessive
> amount of time to start. So far I've experienced it with firefox-esr,
> gnome-terminal, nautilus, and transmission-gtk, and it ranges from 20 to 90
> seconds of delay beyond what&
I recently upgraded to testing, and certain applications take an excessive
amount of time to start. So far I've experienced it with firefox-esr,
gnome-terminal, nautilus, and transmission-gtk, and it ranges from 20 to 90
seconds of delay beyond what's normal.
Once one of those ap
Ingraham wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >
>> >
>> > Also I just ran mutt in an X terminal instead by invoking xterm from
>> > Gnome-Terminal, and although the font is horrible and the window is too
>> > small,
On Fri 07 Oct 2016 at 21:47:37 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 08:52:41PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, you can tell xterm to use freetype fonts, e.g.,
> >
> > xterm -fa "Monospace 12"
> >
> > Alternatively, use the faceName resource in your ~/.Xresources fi
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 09:47:37PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Also I have no .Xresources file, is that normal?
wooledg@wooledg:~$ ls -a /etc/skel
. .. .bash_logout .bashrc .profile
Yup. Normal. But the good news is, it looks like you *can* make one
and expect it to be used by the Debian
Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:20:20AM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:00:33PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >> > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 03:28:41AM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
Am 24.09.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Fletcher:
> Not sure where I should be looking for the source of the problem.
> Keyboard is completely normal in other apps. (it is a Japanese keyboard,
> in a British English language environment, in case that matters. That is
> what I have been using all along)
6 at 11:00:33PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>> > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 03:28:41AM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > >
>
> Also I just ran mutt in an X terminal instead by invoking xterm from
> Gnome-Terminal, and alth
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:05:44AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Also I just ran mutt in an X terminal instead by invoking xterm from
> Gnome-Terminal, and although the font is horrible and the window is too
> small, it does NOT display the same psychotic intermittent scrolling
> b
; On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 03:28:41AM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
Also I just ran mutt in an X terminal instead by invoking xterm from
Gnome-Terminal, and although the font is horrible and the window is too
small, it does NOT display the same psycho
nnected and nothing at all
while I was observing the issue in Mutt in one Gnome terminal while
watching these logs in two others.
I have noticed since my first post that, if I wait long enough (at least
several seconds, sometimes almost a minute) the scrolling keystroke IS
eventually responded
> >
> >
> > Have you tried backing out of X to a console and observing the
> > behaviour there?
> >
>
> I hadn't, but I just tried it now and, like all applications except
> Gnome terminal, it works perfectly, with no problems, exactly as I
> would
behaviour
> there?
>
I hadn't, but I just tried it now and, like all applications except
Gnome terminal, it works perfectly, with no problems, exactly as I would
expect.
Mark
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:00:33PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 03:28:41AM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >
> > I can't address the emulator's scrolling behavior in general, but in
> > specific to mutt, you can add:
> >
> > set pager_stop = yes
> >
> > to your .muttrc an
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 03:28:41AM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>
> I can't address the emulator's scrolling behavior in general, but in
> specific to mutt, you can add:
>
> set pager_stop = yes
>
> to your .muttrc and that will stop the automatic flip to the next
> message. A nice work-a-round
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 05:02:36PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Recently, Gnome terminal's scrolling behaviour has gone strange. If I am
> looking at a man page, or scrolling through a long text file with less
> etc, or even just scrolling back through terminal history using
> Shift-PgUp and Shift
Has anyone else noticed strange behaviour around scrolling in Gnome
Terminal starting (fairly) recently in Jessie?
I am using a long-standing Jessie install which is by no means a new
install, but started life I think as etch and has been upgraded
repeatedly. I use, as I assume is obvious, Gnome
* On 2016 08 Jan 14:13 -0600, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> Another option might be the last answer here:
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/201900/run-true-multiple-process-instances-of-gnome-terminal
Kind of a kludge but that did start a terminal session on the :0.1
screen so I can use
> difference.
>
> After an update this morning with a kernel security update I tried it
> again after the reboot and still the same result.
Another option might be the last answer here:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/201900/run-true-multiple-process-instances-of-gnome-terminal
--
Che
* On 2016 08 Jan 10:48 -0600, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> Not sure what's going on.
