Re: GPG on Linux kernel source

2001-05-09 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:28:33PM +0700, Oki DZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I tried to verify the source from www.linux.org, but I had the > following: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --verify linux-2.4.4.tar.bz2.sign linux-2.4.4.tar.bz2 > gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 28 08:48:08 2001

Re: GPG on Linux kernel source

2001-05-09 Thread Benjamin Black
> gpg: Good signature from "Linux Kernel Archives Verification Key > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" this means the signature matches the key. if you trust that the place you got the key from is secure and the key hasn't been compromised, then you can trust that the source is good. > Could not find a vali

Re: GPG on Linux kernel source

2001-05-09 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
Forgot to reply to the 2nd part of the mail, so here goes: On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:28:33PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I tried to verify the source from www.linux.org, but I had the > following: > > BTW, for verification of originality of the tarball, wouldn't it be > easier usin

Re: GPG on Linux kernel source

2001-05-09 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:28:33PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I tried to verify the source from www.linux.org, but I had the > following: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --verify linux-2.4.4.tar.bz2.sign linux-2.4.4.tar.bz2 > gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 28 08:48:08 2001 JAVT using DSA key

GPG on Linux kernel source

2001-05-09 Thread Oki DZ
Hi, Recently I tried to verify the source from www.linux.org, but I had the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --verify linux-2.4.4.tar.bz2.sign linux-2.4.4.tar.bz2 gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 28 08:48:08 2001 JAVT using DSA key ID 517D0F0E gpg: Good signature from "Linux Kernel Archives Verifica