I can't set up /etc/hosts because I use laptop which plug in to dhcp network. I don't know exact ip/name. In the past, I can browse computer name from nautil but now it is impossible. I think the problem is relate to netbios but I don't where the problem happen (on debian or on window)
On พฤ.,
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:30:10 +0700
Surachai Locharoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed libgnomevfs2-extra. I can browse other machine using numeric
> ip (eg 192.168.1.3) but I can't browser smb by using computer name.
is the name/address set up properly in /etc/hosts?
you should have an
I installed libgnomevfs2-extra. I can browse other machine using numeric ip (eg 192.168.1.3) but I can't browser smb by using computer name.
Kan
On ศ., 2006-03-31 at 10:11 +1100, Mathias Teikari wrote:
I had the same problem after upgrading from sarge to etch. Installing
libgnomevfs2-extra f
I had the same problem after upgrading from sarge to etch. Installing
libgnomevfs2-extra fixes the problem. From a quick look at the package
respository it looks as if bzip2 and smb support was bundled with
libgnomevfs2-common in sarge.
Was there any notification of this difference when doing a di
Hi,Are you installed gnome-vfs and gnome-vfs-extra.MickaëlOn 2/28/06, Surachai Locharoen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I install debian testing. I unable to use nautilus to browse file in other machine via smb protocol. konqueror can browsable. How I to fix it?
--
Surachai Locharoen <[
I install debian testing. I unable to use nautilus to browse file in other machine via smb protocol. konqueror can browsable. How I to fix it?
--
Surachai Locharoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Agilesoft Coporation Company Limited
I had had this problem too
Take a look on packages that suggests/recommends pango and install them
В Вск, 26/02/2006 в 08:48 +0100, Joost Kraaijeveld пишет:
> Hi,
>
> When I open my Gnome Help files I get these strange chars: squares with
> numbers like 20 (on the first line) and 02, 03,15 etc (o
Hi James,
> The following website contains excellent instructions on which font sets
> to install in order to display these characters correctly:
>
> http://wiki.splitbrain.org/debianfonts
>
> Hope that helps
It did. After reading and comparing the installed fonts I installed the
package ttf-ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I open my Gnome Help files I get these strange chars: squares with
> numbers like 20 (on the first line) and 02, 03,15 etc (on the second
> line) in them. I assume that these are Unicode chars, not being
> displ
I too see this and was wondering the same thing.
-- Tony
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 08:48 +0100, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I open my Gnome Help files I get these strange chars: squares with
> numbers like 20 (on the first line) and 02, 03,15 etc (on the second
> line) in them. I assume
Hi,
When I open my Gnome Help files I get these strange chars: squares with
numbers like 20 (on the first line) and 02, 03,15 etc (on the second
line) in them. I assume that these are Unicode chars, not being
displayed properly.
How do I get those characters diplayed properly?
TIA
--
Groete
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get GNOME 2.12 into my Debian/testing. Some 49 packages are
> being held back, and upgrading results in unresolved dependencies.
> Example:
>
> # aptitude install gnome-media
>
> wants to automatically instal
On Thursday 15 December 2005 20:15, Marcel Stoop wrote:
[snip]
> There is a nice blog of one of the gnome-debian maintainers about the
> release of Gnome 2.12 and GTK 2.8 in unstable.
>
> http://oskuro.net/blog/freesoftware/gnome-2.12-unstable-2005-12-15-14-19
>
Thanks a lot f
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 22:07 +, Mark Crean wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:46, Marcel Stoop wrote:
> [snip]
> > gnome 2.12 isn't even in sid yet. So it will take at least a few months.
> >
>
> Is this because it's thought unreliable? I've been u
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 22:07 +, Mark Crean wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:46, Marcel Stoop wrote:
> [snip]
> > gnome 2.12 isn't even in sid yet. So it will take at least a few months.
> >
>
> Is this because it's thought unreliable? I've been u
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:46, Marcel Stoop wrote:
[snip]
> gnome 2.12 isn't even in sid yet. So it will take at least a few months.
>
Is this because it's thought unreliable? I've been using Gnome 2.12 on a
couple of other distros without problems so far.
:)
Fish
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 12:40 +0545, Paras pradhan wrote:
> hi all:
>
> Is there any way out where i can check when (tentative date ) the
> gnome 2.12 will move to etch?
>
>
> Thanks
> Paras,
>
gnome 2.12 isn't even in sid yet. So it will take at least
hi all:
Is there any way out where i can check when (tentative date ) the
gnome 2.12 will move to etch?
Thanks
Paras,
18 matches
Mail list logo