>
> I tried by running an extra X server with Xephyr. No problem launching
> gnome-terminal there by using --display (with no other g-t-s running)
> or by launching gnome-terminal from an xte
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 05:36 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2016 08 Jan 05:14 -0600, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > How do you launch it?
>
> Either with an Xfce launcher from a panel or by typing 'gnome-
> terminal'
> at another terminal prompt.
>
> > AFA
* On 2016 08 Jan 05:14 -0600, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> How do you launch it?
Either with an Xfce launcher from a panel or by typing 'gnome-terminal'
at another terminal prompt.
> AFAICT gnome-terminal runs a single process, /usr/lib/gnome-
> terminal/gnome-terminal-server
s reasons I would like to use Gnome Terminal for an
> terminal
> application as it can be easily configured to disable its shortcut
> keys
> unlike Xfce Terminal. The problem is that I want to have GT open on
> the
> second screen--:0.1--but it opens on the first screen--:0.0--e
This is puzzling me. My Xorg is set up for dual-head operation with
each head having its own screen and four Xfce workspaces per screen.
It's something I've had working well for several years.
For various reasons I would like to use Gnome Terminal for an terminal
application as it can
My gnome-terminal (version 3.4.1.1)seems to be broken, but can't find how to
fix it. The main problem is I can't configure the profile. Normally this can
be done through clicking Edit > Profiles > Edit. Right now when I click Edit
in the Profiles dialogues, nothing happened
I looked at my post. I didn't like the words that I saw.
I do need to study Mate documentation
Please accept my appology.
Thanks for your help.
--
Paul E Condon
pecon...@mesanetworks.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 19:33 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> What is a shortcut in the context of Mate/Gnome?
> No errors are reported to me the user.
So how do you launch gnome-terminal? What happens when you open mate
-terminal and type "gnome-terminal"?
I don't use
On 20150624_1151+0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 14:38 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I'm running Jessie with Mate as desktop GUI. I notice that Mate
> > terminal, which I use a lot, is very similar in function to
> > Gnome-terminal. But Mate
On 24/06/15 10:51, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
Anyway, I thought the mate terminal was just a fork of the gnome one,
so if it can't repaint it's probably a bug.
Mate terminal is a fork of GNOME 2's gnome-terminal; the gnome-terminal
package in Debian jessie is GNOME *3*'s gnome
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
...
> Anyway, I thought the mate terminal was just a fork of the gnome one,
> so if it can't repaint it's probably a bug.
i used gnome-terminal some time ago while running Mate
and i don't recall there being any problem other than
having to set u
On 06/24/2015 09:08 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:38:17PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
I'm running Jessie with Mate as desktop GUI. I notice that Mate
terminal, which I use a lot, is very similar in function to
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 14:38 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm running Jessie with Mate as desktop GUI. I notice that Mate
> terminal, which I use a lot, is very similar in function to
> Gnome-terminal. But Mate terminal does not have the function of
> repainting the text in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:38:17PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm running Jessie with Mate as desktop GUI. I notice that Mate
> terminal, which I use a lot, is very similar in function to
> Gnome-terminal. But Mate terminal doe
I'm running Jessie with Mate as desktop GUI. I notice that Mate
terminal, which I use a lot, is very similar in function to
Gnome-terminal. But Mate terminal does not have the function of
repainting the text in a window when the window is resized. This is
available when I run gnome-terminal
Unimaginable! I reinstalled GNOME3, xorg, started from scratch, short of
reformatting the disk and NO.
In xterm,
$ gnome-terminal
Error constructing proxy for
org.gnome.Terminal:/org/gnome/Terminal/Factory0: Error calling
StartServiceByName for org.gnome.Terminal
Folks,
I upgraded to jessie a few moments ago and I cannot run gnome-terminal.
What's up?
I ran root-terminal and it broke my desktop completely. What's up?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 11:21 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2014 09:55:14 +0100
> Joe wrote:
>
>
> > Another possibility is that it is working fine, but with black text.
> > No, I'm not joking, I've seen this more than once. You could try
> > typing the name of an application you know
On Mon, 26 May 2014 09:55:14 +0100
Joe wrote:
> Another possibility is that it is working fine, but with black text.
