On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:17:36PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote:
>
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive
> > license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in
> > main). I don't know about woody, but sa
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive
> license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in
> main). I don't know about woody, but sarge has 7.04.
It actually WAS gs-aladdin that I installed on my
potato sys
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The one in unstable is 7.05. I compiled it on my sarge system from the
> unstable source. BTW do you really mean woody? Potato is history
> ;-) Woody is now the stable distribution.
I really AM running potato (except for the fact that
I installed gs_aladdin from
04 (potato has 5.10, and
> woody has 6.50).
>
> How do I determine if there is a debian package for
> ghostscript 7.04 anywhere, and if so, how can I install
> it on my potato system? (I've already installed the
> woody version of ghostscript on my potato system).
>
>
I've been advised
> by Derek Noonburg that I need a newer version of
> ghostscript: version 7.04 (potato has 5.10, and
> woody has 6.50).
>
> How do I determine if there is a debian package for
> ghostscript 7.04 anywhere, and if so, how can I install
> it on my potato sys
o has 5.10, and
woody has 6.50).
How do I determine if there is a debian package for
ghostscript 7.04 anywhere, and if so, how can I install
it on my potato system? (I've already installed the
woody version of ghostscript on my potato system).
Mike Fontenot
[EMAIL PROT
6 matches
Mail list logo
