Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-21 Thread John Halton
On 2/21/06, Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The biggest thing that seems to be holding up development has been the > realization by key members of the project that the Mach kernel has > fundamental flaws that do not support the long term goals of the Hurd. > There was some work done to

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-20 Thread Peter McAlpine
an be done) it's not very useful yet. It also likely wont be useful for quite a while. Debian GNU/Hurd and vanilla GNU/Hurd are two different things. The former uses Debian packages and the latter is usually a 'from-scratch' environment (I'm told most developers run vmwar

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-09 Thread John Halton
On 2/9/06, Gabriel Parrondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Hurd is an official part of the GNU project, it's not GNU/Hurd, but GNU. > I mean, if I use Windows with Linux (the kernel) it should be > Windows/Linux. But if I use just Windows it's just windows, not > &qu

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-08 Thread Gabriel Parrondo
debian wrote: On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote: GNU/Hurd. As Hurd is an official part of the GNU project, it's not GNU/Hurd, but GNU. I mean, if I use Windows with Linux (the kernel) it should be Windows/Linux. But if I use just Windows it's just wi

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-04 Thread Andreas Rippl
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:39:20PM +, debian wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote: > > > GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release." > > But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and &g

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-03 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:39:20PM +, debian wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote: > > GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release." > > But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and > love so

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-03 Thread debian
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote: > GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release." But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and love so well ? Joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: GNU Hurd

2006-02-03 Thread John Halton
On 03/02/06, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been reading up on the GNU Hurd OS. Unfortunately most articles are > several years old. I know Debian is actively assisting in the Hurd project. > My question is, will Etch be released officially on the Hurd, or is th

GNU Hurd

2006-02-03 Thread Joseph Smidt
I have been reading up on the GNU Hurd OS.  Unfortunately most articles are several years old.  I know Debian is actively assisting in the Hurd project.  My question is, will Etch be released officially on the Hurd, or is there any goals in the future for when Debian/Hurd will be officially

Re: GNU/HURD

2001-10-20 Thread Jerome Acks Jr
Isaac Aranda Nebot wrote: Por favor, ¿dónde podría encontrar información sobre el nuevo Kernel GNU/HURD? y ¿dónde podría bajármelo? Muchas gracias. http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd.html -- Jerome

Re: GNU/HURD

2001-10-20 Thread dman
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:52:37PM +0200, Isaac Aranda Nebot wrote: | Por favor, ¿dónde podría encontrar información sobre el nuevo Kernel | GNU/HURD? y ¿dónde podría bajármelo? Muchas gracias. Check out the 'debian-hurd' mailing list. Be aware though that the people on it may not kn

GNU/HURD

2001-10-20 Thread Isaac Aranda Nebot
Por favor, ¿dónde podría encontrar información sobre el nuevo Kernel GNU/HURD? y ¿dónde podría bajármelo? Muchas gracias.

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd?

2001-01-17 Thread Colin Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote: >> csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >From a tip given somewhere on this list, I typed: >> > >> ># apt-get dist-upgrade -s >> > >> >And lo and behold came the following output: >> [...] >> >Inst diff [shellutils on hurd] >> [...]

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd?

2001-01-17 Thread debuser
Actually, I think it's just a minor bug in apt-get. I see it too even though I'm not running hurd, it mentions hurd in brackets with the -s option. I've never worried about it, since it provides the need functionality - telling me what packages will be upgraded. On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Colin Watson w

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd?

2001-01-16 Thread Colin Watson
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From a tip given somewhere on this list, I typed: > ># apt-get dist-upgrade -s > >And lo and behold came the following output: [...] >Inst diff [shellutils on hurd] [...] >What does the "shellutils on hurd" mean? The shellutils package depends on 'login | hurd', sin

Debian GNU/Hurd?

2001-01-16 Thread csj
>From a tip given somewhere on this list, I typed: # apt-get dist-upgrade -s And lo and behold came the following output: Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... 6 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Inst diff [shellutils on hurd] Conf diff Inst le

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd ????

1998-04-14 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 06:24:32AM -0400, Alain Toussaint wrote: > > I know what you mean. I wait for Debian GNU/Hurd ;) > > Debian GNU/Hurd ? does there's plan for this in the Debian > organisation ??? No, just in my head ;) But I'm sure that there will be a Debian

Debian GNU/Hurd ????

1998-04-14 Thread Alain Toussaint
> I know what you mean. I wait for Debian GNU/Hurd ;) Debian GNU/Hurd ? does there's plan for this in the Debian organisation ??? Alain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]