> No, I'm not joking, I've seen this more than once. You could try
> typing the name of an application you know will run from the
> terminal. If that works, dig into the terminal
Thanks guys for the responses. It was black font on black background. So
I changed the color scheme, as some of you have told me to, and boom!
Problem gone.
-Muntasim Ul Haque
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Mon, 26 May 2014 09:35:02 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:56:47PM +0600, Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> > Hi,
> > GNOME-Terminal is blank in Awesome WM. It just opens but doesn't
> > show anything. Not even by use
Hi
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:56:47PM +0600, Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Hi,
> GNOME-Terminal is blank in Awesome WM. It just opens but doesn't
> show anything. Not even by username and hostname. Absolutely
> nothing. But Xfce terminal was working great. Even Terminator is
>
* Muntasim Ul Haque [2014-05-25 15:56 +0600]:
> Hi,
> GNOME-Terminal is blank in Awesome WM. It just opens but doesn't show
> anything. Not even by username and hostname. Absolutely nothing. But Xfce
> terminal was working great. Even Terminator is working properly. So what
Hi,
GNOME-Terminal is blank in Awesome WM. It just opens but doesn't show
anything. Not even by username and hostname. Absolutely nothing. But
Xfce terminal was working great. Even Terminator is working properly. So
what's wrong with GNOME-Terminal?
-Muntasim Ul Haque
--
To U
hi all.
gnome-terminal does not start with next error:
"error constructing proxy for org.gnome.terminal..."
sequence of command
# locale-gen
# localectl set-locale LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
#reboot.
doesnot help
locale is en_US.UTF-8
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Le 17.10.2013 19:02, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
Wheezy/XFCE4 does not highlight active tab in Gnome Terminal and it
is difficult to determine what tab is active.
Is there a solutions for this?
--
http://mr.flossdaily.org
Could it be a problem of theme? Have you a gtk2-engine installed
Wheezy/XFCE4 does not highlight active tab in Gnome Terminal and it is
difficult to determine what tab is active.
Is there a solutions for this?
--
http://mr.flossdaily.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On 9/19/13, Bob Proulx wrote:
> And if it doesn't help you then it still might help someone else so
> the investment is often useful multiple times. The rule is see one,
> do one, teach one. If you want to pay it back then help someone else
> out in the future.
*Rather* well said. Another way
Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> I have a gnome-terminal profile configured with a black background.
> However, running mutt in it changes the background to gray, a much
> lower contrast situation. In all the other terminals I have tried
> (xterm, rxvt, urxvt), black stays black in mutt. (
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:18:46AM -0400, Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> I have a gnome-terminal profile configured with a black background.
> However, running mutt in it changes the background to gray, a much
> lower contrast situation. In all the other terminals I have tried
> (x
On 9/19/13, Bob Proulx wrote:
> This behavior is why this is happening with both mutt and mc. Try
> less. Is it happening with less too? I think it should be.
Thank you for your encyclopedic response -- way above the call of duty!
I will try to get your suggested experiments. I'm sorry but
Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > This behavior is why this is happening with both mutt and mc. Try
> > less. Is it happening with less too? I think it should be.
>
> Thank you for your encyclopedic response -- way above the call of duty!
>
> I will try to get your suggested experi
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:18:46AM -0400, Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> I have a gnome-terminal profile configured with a black background.
> However, running mutt in it changes the background to gray, a much
> lower contrast situation. In all the other terminals I have tried
> (x
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 00:18 -0400, Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> I really like the tabbed windows setup. Are there any other terms out
> there that provide that feature?
xfce4-terminal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Eric d'Halibut:
>
> I have a gnome-terminal profile configured with a black background.
> However, running mutt in it changes the background to gray, a much
> lower contrast situation.
My guess is that the terminal's background color is independent of the
named colors that i
I have a gnome-terminal profile configured with a black background.
