Re: GNOME minor problems

1999-05-16 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "SB" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SB> My best guess is that imlib-gdk doesn't depend on imlib-base (and SB> all the gnome stuff depends only on imlib-gdk). This is not the case. dpkg -s gdk-imlib1 [...] Depends: imlib-base, libc6 (>= 2.1), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62,

Re: GNOME minor problems

1999-05-16 Thread Stuart Ballard
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > >> "SB" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SB> The only problem I had was a missing dependency somewhere that > SB> meant I was able to get the whole thing installed without ever > SB> installing (the right version of) imlib-base, so everything > SB> c

Re: GNOME minor problems

1999-05-16 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "SB" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SB> The only problem I had was a missing dependency somewhere that SB> meant I was able to get the whole thing installed without ever SB> installing (the right version of) imlib-base, so everything SB> core-dumped. As you can't be more specif

GNOME minor problems

1999-05-16 Thread Stuart Ballard
I recently managed to get GNOME from potato installed onto my hybrid slink/potato system (despite the dire warnings I've heard, I have had no problems from the conflicting glibc versions - apt seems to have dealt with it very well). The only problem I had was a missing dependency somewhere that me