Johann Spies wrote:
>
> After apt-get upgrade icewm and icewm-gnome I do no longer have 4
> workspaces and I get the following error message when I run startx
> (although X11 and gnome is working otherwise):
>
> Bad option: ShowXButton
> Bad option: WindowListFontName
> Bad option: AddWorkspace
>
On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Johann Spies wrote:
> After apt-get upgrade icewm and icewm-gnome I do no longer have 4
> workspaces and I get the following error message when I run startx
> (although X11 and gnome is working otherwise):
>
> Bad option: ShowXButton
> Bad option: WindowListFontName
> Bad opti
After apt-get upgrade icewm and icewm-gnome I do no longer have 4
workspaces and I get the following error message when I run startx
(although X11 and gnome is working otherwise):
Bad option: ShowXButton
Bad option: WindowListFontName
Bad option: AddWorkspace
Bad option: AddWorkspace
Bad option: A
[snip]
> The frontend is not done yet but the backend and APT dselect method are
> quite functional. Yes, you should install it. Get the latest version
> from potato(0.3.3) if you are running slink, it does not depened on
> glibc2.1 so it is safe to install manually
[take with a pinch of salt]
In a message dated 4/2/99 1:31:26 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> > deb http://www.debian.org/~jim/debian-gtk-gnome/gnome-stage-slink \
> > unstable main
>
> What's the difference between the above and:
>
> deb http://www.debian.org/~jules/gnome-stage-2 unstable main
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> > Ah. Now that I have that fixed, what's the proper place for enlightenment
> > 0.15 debs for slink? The following contains dependencies on glibg6 >=2.1
> > so I think it must be for potato:
> >
> > deb http://www.debian.org/~bma enlightenment/
>
>
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>
> > > > deb http://www.debian.org/~jim/debian-gtk-gnome/gnome-stage-slink \
> > > > unstable main
> > >
> > > What's the difference between the above and:
> > >
> > > deb http://www.debian.org/~jules/gno
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> > > deb http://www.debian.org/~jim/debian-gtk-gnome/gnome-stage-slink \
> > > unstable main
> >
> > What's the difference between the above and:
> >
> > deb http://www.debian.org/~jules/gnome-stage-2 unstable main
> >
> > What should one use for a
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>
> > > So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
> > > package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have
> > > indeed pos
*- On 2 Apr, Pollywog wrote about "Apt: WAS:: GNOME 1.0 .deb package?"
>
> On 02-Apr-99 Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, William R Pentney wrote:
>>
>>> So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
>>> packag
On 02-Apr-99 Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, William R Pentney wrote:
>
>> So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
>> package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have
>> indeed possible.
>
> Are
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> > So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
> > package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have
> > indeed possible.
>
> Are you using apt? Good. Then, put the following
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, William R Pentney wrote:
> So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
> package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have
> indeed possible.
Are you using apt? Good. Then, put the following line in your
/etc/apt/sou
On 02-Apr-99 William R Pentney wrote:
>
> So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
> package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have
> 0.30 installed and would rather upgrade it the "correct" way if
> indeed possible
So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian
package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have
0.30 installed and would rather upgrade it the "correct" way if
indeed possible.
- Bill
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just curious, how's the .debs of GNOME v1.0 coming?
I'm using it for work (keeping my old desktop config around as a backup of
course). I like it fine. To try it out, install slink (Debian 2.1) and
then add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources
Just curious, how's the .debs of GNOME v1.0 coming?
-Jay
> I tried to get the elightenment window manager 0.15, only it needs the
> libs for gnome ver 1.0.x (i think its 1.0.2) , among others
> libgnome32 1.0.2-1
> libgnomeui32
> imlib1 1.9.4-1
> libcapplet0 1.9.3-4
> etc.
> I can't seem to find these libs anywhere.
> If anyone knows where i may find th
I tried to get the elightenment window manager 0.15, only it needs the
libs for gnome ver 1.0.x (i think its 1.0.2) , among others
libgnome32 1.0.2-1
libgnomeui32
imlib1 1.9.4-1
libcapplet0 1.9.3-4
etc.
I can't seem to find these libs anywhere.
If anyone knows where i may find them, or how to inst
> The staging area is not a secret, it is publically available, too, for
> developers and testers. Check the dtk-gnome mailling list archiv if you are
> interested (or devel-announce).
>
And by testing this you make a significant worthwhile contribution to the
Debian project.
Whoops ... gnome 1
>
> Couldn't .debs that aren't 100% at least go into potato? That's what
> unstable is for isn't it ?
Why is there this pent up frustration for always having the absolute latest
versions of software? I would have thought it may be a good idea to wait a few
weeks to see if others report that the
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:37:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/10/99 6:44:38 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > Are there Gnome 1.0 debs yet?
> > I haven't tried Gnome yet. 1.0 seems like the place to start.
>
>
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> The staging area is not a secret, it is publically available, too, for
> developers and testers. Check the dtk-gnome mailling list archiv if you are
> interested (or devel-announce).
Hi Marcus,
Do you intend to develop installation instructions for
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 07:40:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Couldn't .debs that aren't 100% at least go into potato? That's what
> unstable is for isn't it ?
We had this before, and it was unconvenient at least because of the
complicated net of dependencies. The gnome stuff depends on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> I don't really think that KDE is the best example. For quite a while, KDE
> wasn't packaged because of the licensing issues.
>
Actually, those licensing issues are still not resolved. The latest kde
versio
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/10/99 6:44:38 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > Are there Gnome 1.0 debs yet?
> >
> > I haven't tried Gnome yet. 1.0 seems like the place to start.
> >
>
Couldn't .debs that aren't 100% at least go into potato? That's what
unstable is for isn't it ?
Regards
Sarel Botha
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Ya know, I don't want to offend any of the developers or anything, but I'm
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ya know, I don't want to offend any of the developers or anything, but I'm
> curious about something... Why is it that Debian is always the last to get
> packages for any given product? When KDE came out, rpms were right around the
> corner. This
In a message dated 3/10/99 6:44:38 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Are there Gnome 1.0 debs yet?
>
> I haven't tried Gnome yet. 1.0 seems like the place to start.
>
Ya know, I don't want to offend any of the developers or anything, but I
Are there Gnome 1.0 debs yet?
I haven't tried Gnome yet. 1.0 seems like the place to start.
--
...RickM...
30 matches
Mail list logo