However, running mutt in it changes the background to gray, a much
lower contrast situation. In all the other terminals I have tried
(xterm, rxvt, urxvt), black stays black in mutt. (This
background-goes-gray also happens with
, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
>>
>> I see the same behavior on my system, but I'm using fluxbox. Normally I
>> just use xterm instead of gnome-terminal. But I just discovered that in
>> gnome-terminal I can get the colors back correctly like this:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> I see the same behavior on my system, but I'm using fluxbox. Normally I
> just use xterm instead of gnome-terminal. But I just discovered that in
> gnome-terminal I can get the colors back correctly like this:
>
> Ed
- Original Message -
> From: "Sebastian Canagaratna"
>
> Just two days ago (10th June 2013)I changed from the amd64 version to
> the
>
> 486 version mainly because the acrobat reader is not functional
>
> in the 64 but version. But now I find tha
Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
> But now I find that the gnome terminal does not function: the
> background is dark and perhaps the cursor is also dark, but I don't
> know as yet how to change the colors The x-terminal is functioning
> OK and everything else is OK.Has anyone
Just two days ago (10th June 2013)I changed from the amd64 version to the
486 version mainly because the acrobat reader is not functional
in the 64 but version. But now I find that the gnome terminal does
not function: the background is dark and perhaps the cursor is also dark,
but I don't
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:01:05AM +0200, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> double click seems to change the focus from the terminal to the tab. do
> you click or doble click the tab to change tabs?
Aha! I did not see that. Either double click or when the focus was on
one tab and the click is on anothe
When I "double click" on the tab I get that rectange and then the focus
remains in the tab rather than the command prompt. To remove it and
recover the normal behaviour I have to click over the terminal window
itself.
Yes. That is the behaviour I want to change.
double click seems to change th
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> If you want to avoid the problem altogether you can just use
> alt + 1 for tab 1
> alt + 2 for tab 2,
> etc...
> ctrl + shift + T for new tab
> ctrl + shift + W to close tab
Yes I use that regularly.
Thanks for your attention.
R
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 08:11:46PM +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:35:26 +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
>
> > When I left-click on a tab in gnome-terminal the focus is on the tab and
> > not in the terminal at the prompt. How can I change that behaviour to
> >
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:35:26 +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> When I left-click on a tab in gnome-terminal the focus is on the tab and
> not in the terminal at the prompt. How can I change that behaviour to
> take the focus to where the prompt is?
Can you see a dotted border around the tab
On 01/03/12 14:30, Johann Spies wrote:
what version are you running? im running testing and it seems the latest
version in debian
$ aptpolicy gnome-terminal
Where do you get aptpolicy?
apt-cache policy
also, i have all the versions of debian in my sources.list, so it
reveals all versions
>
> what version are you running? im running testing and it seems the latest
> version in debian
>
> $ aptpolicy gnome-terminal
Where do you get aptpolicy?
apt-file search aptpolicy
gets nothing.
So does:
wajig search apt | grep -i policy
and
dpkg -S aptpolicy
dpkg-query
is no problem when I use shortcuts (Shft-Ctrl-PgUp/PgDn). Then the
focus lands on the cursor position. It is only when I use the mouse.
>
> It's worth making sure that this hasn't changed/been fixed in the most
> up-to-date version of gnome-terminal, if you aren't r
On 01/03/12 08:35, Johann Spies wrote:
When I left-click on a tab in gnome-terminal the focus is on the tab and not
in the terminal at the prompt. How can I change that behaviour to take
the focus to where the prompt is?
Regards
Johann
what version are you running? im running testing and it
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:35:26AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> When I left-click on a tab in gnome-terminal the focus is on the tab and not
> in the terminal at the prompt. How can I change that behaviour to take
> the focus to where the prompt is?
I think that will require patching t
When I left-click on a tab in gnome-terminal the focus is on the tab and not
in the terminal at the prompt. How can I change that behaviour to take
the focus to where the prompt is?
Regards
Johann
--
Johann SpiesTelefoon: 021-808 4699
Databestuurder / Data manager
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:28:32 -0400, rir wrote:
> I am not finding the info to do this.
>
> I'd like to configure Gnome Terminal to:
>
> o- Pass the key through to the program being run.
I dunno if this is what you asked for or you need how to escape "F1" or
rir wrote:
> I'd like to configure Gnome Terminal to:
> o- Pass the key through to the program being run.
> o- Have the terminal launch in 25 lines x 80 columns
> o- Have the terminal launch in a custom size or zoom setting.
> I want to do this by some configuration sett
I am not finding the info to do this.
I'd like to configure Gnome Terminal to:
o- Pass the key through to the program being run.
o- Have the terminal launch in 25 lines x 80 columns
o- Have the terminal launch in a custom size or zoom setting.
