Steve Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Internally consistent. If you look at the 6.x documentation they treat
> the whole thing as a stream operation, i.e. load an image, do this, do
> that, maybe load a second image and so something with that, composite
> the two images, load a third, resize i
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Craig M. Houck wrote:
Hey;
What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full
sized'
image?
I have tried many programs found using apt-cache search BUT either I
am to
stoopid to figure them out or they really don't do what I wan
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:55:41PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
Steve Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The options are most definitely NOT supposed to come before the input
file. This changed in version 6.x to make the ImageMagick syntax more
consistent.
Consistent with what? Not many tool
Steve Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The options are most definitely NOT supposed to come before the input
> file. This changed in version 6.x to make the ImageMagick syntax more
> consistent.
Consistent with what? Not many tools are expecting non-option
arguments before options (I can't th
Craig M. Houck wrote:
Hey;
What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full sized'
image?
I have tried many programs found using apt-cache search BUT either I am to
stoopid to figure them out or they really don't do what I want.
Fore xample:
convert image
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:22:50 -0500
"Craig M. Houck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey;
>
> What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full
> sized' image?
>
> I have tried many programs found using apt-cache search BUT either
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:03:26AM -0500, Michael Marsh wrote:
On 3/6/06, Steve Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The options are most definitely NOT supposed to come before the input
file. This changed in version 6.x to make the ImageMagick syntax more
consistent. The old behavior still works in
On 3/6/06, chouck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stii having problems ...
>
> convert -resize 10x10% DSCF0134.JPG DSCF0134.jpg
> convert: no decode delegate for this image format `DSCF0134.JPG'.
>
> cp DSCF0134.jpg dscf0134.jpg
> mogrify -scale 10x10% dscf0134.jpg
> mogrify: no decode delegate for th
On 3/6/06, Steve Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The options are most definitely NOT supposed to come before the input
> file. This changed in version 6.x to make the ImageMagick syntax more
> consistent. The old behavior still works in certain situations, but
> there are no guarantees.
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:37:30AM -0500, Michael Marsh wrote:
On 3/6/06, Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full sized'
image?
convert or mogrify is probably the easiest.
I have tried many programs found
6-03-06 at 10:37 -0500, Michael Marsh wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full sized'
> > image?
>
> convert or mogrify is probably the easiest.
>
> > I have tri
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:22:50AM -0500, Craig M. Houck wrote:
>Hey;
>
>What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full sized'
>image?
>
>I have tried many programs found using apt-cache search BUT either I am to
>stoopid to figure them out or t
On 3/6/06, Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full sized'
> image?
convert or mogrify is probably the easiest.
> I have tried many programs found using apt-cache search BUT either I am to
> stoopi
Hey;
What is any easy to use program to generate thumbnails from a 'full sized'
image?
I have tried many programs found using apt-cache search BUT either I am to
stoopid to figure them out or they really don't do what I want.
Fore xample:
convert image.JPG -resize 10% image
14 matches
Mail list logo
