Re: Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001)

2000-05-31 Thread Thomas Hood
Re: Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001) The solution for me was to do this: ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 The "unable to bind port 16001" message is issued by the Debian version of esd. Strangely enough, the RedHat version (whose executable is four times larger!) worked. So

Re: Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001)

2000-05-02 Thread Almer. S. Tigelaar.
Hello, Arcady Genkin wrote: > > I wonder what that port 16001 thingy is. It seems that port 16001 is where ESounD is supposed to listen an wait for connections. Maybe some application wants to output sound at a certain point and tries to connect to port 16001, but ESounD isn't there.. For me p

Re: Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001)

2000-05-02 Thread Arcady Genkin
"Eric G . Miller" writes: > Think "gnome-wm" wants gnome-name-service, gnome-session running > first. I could be wrong. The docs are not as clear as they could > be ;) According to Gnome's docs, if one doesn't want session management, he can start gnome-wm instead of gnome-session. Honestly,

Re: Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001)

2000-05-02 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:05:42PM -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote: > I'm trying to configure a point-and-click Linux installation for a > friend of mine. I have been trying to get Gnome running, but to no > avail... > > >From gnome's docs it seems like all it takes is to put "exec gnome-wm" > into X i

RE: Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001)

2000-05-02 Thread Pollywog
I don't know the right way, but I just use "panel" as the command to start gnome. -- Andrew

Getting Gnome to run (unable to bind port 16001)

2000-05-02 Thread Arcady Genkin
I'm trying to configure a point-and-click Linux installation for a friend of mine. I have been trying to get Gnome running, but to no avail... >From gnome's docs it seems like all it takes is to put "exec gnome-wm" into X initialization file. I am using wdm, and suspect that it could be more diffi