I want to do this by some configur
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:05:26 +0800, Chris wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:38:41PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>> Chris writes:
>> > Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
>> >
>> > Now if I try to type any characters, I
By holding one key down all the time, all the other keys I type register
properly. For example, while holding the 'a' key down with one hand,
I can easily type 'xterm' with the other.
Then, of course, I can use xterm, which does not have this problem.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Josselin Mouette writes:
>> [Argh, even though I'm the original bug reporter for #631116, I didn't
>> get any of the email followups...]
>
> No, this is because of #434257. The debbugs developers don’t want to fix
Argh...
> As mentioned in the bug log, SCIM doesn’t provide a GTK3 module.
Hmm, s
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>
>> [Argh, even though I'm the original bug reporter for #631116, I didn't
>> get any of the email followups, so I didn't seem those replies until you
>> mentioned them! Some stupid spam filter crap no doubt... Spammers
>> ... must di
crap no doubt... Spammers
> ... must die]
No, this is because of #434257. The debbugs developers don’t want to fix
their software.
> So what exactly is gnome-terminal screwing up here...? Why does
> disabling SCIM solve it?
As mentioned in the bug log, SCIM doesn’t pr
s, so I didn't seem those replies until you
mentioned them! Some stupid spam filter crap no doubt... Spammers
... must die]
That solves it for me too:
env -u XMODIFIERS gnome-terminal &
... of course that means I can't use SCIM in gnome-terminal, ... not
such a big deal r
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:38:41PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Chris writes:
> > Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
> >
> > Now if I try to type any characters, I just get part of them typed
> > in. For example, if I type "ls&q
Mahesh T Pai writes:
>>> WHich version of libgnomekbd?
>>
> > 2.91.91-2
>
> I use 2.30.2-2
>
> Probably, that makes a difference.
Upgrading (and then rebooting) that doesn't make any difference.
Indeed, AFAICT, gnome-terminal doesn't seem use lib
Miles Bader writes:
>> WHich version of libgnomekbd?
>
> 2.91.91-2
I use 2.30.2-2
Probably, that makes a difference.
--
Mahesh T. Pai ||
L'homme est libre au moment qu'il veut l'etre.
* Man is free at the instant he wants to be.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
Mahesh T Pai writes:
> > somewhat different hardware (AMD + radeon + USB keyboard vs. Intel +
> > i915 + PS/2 keyboard -- I mention those details because it might be
> > related to X / input handling...).
>
> WHich version of libgnomekbd?
2.91.91-2
-miles
--
Religion, n. A daughter of Hope
Miles Bader writes:
> somewhat different hardware (AMD + radeon + USB keyboard vs. Intel +
> i915 + PS/2 keyboard -- I mention those details because it might be
> related to X / input handling...).
WHich version of libgnomekbd?
--
Mahesh T. Pai ||
That men do not learn much from the les
Mahesh T Pai writes:
> > I have this problem too:
>>
> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631116
>>
> > Very annoying (there are a lot of decent terminal programs in Debian,
> > but gnome-terminal is still the nicest I've found).
&g
Miles Bader writes:
> I have this problem too:
>
>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631116
>
> Very annoying (there are a lot of decent terminal programs in Debian,
> but gnome-terminal is still the nicest I've found).
I use same version - 3.0
Chris writes:
> Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
>
> Now if I try to type any characters, I just get part of them typed
> in. For example, if I type "ls", only "s" typed in. If I continuously
> type "asdf", onl
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:59:55PM +1000, Ben Darby wrote:
> * Chris (bbsh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
> >
> > Now if I try to type any characters, I just get part of them typed
> > in. For example, i
* Chris (bbsh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
>
> Now if I try to type any characters, I just get part of them typed
> in. For example, if I type "ls", only "s" typed in. If I continuously
> typ
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:38:25 +0800, Chris wrote:
> Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
Wow, are we already at there? I didn't notice :-O
> Now if I try to type any characters, I just get part of them typed in.
> For example, if I type "ls
Chris writes:
> Hi, I'm a user of gnome-terminal. Currently the version is 3.0.1-1.
>
> Now if I try to type any characters, I just get part of them typed
> in. For example, if I type "ls", only "s" typed in. If I continuously
> type "asdf",
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
